|
-
03-20-2008, 01:43 PM #91
-
03-20-2008, 01:46 PM #92
-
-
03-20-2008, 02:09 PM #93
- Join Date: Jul 2005
- Location: California, United States
- Posts: 40,935
- Rep Power: 85704
-
03-20-2008, 02:15 PM #94
We are similar at least insofar as we are both members of sub-cultures which are often on the wrong end of hatred and discrimination - not that there's a "right" end. Interestingly, the gay sub-culture is the only one which has members from all other sub-cultures. Ironically, the gay sub-culture is threatened by those who would amend the Constitution against us. Gay African-Americans must really be bent out of shape on that!
Last edited by SDMuscleBuddy; 03-20-2008 at 02:17 PM.
-
03-20-2008, 02:17 PM #95Un-natural and immoral? You were given this information from a book that was written several thousand years ago. (No religion bashing).
Child molestation = Two men or two women loving each other?
Murder = Two men or two women loving each other?
You have serious issues if you're trying to convince me that is right. It doesn't even effect your life. You get all bent out of shape and angry, raising your blood pressure, shortening your life, because of YOU.
Why do you care so much? And no I'm not mad, but I am highly insulted that you would compare those two true abominations to innocent, and natural chemical reaction.
If a molesters attraction to children could be proven to be a natural chemical reaction, would it be fine with you?
Science > Religious rules IN THIS CASE.
In the case of homosexuality I'm giving this one to science over religion.
-
03-20-2008, 02:20 PM #96
I suspect it are only those with latent homosexual tendencies, that they are uncomfortable with, who do the actual gay hating act.
Personally, when I see a gay couple walking hand in hand or whatever, I feel nothing. No disgust or discomfort or excitement. Nothing. I think for a straight guy that is a normal and healthy responce. Anything that deviates from that and you are [latent] gay in my book, not that there is anything wrong with that of course.
Here's to hoping that all the gay haters will soon find the courage to embrace their sexuality.
-
-
03-20-2008, 02:28 PM #97
- Join Date: May 2006
- Location: Texas: swimming in a way that you can't detect...
- Age: 36
- Posts: 46,471
- Rep Power: 19965
LOL, that first line was a half-joke. The truth is many gays bother us. But that's cus a lot of the gay guys where I'm from are super queenish. Like I said, it's not the gays that bother us, it's the attention whore gays that do cus I don't like attention whores, and Im guessing neither do the other folks back home. We don't really care so long as they don't act like attention whores. Seems to me like you misunderstood my post.
-
03-20-2008, 02:33 PM #98
- Join Date: Jul 2005
- Location: California, United States
- Posts: 40,935
- Rep Power: 85704
If you hate gays you must be gay? I don't think so, however, you may resent, be threatened by, or be jealous (for whatever reason) of them. Incidentally, this is not the first time I've heard that one.
One more thing, being a stanch conservative (not necessarily in the political sense) I am threatened by the appropriateness of these actions. For example, if I see a hetero couple making more than affectionate overtures I take offense and tell them to "get a room." Therefore, I have no compunctions at telling a gay couple under the same circumstances to do the same.Last edited by KRANE; 03-20-2008 at 02:36 PM.
🎥
Site oldest post: [url]https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=172072283&p=1540411941&viewfull=1#post1540411941[/url]
Filmmaker Thread: https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=165304201&p=1534834621#post1534834621
-
03-20-2008, 03:09 PM #99
-
03-20-2008, 03:32 PM #100
- Join Date: Jul 2005
- Location: California, United States
- Posts: 40,935
- Rep Power: 85704
Come, come now, lets not turn this into something it's not. There's a difference between consciously seeking attention and unsolicited admiration because of you presence. Besides, your defensive posture indicate the reference says more about you, than it does about him.
🎥
Site oldest post: [url]https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=172072283&p=1540411941&viewfull=1#post1540411941[/url]
Filmmaker Thread: https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=165304201&p=1534834621#post1534834621
-
-
03-20-2008, 03:34 PM #101
-
03-20-2008, 03:42 PM #102
Seems you're the one getting defensive, bro, and my post wasn't even directed at you. I was kidding. Perhaps you didn't notice the little Winky-Dinky emoticon I attached to it. Besides, having nearly 25 thousand posts in less than two years is hardly "unsolicited" attention.
Last edited by SDMuscleBuddy; 03-20-2008 at 03:48 PM.
-
03-20-2008, 04:14 PM #103
-
03-21-2008, 12:45 AM #104
- Join Date: Jun 2003
- Location: Brooklyn, New York, United States
- Age: 38
- Posts: 4,184
- Rep Power: 2109
they're similar in that they are both minority groups who are often wrongfully persecuted for being who they are. i didn't think that was so farfetched. the only difference is that people who verbalize their anti-black sentiments are shunned/disciplined, but people who verbalize their anti-gay sentiments are seen as having a legitimate viewpoint. it's just times, man. times are ever-changing; some people are just behind the times on this "issue".
-
-
03-21-2008, 12:50 AM #105
Why? Because humans, in their consistent strive to build structure and restriction in places where there is no need to for the sake of imposing their authority and will on others, are the only creatures in the animal kingdom to place "moral" restrictions on the harmless, biologically-mediated, natural act of sexual attraction and sexual activity.
-
03-21-2008, 04:15 AM #106
- Join Date: May 2006
- Location: Texas: swimming in a way that you can't detect...
- Age: 36
- Posts: 46,471
- Rep Power: 19965
I don't attention whore on here though. I hardly even make threads. I usually just post in Misc threads
And I'm not "intimidated" by fairies...I think they're gross. There's a difference. When I see a gay person doing queeny stuff, it doesn't strike fear to the core of my being...it just grosses me out.
-
03-21-2008, 04:58 AM #107
Well, surely no one wakes up one day and says "Hmm... Forget about this 21 year old! 7 years old sounds good to me!"
AND NO. CHILD MOLESTATION IS DIFFERENT FROM HOMOSEXUALITY!
If science proved to you homosexuality was bad for the participants, would you accept that finding?
Or a man, woman, and woman.Moved Squat, Bench, and Deadlift to Yoke, Log, and Stones.
-
03-21-2008, 07:43 AM #108
-
-
03-21-2008, 04:18 PM #109
According to the gays, no one wakes up one morning an says "Hmm...forget about women! Some hairy man ass sounds good to me!"
Remember, its genetic, you're born with it (according to them rofl).
Yes, yes...homosexuality and child molestation are two different things. But, there may be a strong correlation, don't you think? What is with all these men wanting to molest young boys? You can't deny they are gay child molesters can you? Do you really wish to flaut logic to that degree?
-
03-21-2008, 04:33 PM #110
- Join Date: May 2007
- Location: Florida, United States
- Posts: 4,442
- Rep Power: 6846
Not this again. You are flatly wrong, based on the clinical research. There is no correlation between homosexuality and the incidence of child molestation.
From the American Psychological Assocation:
http://www.apa.org/psyclaw/boyscout.html
B. Gay Adults Do Not Present a Heightened Danger of Sexual Abuse.
One manifestation of prejudice has been the allegation that gay men pose a particular danger to children. However, all available research data and clinical experience indicates that gay men are not more likely than heterosexual men to sexually abuse children. A study of children seen for sexual abuse in a one-year period at a Denver children's hospital, for example, found that less than one percent of the identified adult offenders were gay or lesbian. Of the 219 abused girls, only one instance of abuse had been attributed to a lesbian. Of the 50 abused boys, only one instance of abuse had been attributed to a gay man. In contrast, 88 percent of the offenders had documented heterosexual relationships and most were heterosexual partners of a family member (77 percent of those who abused the girls and 74 percent of those who abused the boys).
One source of confusion in this area is that many men who sexually abuse boys are not themselves homosexual. Rather, they are attracted, entirely or predominately, to children. These men have never developed a mature sexual orientation, either heterosexual or homosexual.
One study of 175 adult males who had been convicted in Massachusetts for sexual assault of a child found that 47 percent were exclusively interested in children, 40 percent were regressed heterosexuals, and 13 percent were regressed bisexuals. None had an exclusively homosexual orientation, and none of those who were bisexual were primarily attracted to men.
Assertions to the contrary by Family Research Council and others cannot be considered reliable. These amici seriously mischaracterize research and rely on dubious sources. Their presumption that homosexual men are ****philes is contrary to the legitimate research in the field, just as any such presumption about heterosexual men would be."You will give the people an ideal to strive towards. They'll race behind you. They will stumble; they will fall. But, in time, they will join you in the sun. In time, you will help them accomplish wonders." Jor-El
---
Kris Gethin's Body By Design, pg. 43/44 (Yes, that s me)
-
03-21-2008, 04:34 PM #111
No correlation. Child molestation, like rape, is not really a sexual act. These are acts of dominance and control over their victims, "victim" being one of several distinguishing factors between gay men in a consensual relationship and child molesters.
Furthermore, while there are more molestations of a heterosexual nature, from my understanding, children are often neither male nor female in the mind of the molester, being more like a third gender. While there may be a disproportionate number of man on boy molestations, it is likely because boys are more accessable. Regardless, most child molesters, even men who attack boys, are heterosexual, married with children.
-
03-21-2008, 08:03 PM #112
Hmmm...homosexuality and Republican politicians are two different things...but there maybe a strong correlation...What is with all these Republican politicians getting busted with guys and boys?
/sarcasm
Again...you are focusing ONLY on male homosexuality... I wonder why....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pamela_Rogers
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debra_Lafave
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/articl...TICLE_ID=53479
-
-
03-21-2008, 08:06 PM #113
-
03-21-2008, 08:11 PM #114
-
03-21-2008, 08:27 PM #115
-
03-21-2008, 09:04 PM #116
-
-
03-22-2008, 01:16 AM #117
-
03-25-2008, 11:05 PM #118
Bookmarks