im kinda confused about how to go about this. chad waterbury says you should always try to move the weight as fast as possible and always have a controlled negative, but if youre lifting lifts that are heavy for you, how are you supposed to lift the weight as fast as possible? he says fast/explosive reps work the fast twitch muscle fibers. me personally, i use a weight for me and go slow and controlled. i feel my muscles working more by not going fast maybe cuz momentum is taken outta the picture. does anyone agree with waterbury? slow lifting reduces momentum and makes the muscles work harder and fast reps work the fast twitch muscle fibers. my goal is to preserve muscle and maybe build a little bit. what do you guys/gals do? should i go to a moderate weight and lift it as fast as possible or keep doing the weights that are heavy for me slow and controlled so momentum isnt doing the work for me???? thanks
|
Thread: fast reps vs. slow reps
-
09-05-2008, 08:24 PM #1
fast reps vs. slow reps
-
09-05-2008, 09:52 PM #2
who cares what the chad says, if it works for you, it works for you. both fast and slow positive movement has worked for me. and i've always been iffy about the chad. the dude thinks he's a teacher, bodybuilder, ufc fighter, and honestly sometimes it just makes him look like an idiot. just read his t-nation articles.
-
09-05-2008, 09:56 PM #3
-
09-05-2008, 10:03 PM #4
As far I know the slow reps build strenght ,max gains and the fast reps build speed , endurance /diffrent muscle fibers/
Slow reps should give you more gains but fast reps better deffinition.
Compare boxers to weight lifters
My advise would be do your slow reps but at least ones per week do fast reps to optimyze your work outs.
All depends on- do you focus on max gains or overall performance.
This is my opinion tho... there are so many diffrent aproches to training routines that it's hard to say this or that only -if you know what i mean.<<<I walk the line between good and evil,don't care for words that don't belong>>>
>> THIS SPACE FOR RENT <<
Powered by vBulletin? Version 3.6.3
Copyright ?2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin, Copyright 2000 - 2002, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
-
-
09-06-2008, 12:41 AM #5
-
09-06-2008, 08:28 AM #6
-
09-06-2008, 09:14 AM #7
-
09-06-2008, 09:46 AM #8
Unless you're doing an Olympic lift, then with a weight that is around 6RM or less even if you try to move it as fast as possible it's not going to move that quickly.
"I not only don't use gloves, I file the skin off my palms before each workout. I also wrap double sided tape about the bar, sprinkle broken glass on it, dip it in acid, then wrap it in razor wire. I also plug the bar into an outlet, and stand in a bucket of water." - Defiant1
-
-
09-06-2008, 12:20 PM #9
The negative part of my reps are always a little slower. I think that slowing down on the negatives is really important. The concentric part of my movements is always as fast as possible while maintaining control and form.
I don't often do superslow reps. Although Milos Sarcev (pro's come from all over the world to train with him) advocates using the superslow technique from time to time to fully exhaust muscles.Every journey begins with a single step.
-
09-06-2008, 12:26 PM #10
-
09-06-2008, 01:01 PM #11
-
09-06-2008, 01:18 PM #12
x2. There are benefits to doing both. "typically" a movement that you are concentrating on moving as fast as you can, will condition your CNS to recruit more fiber because you are using more than is needed to move the weight at a faster speed... personally, I think concentrating on going slower would not be very beneficial, i think to get that type of stimulation, isometric contraction would be much more appropriate, but thats just me.
-
-
09-06-2008, 01:46 PM #13
He means that when you bench press for example, you should try to explode out. This helps develop smaller muscles
**MISC Running Crew**
You are what you eat, love what you are.
"are u guys fuking wizard chefs??? surely u don't eat like this all the time...." TheDarkKnight27
I may or may not have gotten my avi idea from American_Psycho
-
09-06-2008, 01:50 PM #14
- Join Date: Oct 2007
- Location: Ft Mitchell, Kentucky, United States
- Age: 35
- Posts: 6,639
- Rep Power: 3233
I dont get whats with this fast slow ****, why not just do the weight normally unless your trying some stuff out for a day.
Workout log: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?p=454246811#post454246811
"Dude...there are ALWAYS ninjas. You just can't see them." - HardGainer82, Clark Kent, WishmasterATM, BPP, poopoo333, JOSEF RAKICH
-
09-06-2008, 02:06 PM #15
I'm a fan of slow-and-controlled, but I don't move at glacial speeds. I might take a second to go up, and a second to go down. But I'm not trying to get the weight up there as fast as possible, or trying for explosive movement. I'm trying to focus on maintaining form more than anything else.
--- Nick ---
-
09-06-2008, 02:10 PM #16
-
-
09-06-2008, 02:57 PM #17
- Join Date: May 2007
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 48
- Posts: 534
- Rep Power: 0
Bookmarks