http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...-shootings-map
Are there more pros to tightening up gun laws against the argument that; it's in our constitution, too many guns to do anything, etc etc.
If you are sick of these threads then don't bother commenting. I'm just curious to hear some solid arguments from either side as I haven't given it much thought..
|
-
12-15-2012, 05:39 AM #1
62 mass shootings since 1982? Enter at your own risk
-
12-15-2012, 05:41 AM #2
-
12-15-2012, 05:56 AM #3
-
12-15-2012, 07:05 AM #4
- Join Date: Feb 2009
- Location: United States
- Age: 36
- Posts: 16,944
- Rep Power: 40280
Less individualized society, reduced wealth/opportunity gap, greater social safety nets. There are some of the greatest preventions against violence. For those who are truly against violence, here are some things that deserve attention.
But, people don't really pay much attention to mental health in America. Can't expect them to look at this issue deeper than new regulation/de-regulation on the guns used to commit atrocities rather than the mentality which initiates it.All of humanity's problems stem from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone.
-
-
12-15-2012, 07:06 AM #5
-
12-15-2012, 07:16 AM #6
- Join Date: Feb 2009
- Location: United States
- Age: 36
- Posts: 16,944
- Rep Power: 40280
Don't I know it. That's why these people are "crazy" and have "chemical imbalances" in their brain, because in reality, they are products of our society and if we admit that then we are admitting that our societal construction is remarkably flawed. Probably further fuel for the highly individualized nature of America, where everyone is their own responsibility and nothing else outside of oneself should have a bearing on one's actions, emotions, cognition, etc. (big myth).
Individualized society --> ostracized people --> mental disorders --> violence --> reaffirmation that such folks needed to take responsibility for themselves (maybe even through legislative change of some kind, creating greater disparity between the classes) --> further ostracized people --> further mental disorders --> further violence --> repeat
If we are to acknowledge why these events happen and what forces give rise to such mindsets then we are simultaneously calling for drastic social overhaul to amend our horribly developed state. Who wants to acknowledge that the society they have built/supported is what causes these events to happen? No one. So we just call them crazy, assign this to unbalanced brain chemicals, call for greater/stronger medication, and repeat the process.All of humanity's problems stem from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone.
-
12-15-2012, 08:54 AM #7
-
12-15-2012, 08:59 AM #8
-
-
12-15-2012, 09:31 AM #9
How come no one is talking about the obvious issue here? The gunman was mentally ill. Perhaps we should be discussing how our society deals with mental illness. If this kid received proper help whether it was in the form of treatment or being put in a place where he can be monitored and not be a threat to himself and others then perhaps this event would have been prevented.
-
12-15-2012, 09:34 AM #10
-
12-15-2012, 09:57 AM #11
-
12-15-2012, 09:59 AM #12
- Join Date: Aug 2010
- Location: Michigan, United States
- Posts: 9,830
- Rep Power: 4165
there's a gun culture... people hunt, target shoot, take pride in ownership & gun safety
its american tradition
guns are not responsible for the destruction caused by psychopaths. is alcohol responsible for the destruction caused by drunk drivers?
guns keep this country safe. the more guns there are, the less power each gun has
gun laws would only affect people who are willing to abide by them(does not include murderers)
so basically, more gun restriction = less guns for good people, but the same amount of guns for bad people
the REAL problem is, too FEW people are armed... killers target schools & malls because the people there have no guns to shoot back... a killer would be put down almost immediately upon attacking a police station, gun range or other location full of well-armed RESPONSIBLE individuals
take away guns from the people of a land, that land becomes defenseless
also, you're not going to cure the fundamental ills of society by banning something... brb SOME people get addicted to alcohol & drive drunk...lets ban alcohol, disregarding the privilege of the majority of people who drink responsiblyThe muscles i value most are the ones directly surrounding the spine, the hips, the scapula, the femur and the tibia... in that order.
Basically the whole body minus chest and biceps... pretty much the opposite of what your local gym looks like on a typical Monday.
-
-
12-15-2012, 10:11 AM #13
-
12-15-2012, 10:16 AM #14
- Join Date: Feb 2009
- Location: United States
- Age: 36
- Posts: 16,944
- Rep Power: 40280
See, it sounds like you're assuming the most successful battle in deterring such crimes takes place when the event occurs. That is, the best defense from gun crime is more guns to diminish the harm upon the event arising. In reality, the real deterrent needs to happen long before the manifestation of the thought, "I want to cause harm to others."
All of humanity's problems stem from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone.
-
12-15-2012, 02:49 PM #15
- Join Date: Aug 2010
- Location: Michigan, United States
- Posts: 9,830
- Rep Power: 4165
that's a good theory, and has potential to prevent violence from happening in the first place
but putting that solution into action is a tall order. its much easier to defend yourself than instill a change of heart unto the perpetrators
steps to minimize/discourage serial kililng should be taken... but until its no longer a threat, we better beef up securityThe muscles i value most are the ones directly surrounding the spine, the hips, the scapula, the femur and the tibia... in that order.
Basically the whole body minus chest and biceps... pretty much the opposite of what your local gym looks like on a typical Monday.
-
12-15-2012, 03:02 PM #16
-
-
12-15-2012, 03:52 PM #17
-
12-16-2012, 05:08 AM #18
Can't remember if I commented in the other thread, just saw in the OP that he didn't want it to be a back and forth between pro/anti guns.
Can you explain what you mean by this? Isn't society the exact opposite - most people don't think for themselves and are hardly considered 'individualised'. Perhaps we need a more individualised society, but I think you're talking about the "everybody for themselves" mindset?
Does this disorganisation rustle your jimmies? And also I only saw one other thread that said it wasn't about a pro/anti gun debate.
-
12-16-2012, 05:12 AM #19
-
12-16-2012, 05:14 AM #20
-
-
12-16-2012, 05:16 AM #21
Society is a tricky business mayne;P Whose responsibility is it to help these people? If he refuses care should he be forcefully committed? The more freedom we have the more responsibility we have, and it seems society can't handle either of those things very well.
I think a movement of some sort needs to happen to aware people on mental health issues and how we can deal with it everyday.
Thanks for the contribution.
-
12-16-2012, 05:17 AM #22
-
12-16-2012, 05:18 AM #23
-
12-16-2012, 05:26 AM #24
- Join Date: Nov 2008
- Location: New York, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 4,013
- Rep Power: 1392
You can apply that reasoning to owning a gun.In 2011, 9,878 people died in drunk driving crashes - one every 53 minutes, from MADD.org. My point being is we shouldn't take away everyone's right to drink or own a firearm because of irresponsible/immoral people. Should only criminals be allowed to own weapons bought from the black market?
"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty." – Thomas Jefferson
Ron Paul 16' R[̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅]ution
NY Rangers-Jets-Mets
***Viking Crew***
-
-
12-16-2012, 05:54 AM #25
- Join Date: Aug 2010
- Location: Michigan, United States
- Posts: 9,830
- Rep Power: 4165
yes. think for yourself and consider the needs of others
with popular topics, its either 1 thread with 50 pages in the first day
or 50 threads with 1 page
hard to organize it... and also there's slight differences between OP's objective for a thread(example: OP #1 wants to discuss pro/anti gun, OP #2 wants to rant about some nonsense, yet OP #3 wants to mourn the losses) so its hard to consolidate for a variety of reasons(different OP objectives, people don't search before posting, etc.)The muscles i value most are the ones directly surrounding the spine, the hips, the scapula, the femur and the tibia... in that order.
Basically the whole body minus chest and biceps... pretty much the opposite of what your local gym looks like on a typical Monday.
-
12-16-2012, 06:18 AM #26
-
12-16-2012, 07:04 AM #27
You're comparing alcohol to guns when you should really be comparing the car to guns. The car is the tool which was used to kill in the incident just like the gun is the weapon to kill. The difference is, cars were designed for transportation and guns were designed to kill. Also, drunk drivers don't intentionally kill people, whereas when people shoot other people, the intention is to kill as that is what the weapon was designed for.
Sports Science & Health Undergraduate
You don't always get what you wish for,
You get what you work for.
Bite off more than you can chew,
Then Chew it!
Twitter: @MarkGermaine
"It's at the borders of pain and suffering that the men are separated from the boys." - Emil Zatopek
-
12-16-2012, 07:07 AM #28
- Join Date: Aug 2010
- Location: Michigan, United States
- Posts: 9,830
- Rep Power: 4165
-
-
12-16-2012, 07:19 AM #29
-
12-16-2012, 11:02 AM #30
- Join Date: Aug 2010
- Location: Michigan, United States
- Posts: 9,830
- Rep Power: 4165
Bookmarks