Reply
Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 121 to 150 of 188
  1. #121
    I'm VitaminVendetta PerpetualMotion's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2007
    Location: London, Ontario, Canada
    Age: 35
    Posts: 6,868
    Rep Power: 21029
    PerpetualMotion has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PerpetualMotion has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PerpetualMotion has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PerpetualMotion has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PerpetualMotion has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PerpetualMotion has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PerpetualMotion has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PerpetualMotion has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PerpetualMotion has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PerpetualMotion has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PerpetualMotion has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    PerpetualMotion is offline
    Originally Posted by Jorge18 View Post
    IIFYM is much easier to remember than CADOMWAMPFWEMAMSAPCEB.
    Flexible dieting is much better than IIFYM. I feel Lyle had it right from the beginning by just calling it flexible dieting. I know some people have qualms with the word "dieting" but it is what it is.
    “Go back?" he thought. "No good at all! Go sideways? Impossible! Go forward? Only thing to do! On we go!" So up he got, and trotted along with his little sword held in front of him and one hand feeling the wall, and his heart all of a patter and a pitter.”
    Reply With Quote

  2. #122
    Registered User ko300zx's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2010
    Location: San Diego, California, United States
    Posts: 13,659
    Rep Power: 183208
    ko300zx has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ko300zx has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ko300zx has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ko300zx has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ko300zx has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ko300zx has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ko300zx has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ko300zx has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ko300zx has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ko300zx has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ko300zx has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    ko300zx is offline
    Originally Posted by Jorge18 View Post
    IIFYM is much easier to remember than CADOMWAMPFWEMAMSAPCEB.
    You would think that not being a fuking idiot and understanding very simple concepts would be easy too....however this acronym has certainly proven that wrong.
    Reply With Quote

  3. #123
    Registered User Jorge18's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2005
    Posts: 171
    Rep Power: 240
    Jorge18 is on a distinguished road. (+10) Jorge18 is on a distinguished road. (+10) Jorge18 is on a distinguished road. (+10) Jorge18 is on a distinguished road. (+10) Jorge18 is on a distinguished road. (+10) Jorge18 is on a distinguished road. (+10) Jorge18 is on a distinguished road. (+10) Jorge18 is on a distinguished road. (+10) Jorge18 is on a distinguished road. (+10) Jorge18 is on a distinguished road. (+10) Jorge18 is on a distinguished road. (+10)
    Jorge18 is offline
    Originally Posted by ko300zx View Post
    You would think that not being a fuking idiot and understanding very simple concepts would be easy too....however this acronym has certainly proven that wrong.
    I agree. You can't hit your macros on ice cream and pop tarts, but you can fit them into your macros with zero ramification.
    Reply With Quote

  4. #124
    Boomer Sooner PhiSig2298's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2011
    Location: Oklahoma, United States
    Posts: 15,088
    Rep Power: 39487
    PhiSig2298 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PhiSig2298 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PhiSig2298 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PhiSig2298 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PhiSig2298 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PhiSig2298 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PhiSig2298 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PhiSig2298 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PhiSig2298 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PhiSig2298 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PhiSig2298 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    PhiSig2298 is offline
    Originally Posted by ErickStevens View Post
    This is new.
    This is all your fault you know that right?
    Reply With Quote

  5. #125
    Banned alan aragon's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2003
    Location: Southern Cali
    Posts: 11,150
    Rep Power: 0
    alan aragon has the mod powerz alan aragon has the mod powerz alan aragon has the mod powerz alan aragon has the mod powerz alan aragon has the mod powerz alan aragon has the mod powerz alan aragon has the mod powerz alan aragon has the mod powerz alan aragon has the mod powerz alan aragon has the mod powerz alan aragon has the mod powerz
    alan aragon is offline

    Thumbs up

    ^lul

    Erick caused the Downfall of Rome.
    Reply With Quote

  6. #126
    Registered User FitnessCPA's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2011
    Age: 39
    Posts: 8,442
    Rep Power: 23560
    FitnessCPA has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) FitnessCPA has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) FitnessCPA has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) FitnessCPA has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) FitnessCPA has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) FitnessCPA has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) FitnessCPA has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) FitnessCPA has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) FitnessCPA has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) FitnessCPA has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) FitnessCPA has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    FitnessCPA is offline
    Originally Posted by PerpetualMotion View Post
    Flexible dieting is much better than IIFYM. I feel Lyle had it right from the beginning by just calling it flexible dieting. I know some people have qualms with the word "dieting" but it is what it is.
    DCA or flexible dieting is a better term.

    I agree that the idiots who choose to eat only cookies and protein powder are dumbasses.

    I just don't like the acronym IIFYM because it just doesn't make much sense if taken literally. But like what has been stated a couple bazillion times already, a little common sense goes a long way.
    Few things are set in stone, except that you have to squat or you are a pussy. - Mark Rippetoe
    Reply With Quote

  7. #127
    Erick wrecked it PR1MO's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2010
    Posts: 4,792
    Rep Power: 25577
    PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    PR1MO is offline
    I liked the part where Alan pointed out that IIFYM is not a "dieting philosophy", it was literally a shorthand answer to a bunch of questions that got posted every day, and then everyone continued to debate the flaws of it as if it was a dieting philosophy. Good reading people.
    FKK - Elastic waisted jeans are fashionable too.

    If you feel bench presses most in your spotter's biceps, you're doing it wrong

    "Don't take diet advice from hippies" - Martin Berkhan
    Reply With Quote

  8. #128
    Chasing cats since 1967 WonderPug's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2010
    Location: New York, New York, United States
    Posts: 52,345
    Rep Power: 323441
    WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    WonderPug is offline
    Originally Posted by PR1MO View Post
    it was literally a shorthand answer to a bunch of questions that got posted every day...
    It was a countermeasure to stupidity, but stupidly won.
    Reply With Quote

  9. #129
    Registered User Chuck2600's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2010
    Location: Canada
    Posts: 12,034
    Rep Power: 22704
    Chuck2600 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Chuck2600 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Chuck2600 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Chuck2600 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Chuck2600 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Chuck2600 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Chuck2600 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Chuck2600 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Chuck2600 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Chuck2600 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Chuck2600 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    Chuck2600 is offline
    Originally Posted by ko300zx View Post
    You would think that not being a fuking idiot and understanding very simple concepts would be easy too....however this acronym has certainly proven that wrong.
    It amazes me that people claim the advantage bro science has over flexible dieting is that it's easier then counting calories and macros. Counting calories, and macros is just that! Plugging in a number on your smart phone and eating a varied diet without obsessing over minute details. Yet your typical bro science takes a few numbers and replaces it with a million and one complicated rules that don't make ANY sense.. But for some reason that's easier for most people....
    Reply With Quote

  10. #130
    Stim Junkie deebee83's Avatar
    Join Date: Aug 2012
    Location: Warwick, Rhode Island, United States
    Posts: 613
    Rep Power: 385
    deebee83 will become famous soon enough. (+50) deebee83 will become famous soon enough. (+50) deebee83 will become famous soon enough. (+50) deebee83 will become famous soon enough. (+50) deebee83 will become famous soon enough. (+50) deebee83 will become famous soon enough. (+50) deebee83 will become famous soon enough. (+50) deebee83 will become famous soon enough. (+50) deebee83 will become famous soon enough. (+50) deebee83 will become famous soon enough. (+50) deebee83 will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    deebee83 is offline
    Originally Posted by determined4000 View Post
    Thought
    IIFYM has ruined the nutrition section.
    Not because of the concept but because of the misunderstanding, misinformation and misuse

    Dont know how many times I have seen, "just hit your macros and eat whatever you want"
    "food choice/quality makes no difference"
    "a carb is a carb"
    :any fat is fine as long as its not trans"
    All of these statements need qualifiers.

    And just saying to take an 80-20 approach does not work either.
    What is one person's percetion of a nutritious food, is not the same as someone else's.
    Oatmeal vs oat bran vs All-bran cereal vs Cheerios vs Honey bunches of oats vs chocolate cheerios vs cocoa puffs vs a fudge poptart vs a chocolate frosted donut
    Where do you draw your line?

    What about they guy in a 20% deficit vs 20% surplus?
    One has far more room for discretionary eating.

    And just because you arent eating more than 20% crap doesnt mean you are getting a good nutrional foundation.
    Claiming to get your vitamins throug a multi rather than fruit/veg/etc, getting all you fat from one source,

    But the worst offense is telling people with crappy nutritional backgrounds who are trying to clean up their diet, that they dont need to as long as macros are hit. The likelihood that they will keep hitting macros if they dont clean up their diet is low if they dont make big changes.

    Note: I am a HUGE Layne fan and agree with most everything he says.
    10/10, would read again
    Reply With Quote

  11. #131
    🅾🅼🅴🅶🅰 🆆🅴🅰🅿🅾🅽 EjnarKolinkar's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2009
    Posts: 20,778
    Rep Power: 132752
    EjnarKolinkar has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) EjnarKolinkar has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) EjnarKolinkar has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) EjnarKolinkar has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) EjnarKolinkar has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) EjnarKolinkar has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) EjnarKolinkar has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) EjnarKolinkar has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) EjnarKolinkar has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) EjnarKolinkar has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) EjnarKolinkar has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    EjnarKolinkar is offline
    Originally Posted by WonderPug View Post
    DCA.

    Now that solves one problem, but it doesn't address the paucity of common sense problem.
    Repped for use of paucity.

    I received IIFYM advice, 80/20 advice, flexible dieting advice from this forum and the usual sources on web. I never felt it the onus of the advisor to leave a disclaimer,"Sir please don't be a moron with your food choices!"

    Those committed to poor diets looking for a way out will find an excuse to eat poorly readily available from so many sources. I don't thing posting on IIFYM needs to become a three page copy and paste contractural agreement with contingency disclaimers for every possible eventuality.
    The most important aspect of weight training; whether for the athlete, bodybuilder, or average person is to better ones health and ability without injury. - Bill Pearl
    Reply With Quote

  12. #132
    USAPL Nut Hugger ErickStevens's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2005
    Location: Sarasota, Florida, United States
    Posts: 24,829
    Rep Power: 80659
    ErickStevens has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) ErickStevens has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) ErickStevens has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) ErickStevens has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) ErickStevens has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) ErickStevens has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) ErickStevens has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) ErickStevens has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) ErickStevens has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) ErickStevens has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) ErickStevens has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000)
    ErickStevens is offline
    Originally Posted by PhiSig2298 View Post
    This is all your fault you know that right?
    Originally Posted by alan aragon View Post
    ^lul

    Erick caused the Downfall of Rome.
    *shrug* At th end of he day, I think the stupid acronym has helped far more people than it's hurt.
    "Nutrition for powerlifting: If you are serious about it, you will eat f*cking everything and get strong as $hit." - HamburgerTrain
    http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=163165741
    Reply With Quote

  13. #133
    Banned The Solution's Avatar
    Join Date: May 2007
    Location: Erie, Pennsylvania, United States
    Age: 35
    Posts: 109,849
    Rep Power: 0
    The Solution has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    The Solution is offline
    Layne just posted this on his ******** wall.

    Good read:

    " fantastic must read blog on why eating 'clean' may not be providing you with as many micronutrients as you think:"

    http://fitterhappierblog.wordpress.c...foods-paradox/


    "Conclusion
    So what is the best way to diet? As is the case with most things in life, I believe moderation is key. When it comes to body composition, the most important factor of the diet (by far) is daily macronutrient intakes. My personal belief is that one should aim to satisfy their daily macronutrient targets (and their target for fiber intake) by choosing an overwhelming majority of micronutrient-dense foods, including plenty of fruits and vegetables. Although I take a multivitamin as a bit of “insurance,” I personally aim to achieve the RDI of all micronutrients from my whole food sources.

    While the majority of foods should be nutrient-dense, I also believe there is nothing wrong with including other foods that would typically be considered “junk food,” as long as micronutrient needs are met and the foods fit within your macronutrient targets for the day. Incorporating such foods in this context will not disrupt your diet in any way, and taking such an approach provides a much higher chance for long-term diet adherence.

    So the take home point is to set appropriate macronutrient targets and use whatever foods you want to hit those targets, as long as daily micronutrient and fiber needs are met. For most people, satisfying these micronutrient and fiber requirements will demand that the majority of food choices will be “cleaner” food sources by default. Once micronutrient and fiber needs are met, knock yourselves out with the elaborate (and very impressive) ice cream and pastry-laden concoctions. And share the recipe."
    Reply With Quote

  14. #134
    Erick wrecked it PR1MO's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2010
    Posts: 4,792
    Rep Power: 25577
    PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    PR1MO is offline
    Originally Posted by The Solution View Post
    Layne just posted this on his ******** wall.

    Good read:

    " fantastic must read blog on why eating 'clean' may not be providing you with as many micronutrients as you think:"

    http://fitterhappierblog.wordpress.c...foods-paradox/


    "Conclusion
    So what is the best way to diet? As is the case with most things in life, I believe moderation is key. When it comes to body composition, the most important factor of the diet (by far) is daily macronutrient intakes. My personal belief is that one should aim to satisfy their daily macronutrient targets (and their target for fiber intake) by choosing an overwhelming majority of micronutrient-dense foods, including plenty of fruits and vegetables. Although I take a multivitamin as a bit of “insurance,” I personally aim to achieve the RDI of all micronutrients from my whole food sources.

    While the majority of foods should be nutrient-dense, I also believe there is nothing wrong with including other foods that would typically be considered “junk food,” as long as micronutrient needs are met and the foods fit within your macronutrient targets for the day. Incorporating such foods in this context will not disrupt your diet in any way, and taking such an approach provides a much higher chance for long-term diet adherence.

    So the take home point is to set appropriate macronutrient targets and use whatever foods you want to hit those targets, as long as daily micronutrient and fiber needs are met. For most people, satisfying these micronutrient and fiber requirements will demand that the majority of food choices will be “cleaner” food sources by default. Once micronutrient and fiber needs are met, knock yourselves out with the elaborate (and very impressive) ice cream and pastry-laden concoctions. And share the recipe."
    He also posted this:

    "Now it's time to take over iTunes"

    So that should end the debate right there.
    FKK - Elastic waisted jeans are fashionable too.

    If you feel bench presses most in your spotter's biceps, you're doing it wrong

    "Don't take diet advice from hippies" - Martin Berkhan
    Reply With Quote

  15. #135
    Registered User rand18m's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2010
    Location: Texas, United States
    Age: 61
    Posts: 4,703
    Rep Power: 4634
    rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    rand18m is offline
    Originally Posted by The Solution View Post
    Layne just posted this on his ******** wall.

    Good read:

    " fantastic must read blog on why eating 'clean' may not be providing you with as many micronutrients as you think:"

    http://fitterhappierblog.wordpress.c...foods-paradox/


    "Conclusion
    So what is the best way to diet? As is the case with most things in life, I believe moderation is key. When it comes to body composition, the most important factor of the diet (by far) is daily macronutrient intakes. My personal belief is that one should aim to satisfy their daily macronutrient targets (and their target for fiber intake) by choosing an overwhelming majority of micronutrient-dense foods, including plenty of fruits and vegetables. Although I take a multivitamin as a bit of “insurance,” I personally aim to achieve the RDI of all micronutrients from my whole food sources.

    While the majority of foods should be nutrient-dense, I also believe there is nothing wrong with including other foods that would typically be considered “junk food,” as long as micronutrient needs are met and the foods fit within your macronutrient targets for the day. Incorporating such foods in this context will not disrupt your diet in any way, and taking such an approach provides a much higher chance for long-term diet adherence.

    So the take home point is to set appropriate macronutrient targets and use whatever foods you want to hit those targets, as long as daily micronutrient and fiber needs are met. For most people, satisfying these micronutrient and fiber requirements will demand that the majority of food choices will be “cleaner” food sources by default. Once micronutrient and fiber needs are met, knock yourselves out with the elaborate (and very impressive) ice cream and pastry-laden concoctions. And share the recipe."
    And the bad thing is this^^ has been said here many times by many people and still it isn't understood as illustrated by the reactions on this thread!

    I'm still looking for the threads/posts where someone talks about eating nothing but ice cream and pastries etc as an entire diet! I've never seen that in this forum, likely cause it's never happened.
    Reply With Quote

  16. #136
    Registered User michaeloey's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2009
    Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
    Age: 35
    Posts: 88
    Rep Power: 180
    michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    michaeloey is offline
    Having watched that, i strongly agreed that it's okay to have treats once in a while as long as u fit it in your macros. However, i firmly believe that quality makes a difference though, a 100 grams of carbs from glucose rich source will have different impact than having the same amount from sucrose, which is gonna be different from a pure fructose, even if the fiber intake is the same. The same thing goes with protein, quality matters as well, getting enough proteins from peanut butter is gonna have different impact on the body than chicken breasts, for instance.
    Reply With Quote

  17. #137
    Erick wrecked it PR1MO's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2010
    Posts: 4,792
    Rep Power: 25577
    PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PR1MO has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    PR1MO is offline
    Originally Posted by michaeloey View Post
    Having watched that, i strongly agreed that it's okay to have treats once in a while as long as u fit it in your macros. However, i firmly believe that quality makes a difference though, a 100 grams of carbs from glucose rich source will have different impact than having the same amount from sucrose, which is gonna be different from a pure fructose, even if the fiber intake is the same. The same thing goes with protein, quality matters as well, getting enough proteins from peanut butter is gonna have different impact on the body than chicken breasts, for instance.
    Your IQ is lower than your rep power
    FKK - Elastic waisted jeans are fashionable too.

    If you feel bench presses most in your spotter's biceps, you're doing it wrong

    "Don't take diet advice from hippies" - Martin Berkhan
    Reply With Quote

  18. #138
    Registered User michaeloey's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2009
    Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
    Age: 35
    Posts: 88
    Rep Power: 180
    michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    michaeloey is offline
    Originally Posted by The Solution View Post
    Layne just posted this on his ********


    "Conclusion
    So what is the best way to diet? As is the case with most things in life, I believe moderation is key. When it comes to body composition, the most important factor of the diet (by far) is daily macronutrient intakes. My personal belief is that one should aim to satisfy their daily macronutrient targets (and their target for fiber intake) by choosing an overwhelming majority of micronutrient-dense foods, including plenty of fruits and vegetables. Although I take a multivitamin as a bit of “insurance,” I personally aim to achieve the RDI of all micronutrients from my whole food sources.

    While the majority of foods should be nutrient-dense, I also believe there is nothing wrong with including other foods that would typically be considered “junk food,” as long as micronutrient needs are met and the foods fit within your macronutrient targets for the day. Incorporating such foods in this context will not disrupt your diet in any way, and taking such an approach provides a much higher chance for long-term diet adherence.

    So the take home point is to set appropriate macronutrient targets and use whatever foods you want to hit those targets, as long as daily micronutrient and fiber needs are met. For most people, satisfying these micronutrient and fiber requirements will demand that the majority of food choices will be “cleaner” food sources by default. Once micronutrient and fiber needs are met, knock yourselves out with the elaborate (and very impressive) ice cream and pastry-laden concoctions. And share the recipe."
    Even if u hit daily RDA for fiber n various micros, u still have to account in differences of food quality, a body responds differently to glucose as it does to fructose and consuming trans fat is not the same thing with consuming saturated fatty acid, which is again different from consuming poly unsaturated fatty acids.......
    Reply With Quote

  19. #139
    Registered User michaeloey's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2009
    Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
    Age: 35
    Posts: 88
    Rep Power: 180
    michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) michaeloey has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    michaeloey is offline
    Originally Posted by PR1MO View Post
    Your IQ is lower than your rep power
    Oh yeah, wanna try n test my IQ?? Try n disprove what i just posted, see if that's possible from a sad and miserable brainless brawn, like urself.......
    Reply With Quote

  20. #140
    Team Bacon necon76's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2010
    Location: Australia
    Posts: 19,301
    Rep Power: 150094
    necon76 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) necon76 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) necon76 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) necon76 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) necon76 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) necon76 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) necon76 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) necon76 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) necon76 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) necon76 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) necon76 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    necon76 is offline
    Originally Posted by michaeloey View Post
    Oh yeah, wanna try n test my IQ?? Try n disprove what i just posted, see if that's possible from a sad and miserable brainless brawn, like urself.......


    LMAO. I like this guy.
    Delirious Mutant.
    Reply With Quote

  21. #141
    Registered User 0kz's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2013
    Location: Italy
    Posts: 297
    Rep Power: 271
    0kz will become famous soon enough. (+50) 0kz will become famous soon enough. (+50) 0kz will become famous soon enough. (+50) 0kz will become famous soon enough. (+50) 0kz will become famous soon enough. (+50) 0kz will become famous soon enough. (+50) 0kz will become famous soon enough. (+50) 0kz will become famous soon enough. (+50) 0kz will become famous soon enough. (+50) 0kz will become famous soon enough. (+50) 0kz will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    0kz is offline
    Originally Posted by michaeloey View Post
    Oh yeah, wanna try n test my IQ?? Try n disprove what i just posted, see if that's possible from a sad and miserable brainless brawn, like urself.......
    But bro you are red
    bulking !
    Reply With Quote

  22. #142
    At the Nutrition Section BroFoods's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2013
    Posts: 127
    Rep Power: 243
    BroFoods will become famous soon enough. (+50) BroFoods will become famous soon enough. (+50) BroFoods will become famous soon enough. (+50) BroFoods will become famous soon enough. (+50) BroFoods will become famous soon enough. (+50) BroFoods will become famous soon enough. (+50) BroFoods will become famous soon enough. (+50) BroFoods will become famous soon enough. (+50) BroFoods will become famous soon enough. (+50) BroFoods will become famous soon enough. (+50) BroFoods will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    BroFoods is offline
    Originally Posted by 0kz View Post
    But bro you are red
    Rep doesn't really matter, he could of been negged simply for disagreeing with someone.
    Reply With Quote

  23. #143
    Registered User ApolloD's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2010
    Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
    Age: 32
    Posts: 533
    Rep Power: 537
    ApolloD has a spectacular aura about. (+250) ApolloD has a spectacular aura about. (+250) ApolloD has a spectacular aura about. (+250) ApolloD has a spectacular aura about. (+250) ApolloD has a spectacular aura about. (+250) ApolloD has a spectacular aura about. (+250) ApolloD has a spectacular aura about. (+250) ApolloD has a spectacular aura about. (+250) ApolloD has a spectacular aura about. (+250) ApolloD has a spectacular aura about. (+250) ApolloD has a spectacular aura about. (+250)
    ApolloD is offline
    @Michaeloey, I don't think it's the difference in actual food that is of concern but rather that person's response to a certain type of food. See my earlier post
    Reply With Quote

  24. #144
    Registered User doyoueveneat's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2011
    Age: 34
    Posts: 3,613
    Rep Power: 928
    doyoueveneat is a jewel in the rough. (+500) doyoueveneat is a jewel in the rough. (+500) doyoueveneat is a jewel in the rough. (+500) doyoueveneat is a jewel in the rough. (+500) doyoueveneat is a jewel in the rough. (+500) doyoueveneat is a jewel in the rough. (+500) doyoueveneat is a jewel in the rough. (+500) doyoueveneat is a jewel in the rough. (+500) doyoueveneat is a jewel in the rough. (+500) doyoueveneat is a jewel in the rough. (+500) doyoueveneat is a jewel in the rough. (+500)
    doyoueveneat is offline
    Originally Posted by michaeloey View Post
    Having watched that, i strongly agreed that it's okay to have treats once in a while as long as u fit it in your macros. However, i firmly believe that quality makes a difference though, a 100 grams of carbs from glucose rich source will have different impact than having the same amount from sucrose, which is gonna be different from a pure fructose, even if the fiber intake is the same. The same thing goes with protein, quality matters as well, getting enough proteins from peanut butter is gonna have different impact on the body than chicken breasts, for instance.
    could it be that the macros and micros for those sources will be different?

    100g carbs from a glucose rich source...aka bread is going to have different macros and micros compared to sucrose.

    pure fructose infusion is going to have different micros and macros to a banana

    peanut butter is going to have different micros and macros to chicken breast.
    Reply With Quote

  25. #145
    Registered User naturalguy's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2003
    Location: New York, United States
    Posts: 34,428
    Rep Power: 275264
    naturalguy has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) naturalguy has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) naturalguy has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) naturalguy has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) naturalguy has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) naturalguy has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) naturalguy has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) naturalguy has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) naturalguy has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) naturalguy has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) naturalguy has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    naturalguy is offline
    Originally Posted by The Solution View Post
    Layne just posted this on his ******** wall.

    Good read:

    " fantastic must read blog on why eating 'clean' may not be providing you with as many micronutrients as you think:"

    http://fitterhappierblog.wordpress.c...foods-paradox/


    "Conclusion
    So what is the best way to diet? As is the case with most things in life, I believe moderation is key. When it comes to body composition, the most important factor of the diet (by far) is daily macronutrient intakes. My personal belief is that one should aim to satisfy their daily macronutrient targets (and their target for fiber intake) by choosing an overwhelming majority of micronutrient-dense foods, including plenty of fruits and vegetables. Although I take a multivitamin as a bit of “insurance,” I personally aim to achieve the RDI of all micronutrients from my whole food sources.

    While the majority of foods should be nutrient-dense, I also believe there is nothing wrong with including other foods that would typically be considered “junk food,” as long as micronutrient needs are met and the foods fit within your macronutrient targets for the day. Incorporating such foods in this context will not disrupt your diet in any way, and taking such an approach provides a much higher chance for long-term diet adherence.

    So the take home point is to set appropriate macronutrient targets and use whatever foods you want to hit those targets, as long as daily micronutrient and fiber needs are met. For most people, satisfying these micronutrient and fiber requirements will demand that the majority of food choices will be “cleaner” food sources by default. Once micronutrient and fiber needs are met, knock yourselves out with the elaborate (and very impressive) ice cream and pastry-laden concoctions. And share the recipe."
    So the take home message is eat more, what you guys call, "bro" foods
    Free Agent

    Instagram.com/naturalguy2.0
    Reply With Quote

  26. #146
    Team Bacon necon76's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2010
    Location: Australia
    Posts: 19,301
    Rep Power: 150094
    necon76 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) necon76 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) necon76 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) necon76 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) necon76 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) necon76 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) necon76 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) necon76 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) necon76 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) necon76 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) necon76 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    necon76 is offline
    Originally Posted by naturalguy View Post
    So the take home message is eat more, what you guys call, "bro" foods

    Whilst not being afraid to include anything else you enjoy, within reason. Pretty simple really.
    Delirious Mutant.
    Reply With Quote

  27. #147
    Chasing cats since 1967 WonderPug's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2010
    Location: New York, New York, United States
    Posts: 52,345
    Rep Power: 323441
    WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    WonderPug is offline
    Originally Posted by naturalguy View Post
    So the take home message is eat more, what you guys call, "bro" foods
    Not exactly, for two reasons:

    1. It's not the individual food selections, in isolation and sans context, that matters. Rather, it's the specific dose and combination of foods that determine the sufficiency of nutrient intake and the calibration of energy intake to goals. And it's the sufficiency of nutrient intake and energy calibration that is paramount.

    2. Many folks that profess to consume "bro"/"clean" diets consume large amounts of processed fast food in the form of protein shakes and other supplements (which I presume they would call "bro" or "clean" food), where ideally the (vast) majority of one's nutrient intake should be derived from whole and minimally processed foods.
    Reply With Quote

  28. #148
    Boomer Sooner PhiSig2298's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2011
    Location: Oklahoma, United States
    Posts: 15,088
    Rep Power: 39487
    PhiSig2298 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PhiSig2298 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PhiSig2298 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PhiSig2298 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PhiSig2298 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PhiSig2298 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PhiSig2298 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PhiSig2298 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PhiSig2298 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PhiSig2298 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PhiSig2298 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    PhiSig2298 is offline
    2 quest bars + a multi... All bases covered to eat 8 pop tarts and 6 scoops of whey. IIFYM.
    Reply With Quote

  29. #149
    Registered User rand18m's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2010
    Location: Texas, United States
    Age: 61
    Posts: 4,703
    Rep Power: 4634
    rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    rand18m is offline
    Originally Posted by WonderPug View Post
    Not exactly, for two reasons:

    1. It's not the individual food selections, in isolation and sans context, that matters. Rather, it's the specific dose and combination of foods that determine the sufficiency of nutrient intake and the calibration of energy intake to goals. And it's the sufficiency of nutrient intake and energy calibration that is paramount.

    2. Many folks that profess to consume "bro"/"clean" diets consume large amounts of processed fast food in the form of protein shakes and other supplements (which I presume they would call "bro" or "clean" food), where ideally the (vast) majority of one's nutrient intake should be derived from whole and minimally processed foods.
    Pug it has become abundantly clear in this thread that many, or most, don't have a grasp on what is "clean" or "dirty" food, or "bro" foods or whatever stupid moniker people want to put on food products. This apparently is the case even with some of the more knowledgable posters. The idea that we discuss foods in isolation instead of the composition of peoples diets is mind blowing. You would think people on this forum as a whole would be more knowledgable than that!

    For example the silliness of a "carb is not a carb" nonsense. I would be more receptive to that discussion if they said something like, "a saccharide is not a saccharide", well maybe then we could discuss the metabolism of those differences, but to say a carb is not a carb is not helpful to anyone. (somehow free glucose and that contained in sucrose are different)

    This entire argument is quite dumb really, but it does appear many like the argument because they have been doing so for years!

    So for those that think sucrose and other such disaccharides constitute a threat to a bodybuilding diet then abstain, for those that don't and like including sucrose in your diet, then do so, with proper calibration you'll be fine. (for some reason people around here think everyone is insulin resistance)

    For those that are convinced that fat is dirty, then stay on the low end of fat consumption, but don't take your phobia too far, because very low fat WILL be detrimental to your goals, however it's very hard to eat very low fat consistently unless you are a veggie or some such extreme dieter.

    In the meantime, as Layne and even Pug above suggests, compose a diet that meets all your bodies requirements, do so with foods you enjoy, preferably from as many whole foods as possible, within the energy balance parameters you chose for stated goals and you'll do fine and remain sane. For those whom sanity doesn't appeal, continue to tell yourself that some foods are evil and keep your diet restricted, you'll be happier that way. That comment is not meant to be disparaging, many that engage in bodybuilding are obsessive by nature, that's ok unless you think everyone else should be that way too! Good luck everyone!
    Last edited by rand18m; 02-02-2013 at 07:01 PM.
    Reply With Quote

  30. #150
    Registered User midcoastking33's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2008
    Location: United States
    Posts: 28,110
    Rep Power: 69004
    midcoastking33 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) midcoastking33 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) midcoastking33 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) midcoastking33 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) midcoastking33 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) midcoastking33 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) midcoastking33 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) midcoastking33 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) midcoastking33 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) midcoastking33 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) midcoastking33 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    midcoastking33 is offline
    Originally Posted by PR1MO View Post
    I liked the part where Alan pointed out that IIFYM is not a "dieting philosophy", it was literally a shorthand answer to a bunch of questions that got posted every day, and then everyone continued to debate the flaws of it as if it was a dieting philosophy. Good reading people.
    I was the first to mention this, alan stole muh thunder
    Reply With Quote

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts