 |
05-21-2008, 11:33 PM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
Age: 20
Stats: 5'11", 227 lbs
Posts: 80
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 1507
|
Ronnie pic Ive never seen before
ive never seen this pic before but it amazed me, thought id share hope its not a repost
__________________
Friends may come and go, but 200 pounds is always 200 pounds.
Why be Clark Kent when you can be Superman?
|
|
|
05-22-2008, 01:19 AM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NRW, Germany
Age: 22
Stats: 5'11", 192 lbs
Posts: 1,422
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 3281
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IronAnimal77
ive never seen this pic before but it amazed me, thought id share hope its not a repost
|
Great pic, got to be from 2005. Reps....
__________________
Ronnie KING Coleman, the greatest bodybuilder of all time.
Bodybuilding = Ronnie Coleman
|
|
|
05-22-2008, 01:32 AM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Age: 22
Stats: 5'11", 171 lbs
Posts: 665
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 5266
|
incredible mass he had back in the day!
|
|
|
05-22-2008, 08:21 AM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NRW, Germany
Age: 22
Stats: 5'11", 192 lbs
Posts: 1,422
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 3281
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piteng
incredible mass he had back in the day!
|
This picture is just a little over 30 months old.....
__________________
Ronnie KING Coleman, the greatest bodybuilder of all time.
Bodybuilding = Ronnie Coleman
|
|
|
05-22-2008, 08:25 AM
|
#5
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 20
Stats: 5'8", 184 lbs
Posts: 11,799
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 19981
|
His quads are so freaking full...How much he weighted in 2005???Looks like a dinosaur...
|
|
|
05-22-2008, 08:25 AM
|
#6
|
|
Lets climb trees and kiss
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sweden
Age: 19
Posts: 14,686
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 22139
|
2005 Ronnie for the win.
|
|
|
05-22-2008, 08:27 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NRW, Germany
Age: 22
Stats: 5'11", 192 lbs
Posts: 1,422
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 3281
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SickBoy_Cage
His quads are so freaking full...How much he weighted in 2005???Looks like a dinosaur...
|
I guess he was in he mid 270 lbs range.... One of his best showings ever IMO.
__________________
Ronnie KING Coleman, the greatest bodybuilder of all time.
Bodybuilding = Ronnie Coleman
|
|
|
05-22-2008, 08:28 AM
|
#8
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 20
Stats: 5'8", 184 lbs
Posts: 11,799
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 19981
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reisinger850
I guess he was in he mid 270 lbs range.... One of his best showings ever IMO.
|
I always thought it was around 290 LOL and thought 2004 was about 295 and 2003 about 280...I'm probably terribly wrong
|
|
|
05-22-2008, 08:34 AM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NRW, Germany
Age: 22
Stats: 5'11", 192 lbs
Posts: 1,422
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 3281
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SickBoy_Cage
I always thought it was around 290 LOL and thought 2004 was about 295 and 2003 about 280...I'm probably terribly wrong 
|
No not so wrong, 2003 he was probably 287 and in 2004 he was 296 lbs, but you could tell that he was much more shredded in 2005 than in 2004 and that his midesction looked great in 2005. He was definately much lighter than the two very heavy years before.
His 2005 conditioning was pretty close to that of 2003 and he had not really a gut in 2005.
__________________
Ronnie KING Coleman, the greatest bodybuilder of all time.
Bodybuilding = Ronnie Coleman
|
|
|
05-22-2008, 08:48 AM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Laval, Québec, Canada
Age: 22
Posts: 6,228
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 21004
|
never seen the red outfit
__________________
I owe reps to:
............./??/)............ (\?`\
............/....//........... ..\\....\
.........../....//............ ...\\.... \
...../??/..../??\............/?`\.....\?`\
.././.../..../..../.|_......_| .\..\... .\...\.\..
(.(....(....(..../.)..)..(..(. \.....).... )....).)
.\................\/.../....\. ..\/...... ........./
..\................. /........\.................../
....\..............(.......... .)....... ......./
|
|
|
05-22-2008, 09:59 AM
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mccutcheon Field, North Carolina, United States
Age: 22
Stats: 6'0", 210 lbs
Posts: 359
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 1770
|
what's up with his left lat lol.. like it bulges out, then sucks in by the armpit or somethin??
__________________
Height - 6'0
Weight - 210
These are my goals below..
Weight - 225
Arms - 18"
Bench - 320 x 3
Curl - 195 x 3
Squat - 465 Parallel
|
|
|
05-22-2008, 10:25 AM
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
Age: 20
Stats: 5'9", 143 lbs
Posts: 2,586
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 5171
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by djfury05
what's up with his left lat lol.. like it bulges out, then sucks in by the armpit or somethin??
|
Sorry, that was my bad photoshop skills.
|
|
|
05-22-2008, 11:12 AM
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 26
Stats: 6'3", 265 lbs
Posts: 523
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 919
|
2005 the year of the "belly ban" because of the monsters that took the stage in 2004. (Ronnie 296, Jay 274 with a lot of water, Marcus at his heaviest of 287 but finished 5th, Gunter at 295-300, Dennis James was really heavy etc...) Ronnie was 275-280 in 05' but was not better than 2003 imo.
|
|
|
05-22-2008, 12:36 PM
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: United States
Age: 32
Stats: 6'0", 221 lbs
Posts: 2,566
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 4286
|
There stands the greatest bodybuilder ever to grace the stage. Great shot btw.
__________________
Eat your ass
|
|
|
05-22-2008, 12:51 PM
|
#15
|
|
IQ: 69
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 23
Stats: 65'7", 225 lbs
Posts: 19,585
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 31811
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reisinger850
No not so wrong, 2003 he was probably 287 and in 2004 he was 296 lbs, but you could tell that he was much more shredded in 2005 than in 2004 and that his midesction looked great in 2005. He was definately much lighter than the two very heavy years before.
His 2005 conditioning was pretty close to that of 2003 and he had not really a gut in 2005.
|
2005 wasn't his best ever conditioning, best ever size or best ever aesthetics.
But it was a perfect greatest hits package.
__________________
Listen to Sergeant Pluck, he knows what he's talking about.
|
|
|
05-22-2008, 01:23 PM
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
Age: 20
Stats: 5'9", 143 lbs
Posts: 2,586
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 5171
|
Ronnie coleman's only ever looked good from the chin up.
|
|
|
05-22-2008, 01:33 PM
|
#17
|
|
IQ: 69
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 23
Stats: 65'7", 225 lbs
Posts: 19,585
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 31811
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by first_second
Ronnie coleman's only ever looked good from the chin up.
|
The attractiveness of men's faces is not generally subject matter for this board.
__________________
Listen to Sergeant Pluck, he knows what he's talking about.
|
|
|
05-22-2008, 01:39 PM
|
#18
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
Age: 20
Stats: 5'9", 143 lbs
Posts: 2,586
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 5171
|
Sorry sweet cheeks.
|
|
|
05-22-2008, 04:10 PM
|
#19
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: ON, Canada
Stats: 6'0", 245 lbs
Posts: 2,998
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 14333
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IronAnimal77
ive never seen this pic before but it amazed me, thought id share hope its not a repost
|
Wow look at the lat, you can already see it loosing a portion of its mass near the top. I dont liek his physique in the later years, the skin just doesnt look as polished as it once did, obviously.. But wow, did he have amazing skin back in the day. IMO skin is very important for bbing..
__________________
Pic is over a year and a half old. For all the haters...
|
|
|
05-22-2008, 04:26 PM
|
#20
|
|
Unbanned
Join Date: Apr 2005
Age: 22
Stats: 6'1", 234 lbs
Posts: 9,152
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 7811
|
this isnt a bad pic
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Member Login
Sign in for more FREE features and tools!
|
|