I see a lot of people at the gym doing bench with their legs off the ground and crossed. I overheard one guy saying that doing that will put less strain on your lower back. Is that true and do you recommend doing that?
07-23-2008, 11:24 AM #1
07-23-2008, 11:34 AM #2
07-23-2008, 11:51 AM #3
Some dummies think they are working their core by having to balance their wobbly bench presses without the use of their legs as stabilizers.
Practically speaking, by putting your feet up on the bench you are taking the arch out of your lower back. Yes, this weakens your stability, and sure it will put less strain on your back if you normally drive your butt off the bench, but it flattens out your back and allows you to hit the pecs at an angle perpendicular to the spine, as opposed to 75 degrees or so.
07-23-2008, 12:34 PM #4
- Join Date: Feb 2008
- Location: United States
- Posts: 77,126
- Rep Power: 1418945
I definitely don't recommend that. Keep your feet solidly on the floor, and your butt and shoulders on the bench.No brain, no gain.
You can't out-train bad nutrition.
"The fitness and nutrition world is a breeding ground for obsessive-compulsive behavior. The irony is that many of the things people worry about have no impact on results either way, and therefore aren't worth an ounce of concern."--Alan Aragon
Ironwill2008 Workout Journal:
07-23-2008, 12:54 PM #5
- Join Date: Nov 2006
- Location: Danville, California, United States
- Age: 43
- Posts: 1,938
- Rep Power: 533
It does put less sheer force (stress) on the lower back, but it's inherently more stable.
If your lower back doesn't hurt, I'd keep them on the ground. If it does, I'd put your feet on a step bench or some plates stacked where your feet go. This way you get stability, but are able to bring your hips into flexion and take the stress off your lower back.
Best,Dr Clay Hyght, DC, CSCS, CISSN
Labrada Nutrition: "The Most Trusted Name in Sports Nutrition!"
The above is for informational purposes only and is not meant to be used as medical advice. Always consult your doctor prior to beginning any new diet, supplementation, or exercise program.
07-23-2008, 01:19 PM #6
NOT a good idea at all I did this for a while when I was starting out but only with light weight learning the form of bench. Alot of people will arch their back alot when doing bench if they have their feet on the floor, so just make sure your back is flat on the bench and you shouldnt get much strain anyways.
Last edited by GiZZmo; 07-23-2008 at 03:18 PM.You don't need designer workout equipment to be a BEAST!
"You can't out supplement a poor diet." - Valhallabound86
If I had Iron will and John G as my trainers I would win MR O title no doubt. SRS!!! Those guys through age and experience KNOW what they are talking about so LISTEN TO WHAT THEY TELL YOU HOMIE!
06-07-2010, 02:12 AM #7
- Join Date: Feb 2010
- Location: San Francisco, California, United States
- Age: 28
- Posts: 98
- Rep Power: 87
he was the lightest guy to ever bench 600 lbs raw in a meet- he did it at 229 lbs. DRUG FREE.
the next heaviest guy ever to do over 600 weighed 240- 11 lbs heavier and in a non-drug tested federation.
Rock Lewis has always benched with his legs crossed and he swears by it. i dont think hes ever been injured either.\
that must count for something
Last edited by jdoyle650; 06-07-2010 at 02:17 AM.GOAL: 1800 RAW @242 , no wrps drug free
06-07-2010, 03:00 AM #8
A lot of people jumping in and saying dont do it dont do it. Yet aren't backing up what they are saying.
Legs up, as dr clay said, puts less shear force on the back. Obviously you wont see the heaviest lifting powerlifters do this so often. For those with back issues, its actually a good idea. I've heard people say "they are trying to work their core", 1) no you just don't understand the difference in forces with an arched back and one that is in a decompressed position, and 2) if they are trying to, well they arent so bright
That being said, I wouldnt be doing my 1RM or even weight I find heavy for 5-6 reps with my legs up. Its good for those that have lower back issues, but not limited to.