 |
05-07-2008, 05:58 PM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
Age: 21
Stats: 5'11", 165 lbs
Posts: 2,203
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 14716
|
Max Box Squat vs Back Squat
whats the difference between your max on both, assuming its a parrallel box.
|
|
|
05-07-2008, 06:04 PM
|
#2
|
|
O'Doyle Rules!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Warrington, Pennsylvania, United States
Age: 19
Stats: 6'2", 210 lbs
Posts: 1,773
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 4532
|
a lot less on box squats
__________________
WARRIOR
Imma born american a natural born killer, now Imma rude boy son im a predator
Clip! The wings that get you high! Just leave them where they lie!
And tell yourself, "You'll be the death of me"
ARMY STRONG
|
|
|
05-07-2008, 06:47 PM
|
#3
|
|
USAF
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maryland, United States
Age: 18
Stats: 6'0", 199 lbs
Posts: 7,628
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 16621
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doyl888
a lot less on box squats
|
You mean alot more on box squats. I can do alot more weight on box squats then I do when I squat.
__________________
USAF- In Tech School ;)
My journal to get abs
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=120596711
|
|
|
05-07-2008, 07:00 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
Age: 21
Stats: 5'11", 165 lbs
Posts: 2,203
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 14716
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmanjman47
You mean alot more on box squats. I can do alot more weight on box squats then I do when I squat.
|
yeah me too I can squat 260 and box squat probably 280.
|
|
|
05-07-2008, 07:15 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Stats: 5'11", 197 lbs
Posts: 253
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 0
|
If you can box squat more then you parallel squat, you're doing it wrong. How could you lift more weight when you lose all momentum at the bottom on box squat, doesn't make sense. It's going to depend on the person, but in general, your box squat will be around 50 pounds less then your regular squat.
|
|
|
05-07-2008, 07:19 PM
|
#6
|
|
USAF
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maryland, United States
Age: 18
Stats: 6'0", 199 lbs
Posts: 7,628
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 16621
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redwing8
If you can box squat more then you parallel squat, you're doing it wrong. How could you lift more weight when you lose all momentum at the bottom on box squat, doesn't make sense. It's going to depend on the person, but in general, your box squat will be around 50 pounds less then your regular squat.
|
I squat ATG. I never do parallel or above parallel. **** hurts my knees
__________________
USAF- In Tech School ;)
My journal to get abs
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=120596711
|
|
|
05-07-2008, 07:21 PM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
Age: 21
Stats: 5'11", 165 lbs
Posts: 2,203
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 14716
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redwing8
If you can box squat more then you parallel squat, you're doing it wrong. How could you lift more weight when you lose all momentum at the bottom on box squat, doesn't make sense. It's going to depend on the person, but in general, your box squat will be around 50 pounds less then your regular squat.
|
what momentum? the momentum is going down so how would that help. One of the reasons the box helps me is because parallel is my sticking point and having a box there makes me feel more comfortable with heavy weight. Thats funny I always thought box squats were easier for everyone. So if I box squated 2x my bodyweight, would that be the same or better than a normal parallel squat, for my vj?
Last edited by sohard88; 05-07-2008 at 07:24 PM.
|
|
|
05-07-2008, 07:39 PM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Age: 19
Posts: 551
|
the vertical jump is primarily a quad dominat maneuvre, and the atg squat would be a better for the vj in that sense, but the the box squat recruits much more fast twitch musles, and also alot of people have muslce imbalances in the posterior chain wich also contributes to the vertical jump, so it really depends on what you need.
__________________
year 2
Weight 202
Bf% 22
Squat 250x7
Deadlift(sumo) 290x2
Bench press 150x8
year 3
weight 182
Bf% 16
squat 300
deadlift 320x5
bench press 170x8
"Cause all I wanna do is go the distance. Nobody's ever gone the distance with Creed, and if I can go that distance, you see, and that bell rings and I'm still standin', I'm gonna know for the first time in my life, see, that I weren't just another bum from the neighborhood" -ur ghey if u dont know
|
|
|
05-07-2008, 07:43 PM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
Age: 21
Stats: 5'11", 165 lbs
Posts: 2,203
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 14716
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaphoenix
the vertical jump is primarily a quad dominat maneuvre, and the atg squat would be a better for the vj in that sense, but the the box squat recruits much more fast twitch musles, and also alot of people have muslce imbalances in the posterior chain wich also contributes to the vertical jump, so it really depends on what you need.
|
do you squat more or less with a box?
|
|
|
05-07-2008, 07:54 PM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Age: 19
Posts: 551
|
way less, at least 30 pounds
__________________
year 2
Weight 202
Bf% 22
Squat 250x7
Deadlift(sumo) 290x2
Bench press 150x8
year 3
weight 182
Bf% 16
squat 300
deadlift 320x5
bench press 170x8
"Cause all I wanna do is go the distance. Nobody's ever gone the distance with Creed, and if I can go that distance, you see, and that bell rings and I'm still standin', I'm gonna know for the first time in my life, see, that I weren't just another bum from the neighborhood" -ur ghey if u dont know
|
|
|
05-07-2008, 08:14 PM
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
Age: 21
Stats: 5'11", 165 lbs
Posts: 2,203
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 14716
|
I wonder what my problem is then, but I think the reason I box squat more is all mental, (knowing I wont get stuck below parallel). Thank you guys knowing your supposed to squat more w/o the box will help me fix the problem.
|
|
|
05-07-2008, 08:46 PM
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 19
Stats: 5'11", 191 lbs
Posts: 662
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 4659
|
my squat parallel is 370 and i box squat about 405
|
|
|
05-07-2008, 09:13 PM
|
#13
|
|
Rugby Coach
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 583
|
Box 500-515
Free 420 is the most I've ever done ATG
__________________
http://therugbyacademy.blogspot.com
Unfinished Business: The Comeback Log
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?p=171121621
|
|
|
05-07-2008, 09:29 PM
|
#14
|
|
Hey You Guuuys!!!
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas, United States
Age: 22
Stats: 6'0", 234 lbs
Posts: 4,238
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 9866
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sohard88
I wonder what my problem is then, but I think the reason I box squat more is all mental, (knowing I wont get stuck below parallel). Thank you guys knowing your supposed to squat more w/o the box will help me fix the problem.
|
I can probably guarantee you aren't at parallel. If you are squatting above 14 inches.. you are past parallel. You also may be rocking off the box when you raise up as well.
My box squat 1 inch below is 530, and my max squat is 575.
__________________
GOALS-Box Squat 615, Below 10% BF@ 225,4.45 Laser, 40' Vert, 1st team All-American
Academics
B.S. Kinesiology-exercise science, CPT, CSCS-NSCA-'10
-Commercial gyms are for phags. It's all about Garage Gym HELL!
*^#* 185LB. Weight Loss Crew *^#*
|
|
|
05-07-2008, 09:47 PM
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
Age: 21
Stats: 5'11", 165 lbs
Posts: 2,203
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 14716
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fullback7
I can probably guarantee you aren't at parallel. If you are squatting above 14 inches.. you are past parallel. You also may be rocking off the box when you raise up as well.
My box squat 1 inch below is 530, and my max squat is 575.
|
yeah I think the box is like a little above parallel its one of those grocery plastic boxes, but its not by much. Im not sure if I rock or not I probably do. Anyway thank you for posting in this thread, I was hoping you would answer. I need to find something lower to box squat off then, I think a normal bench should be a little below parallel.
Last edited by sohard88; 05-07-2008 at 09:55 PM.
|
|
|
05-07-2008, 11:10 PM
|
#16
|
|
8 Man
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canada
Age: 20
Stats: 6'4", 240 lbs
Posts: 2,688
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 17998
|
Mine are Equal...
__________________
Position: Number 8 & Lock
Height: 6'4
Weight: 118kg
"Rugby players are born and made into Athletes"
Welsh Proverb
|
|
|
05-07-2008, 11:34 PM
|
#17
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Age: 22
Stats: 6'0", 220 lbs
Posts: 4,725
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 3359
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sohard88
yeah me too I can squat 260 and box squat probably 280.
|
what? u should be able to box squat way higher. when i was in highschool i squatted 365 regular and box squatted 500 u feel like your backs about to break
|
|
|
05-08-2008, 12:19 AM
|
#18
|
|
Hey You Guuuys!!!
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas, United States
Age: 22
Stats: 6'0", 234 lbs
Posts: 4,238
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 9866
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by xchampx
what? u should be able to box squat way higher. when i was in highschool i squatted 365 regular and box squatted 500 u feel like your backs about to break
|
Then you must really be doing something wrong. If you have that much pressure in your back, then there is no way you can box 500, and only 365.. Your body would not be used to weight. You must of had an extremely large high box in order to carry the extra load.
__________________
GOALS-Box Squat 615, Below 10% BF@ 225,4.45 Laser, 40' Vert, 1st team All-American
Academics
B.S. Kinesiology-exercise science, CPT, CSCS-NSCA-'10
-Commercial gyms are for phags. It's all about Garage Gym HELL!
*^#* 185LB. Weight Loss Crew *^#*
|
|
|
05-08-2008, 01:12 PM
|
#19
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Michigan, United States
Age: 22
Stats: 5'11", 183 lbs
Posts: 1,304
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 1234
|
I think you can do more back squat at least how I'm looking at it and how it feels. When I do a back squat at the bottom of the squat you get kind of a bounce which gets you moving upward .... on the box squat it eliminates that bounce assuming that the box is stiff and won't give when you get on it. Both are good for you though because even if there is no difference the box squat teaches you correct form and distance in squatting for the times when you will not use the box.
__________________
Current Supplements:
N/A
=============================================
My Training Log:
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?p=269147831
=============================================
Last edited by jgood; 05-08-2008 at 01:15 PM.
|
|
|
05-08-2008, 07:49 PM
|
#20
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Age: 17
Stats: 6'3", 274 lbs
Posts: 98
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 856
|
On bellow parrallel back squats I can do 455 3x with good form. But when I go on box squats ive actually done 540 somthing for 2 reps with good form. So im going to agree with the people who say you should be doing allot more on box squats. And the box wasnt much higher MAYBE an inch above parallel for me.
__________________
"Ability is what you're capable of doing. Motivation determines what you do. Attitude determines how well you do it." Lou Holtz
"We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done."-Cant remember
|
|
|
05-09-2008, 04:17 AM
|
#21
|
|
O'Doyle Rules!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Warrington, Pennsylvania, United States
Age: 19
Stats: 6'2", 210 lbs
Posts: 1,773
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 4532
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigpoppa-JD
On bellow parrallel back squats I can do 455 3x with good form. But when I go on box squats ive actually done 540 somthing for 2 reps with good form. So im going to agree with the people who say you should be doing allot more on box squats. And the box wasnt much higher MAYBE an inch above parallel for me.
|
this is where the problem is with this thread, some people ar talking about parrallell back squat vs parrallell box squat, or one parrallell one atg, or one atg and one above parallell... of course someones gonna do more if the distances are different by like 5 inches
__________________
WARRIOR
Imma born american a natural born killer, now Imma rude boy son im a predator
Clip! The wings that get you high! Just leave them where they lie!
And tell yourself, "You'll be the death of me"
ARMY STRONG
|
|
|
05-09-2008, 07:38 AM
|
#22
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Age: 25
Stats: 5'8", 225 lbs
Posts: 935
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 0
|
You should definately have a bigger back squat than box squat to the same depth, if you squat 1" below parrallel then this should be bigger than your box squat off a 1" below parallel box.
__________________
Weak in the gym, weak in the kitchen.
5/3/1 log http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=120169521
5-3-1 Spreadsheet I've made, feel free to use it http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?yxnn0dtrw3j
Goals: Squat - 275kg/605lbs, Deadlift - 275kg/605lbs, Bench - 182.5kg/401.5lbs, Military Press - 120kg/264lbs
At a bodyweight of 220-235lbs.
|
|
|
05-09-2008, 07:55 AM
|
#23
|
|
G-F-H
Join Date: May 2003
Location: United States
Age: 23
Posts: 95
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 0
|
Box squats are done incorrectly about 80% of the time. Most people load up way too much weight and either bounce off of a box and lose complete lock of their lower back, or use a box that is too high just so they look strong and can impress people. I would much rather prefer a parallel squat done correctly over a box squat.
__________________
age 22
6'3 255lbs
bench 415
squat 565
4.72 laser 40yard
2 time All American in Track and Field
CSCS, ACSM, CSCCa
Future Worlds Strongest Man Contestant.
B.A. Degree in Kinesiology
Currently working on Masters
|
|
|
05-09-2008, 09:50 AM
|
#24
|
|
Hey You Guuuys!!!
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas, United States
Age: 22
Stats: 6'0", 234 lbs
Posts: 4,238
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 9866
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by northlft
Box squats are done incorrectly about 80% of the time. Most people load up way too much weight and either bounce off of a box and lose complete lock of their lower back, or use a box that is too high just so they look strong and can impress people. I would much rather prefer a parallel squat done correctly over a box squat.
|
very true, but if you know how to do box squats they heavily outweigh the beneifts of regular squats. I think a lot of people are confusing the depth of parallel. It is much lower than what their coach says is right when they max out on their squat. I also think a lot of these guys think that a bench is parallel which is what I assume most use for box squats. I am a little over 6'0, and a 13 inch box is parallel for me. For most 14 inches will be parallel, yet most are using a box around 18-20 inches such as a bench.
__________________
GOALS-Box Squat 615, Below 10% BF@ 225,4.45 Laser, 40' Vert, 1st team All-American
Academics
B.S. Kinesiology-exercise science, CPT, CSCS-NSCA-'10
-Commercial gyms are for phags. It's all about Garage Gym HELL!
*^#* 185LB. Weight Loss Crew *^#*
|
|
|
05-09-2008, 11:06 AM
|
#25
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Age: 22
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaphoenix
the vertical jump is primarily a quad dominat maneuvre, and the atg squat would be a better for the vj in that sense, but the the box squat recruits much more fast twitch musles, and also alot of people have muslce imbalances in the posterior chain wich also contributes to the vertical jump, so it really depends on what you need.
|
wrong, glutes major determinant
|
|
|
05-09-2008, 12:03 PM
|
#26
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Age: 22
Stats: 6'0", 220 lbs
Posts: 4,725
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 3359
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fullback7
Then you must really be doing something wrong. If you have that much pressure in your back, then there is no way you can box 500, and only 365.. Your body would not be used to weight. You must of had an extremely large high box in order to carry the extra load.
|
the box was low enough for my legs to be parallel. im not e stating just sayin
|
|
|
05-09-2008, 01:45 PM
|
#27
|
|
Smooth criminal
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pennsylvania, United States
Age: 19
Stats: 5'11", 184 lbs
Posts: 4,346
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 17822
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fullback7
very true, but if you know how to do box squats they heavily outweigh the beneifts of regular squats. I think a lot of people are confusing the depth of parallel. It is much lower than what their coach says is right when they max out on their squat. I also think a lot of these guys think that a bench is parallel which is what I assume most use for box squats. I am a little over 6'0, and a 13 inch box is parallel for me. For most 14 inches will be parallel, yet most are using a box around 18-20 inches such as a bench.
|
Do you know how high a normal bench is? I only tried box squats once ever, and that was with a normal bench. I think it was about parallel...
__________________
JOURNAL: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=110936481
|
|
|
05-09-2008, 01:51 PM
|
#28
|
|
147gr JHP
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pennsylvania, United States
Age: 23
Stats: 5'6", 178 lbs
Posts: 13,054
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 31113
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerG
Do you know how high a normal bench is? I only tried box squats once ever, and that was with a normal bench. I think it was about parallel...
|
A competition bench will be about 17".
If you are squatting and box squatting to the same depth, you will free squat more as you have the ability to utilize a stretch reflex.
__________________
http://youtube.com/user/Kiknskreem
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=2104141
|
|
|
05-09-2008, 02:32 PM
|
#29
|
|
Hey You Guuuys!!!
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas, United States
Age: 22
Stats: 6'0", 234 lbs
Posts: 4,238
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 9866
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerG
Do you know how high a normal bench is? I only tried box squats once ever, and that was with a normal bench. I think it was about parallel...
|
Anywhere from 17-20 inches. For most people thats around 4-7 inches above parallel. Benches are way above parallel.
__________________
GOALS-Box Squat 615, Below 10% BF@ 225,4.45 Laser, 40' Vert, 1st team All-American
Academics
B.S. Kinesiology-exercise science, CPT, CSCS-NSCA-'10
-Commercial gyms are for phags. It's all about Garage Gym HELL!
*^#* 185LB. Weight Loss Crew *^#*
|
|
|
05-10-2008, 11:22 PM
|
#30
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Meridian, Idaho, United States
Age: 21
Stats: 5'10", 162 lbs
Posts: 56
BodyPoints: 0
Rep Power: 2  
|
just 'cause were all tryin to throw in their max's i should add i regular squat 395 and box squat 850 "j/k", so i guess there is a little improvement, lol
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Member Login
Sign in for more FREE features and tools!
|
|