Bodybuilding.com Forums
Old 04-21-2008, 01:52 PM   #1
kickfacejimmy
Unregistered User
 
kickfacejimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pennsylvania, United States
Age: 19
Stats: 5'10", 191 lbs
Posts: 118
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 0
Rep Power: 28
kickfacejimmy has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)kickfacejimmy has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)kickfacejimmy has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)kickfacejimmy has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)kickfacejimmy has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)kickfacejimmy has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)kickfacejimmy has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)kickfacejimmy has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)kickfacejimmy has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)kickfacejimmy has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)kickfacejimmy has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
Visit kickfacejimmy's BodySpace
Question Glycemic Index??

Does anyone take into account the glycemic index of the carbohydrates they are eating? I always knew about it but I was pretty amazed at what the numbers were. Actually, I'm sort of confused. I thought fruit would be high on the glycemic index because of being loaded with sugar, but it only scored like a 38 out of 100. I've read that fat loss is best achieved with foods under 50, which leaves out foods like baked potatos (85), yams (51), and rice (55), but includes foods like apples, grapes (46), and milk (32). I just didn't expect this.

See for yourself:
http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/issa5.htm
kickfacejimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008, 02:08 PM   #2
in10city
On a War Path
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 21,947
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 7900
Rep Power: 13734
in10city has a reputation beyond repute. Best rank possible! (+100000)in10city has a reputation beyond repute. Best rank possible! (+100000)in10city has a reputation beyond repute. Best rank possible! (+100000)in10city has a reputation beyond repute. Best rank possible! (+100000)in10city has a reputation beyond repute. Best rank possible! (+100000)in10city has a reputation beyond repute. Best rank possible! (+100000)in10city has a reputation beyond repute. Best rank possible! (+100000)in10city has a reputation beyond repute. Best rank possible! (+100000)in10city has a reputation beyond repute. Best rank possible! (+100000)in10city has a reputation beyond repute. Best rank possible! (+100000)in10city has a reputation beyond repute. Best rank possible! (+100000)
Visit in10city's BodySpace
Quote:
Originally Posted by kickfacejimmy View Post
Does anyone take into account the glycemic index of the carbohydrates they are eating? I always knew about it but I was pretty amazed at what the numbers were. Actually, I'm sort of confused. I thought fruit would be high on the glycemic index because of being loaded with sugar, but it only scored like a 38 out of 100. I've read that fat loss is best achieved with foods under 50, which leaves out foods like baked potatos (85), yams (51), and rice (55), but includes foods like apples, grapes (46), and milk (32). I just didn't expect this.

See for yourself:
http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/issa5.htm
Fruit is low because it contains fructose which is metabolized by the body differently.

Anyhow, glycemic index becomes less important in a fed state and in a mixed meal. Read up on how GI is measured and you'll see why.

Read this too -> Elements Challenging the Validity of the Glycemic Index

This sums it up : "Carb foods are better judged on the basis of degree processing, refinement, or alteration/removal of micronutrition -- NOT on the basis of GI, or even GL."
__________________
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.

As long as the active agent is "unknown" some dork is still gonna be poppin' chicken beaks so he can freakin' squat!

Crank up those catecholamines, that's not chicken I smell being cooked.
in10city is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008, 02:12 PM   #3
Saturnal
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 29
Stats: 5'7", 184 lbs
Posts: 778
BodyBlog Entries: 49
BodyPoints: 11058
Rep Power: 771
Saturnal has a reputation beyond repute. Best rank possible! (+100000)Saturnal has a reputation beyond repute. Best rank possible! (+100000)Saturnal has a reputation beyond repute. Best rank possible! (+100000)Saturnal has a reputation beyond repute. Best rank possible! (+100000)Saturnal has a reputation beyond repute. Best rank possible! (+100000)Saturnal has a reputation beyond repute. Best rank possible! (+100000)Saturnal has a reputation beyond repute. Best rank possible! (+100000)Saturnal has a reputation beyond repute. Best rank possible! (+100000)Saturnal has a reputation beyond repute. Best rank possible! (+100000)Saturnal has a reputation beyond repute. Best rank possible! (+100000)Saturnal has a reputation beyond repute. Best rank possible! (+100000)
Visit Saturnal's BodySpace
Quote:
Originally Posted by in10city View Post
Fruit is low because it contains fructose which is metabolized by the body differently.

Anyhow, glycemic index becomes less important in a fed state and in a mixed meal. Read up on how GI is measured and you'll see why.

Read this too -> Elements Challenging the Validity of the Glycemic Index

This sums it up : "Carb foods are better judged on the basis of degree processing, refinement, or alteration/removal of micronutrition -- NOT on the basis of GI, or even GL."
x2

I don't take GI into consideration.
Saturnal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008, 03:10 PM   #4
kickfacejimmy
Unregistered User
 
kickfacejimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pennsylvania, United States
Age: 19
Stats: 5'10", 191 lbs
Posts: 118
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 0
Rep Power: 28
kickfacejimmy has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)kickfacejimmy has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)kickfacejimmy has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)kickfacejimmy has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)kickfacejimmy has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)kickfacejimmy has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)kickfacejimmy has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)kickfacejimmy has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)kickfacejimmy has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)kickfacejimmy has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)kickfacejimmy has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
Visit kickfacejimmy's BodySpace
thanks alot.
kickfacejimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Member Login

Sign in for more FREE features and tools!

Username or
Email Address:
Password:
Remember Me


New to Bodybuilding.com?
Sign Up Now It's FREE!




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:01 AM. Archive