Yah..9/11 no explosives? COME AT ME BRO!

[realistromeo]

I'll just leave this here.




yah

[956Moe]

I'll just leave this here.




yah

in on 1st page. and end will this will not

[mithfen]

You've proven everyone wrong. You have won life.

Please go collect your prize.

[PataciumEyeOdin]

Buildings were closed 6 months before for rennovations, government had motive, and opportunity and skill to demo the buildings. In a court of law thats all you need to prove a crime

[7rmr]

It is almost as if when a massive building collapses on its self there is a tremendous amount of force projected downwards. Then, it is almost as if the pressure that said force creates exerts its self outward in all directions. Strange, I wonder if scientists have ever wondered about whether an increase in pressure in a confined space will press outwards in all directions.

[7rmr]

Buildings were closed 6 months before for rennovations, government had motive, and opportunity and skill to demo the buildings. In a court of law thats all you need to prove a crime

Yup, and that is why you are an idiot. None of those things can prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt.

[r0gue6]

It is almost as if when a massive building collapses on its self there is a tremendous amount of force projected downwards. Then, it is almost as if the pressure that said force creates exerts its self outward in all directions. Strange, I wonder if scientists have ever wondered about whether an increase in pressure in a confined space will press outwards in all directions.

lol, yeah man.

Ive watched controlled demos, and they look NOTHING like a building collapsing on itself.

In that video, there are no explosives at all shown, so I'm not sure why the video was posted.

[mithfen]

It is almost as if when a massive building collapses on its self there is a tremendous amount of force projected downwards. Then, it is almost as if the pressure that said force creates exerts its self outward in all directions. Strange, I wonder if scientists have ever wondered about whether an increase in pressure in a confined space will press outwards in all directions.

I have been a structural engineer for 482 years and discredit your analysis.

[7rmr]

In that video, there are no explosives at all shown, so I'm not sure why the video was posted.

Unless of course the OP was retarded.

[US_Ranger]

It is almost as if when a massive building collapses on its self there is a tremendous amount of force projected downwards. Then, it is almost as if the pressure that said force creates exerts its self outward in all directions. Strange, I wonder if scientists have ever wondered about whether an increase in pressure in a confined space will press outwards in all directions.

/thread

Another CT waste.

[kusok]

It is almost as if when a massive building collapses on its self there is a tremendous amount of force projected downwards. Then, it is almost as if the pressure that said force creates exerts its self outward in all directions. Strange, I wonder if scientists have ever wondered about whether an increase in pressure in a confined space will press outwards in all directions.

Problem is there was no downward pressure, because cement was incinerated so that some of it almost made it to New Jersey, there are videos of first responders wondering where is the cement... In fact on one of the towers the top collapsed sideways and thus did not have the even downward pressure, yet the building kept collapsing evenly...

Some large steel pieces were ejected long distances. Look at it bro. Those are detonations. open your eyes.

Where are the pancaked floors?...

Look at the credibility of US government, 60'000 Americans died in Vietnam, it is now known that Gulf of Tonkin was a lie, they have now come out and said that they lied to lead a nation into war... You see a pattern here?

[PataciumEyeOdin]

Problem is there was no downward pressure, because cement was incinerated so that some of it almost made it to New Jersey, there are videos of first responders wondering where is the cement... In fact on one of the towers the top collapsed sideways and thus did not have the even downward pressure, yet the building kept collapsing evenly...

Some large steel pieces were ejected long distances. Look at it bro. Those are detonations. open your eyes.

Where are the pancaked floors?...


Look at the credibility of US government, 60'000 Americans died in Vietnam, it is now known that Gulf of Tonkin was a lie, they have now come out and said that they lied to lead a nation into war... You see a pattern here?

its ok cause fires can bring down a building (#7) in the manor of a perfectly controlled demo, so all demo crews will just be using fire from now on LMFAO!!! baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

[mithfen]

Look at the credibility of US government, 60'000 Americans died in Vietnam, it is now known that Gulf of Tonkin was a lie, they have now come out and said that they lied to lead a nation into war... You see a pattern here?

Suggesting that these scenarios are analogous to the U.S. govt supposedly attacking innocent and non military citizens isn't very fair.

[Thomas7669]

tbh that doesnt really look like a controlled demolition to me, if you look closely when it goes into slow mo, especially towards the bottom of the screen.

Seriously go on youtube and search for controlled demolitions and see for yourself.

[PataciumEyeOdin]

tbh that doesnt really look like a controlled demolition to me, if you look closely when it goes into slow mo, especially towards the bottom of the screen.

Seriously go on youtube and search for controlled demolitions and see for yourself.

lol @ this kid, u musta never seen a controlled demo

i do em for a living son

[Thomas7669]

lol @ this kid, u musta never seen a controlled demo

i do em for a living son

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79sJ1bMR6VQ

why does that look different from the way the towers fell? Why wasnt there noises like in that video when the towers fell? Why is everyone suddenly an expert in everything? Why does everyone claiming to be an expert in a field think it gives them 100% authority when there are plenty of other demolition people who say that the way the towers fell doesnt imply it was a demolition? Go ahead do a google search. In fact a bunch of them say its unlikely because of how long it takes to rig a building half the size of one tower for demolition with full access. About 6 months is usually the figure used. Now imagine a building the size of the towers. Now imagined rigging two of those building in secret.

If you look at my post history you will see I have questions about 9/11. That being said the controlled demolition theory is garbage.

[Thomas7669]

no counter argument to my argument from realistromeo yet he negs me. No surprise there.

[Bushmaster]

OP weren't you the one who said there weren't any planes on 9/11?

Edit:

I'm begining to think there actualy were no planes! lol pentagon there was no (discenable) video of a plane, then you got those crazy swooping shots of planes comming down at unreal angles. why would they lose the planes on radar? do American choppers going into Pakistan simply turn off their transponders to aviod detection...LOL I AM GOING WAY OFF POINT HERE

[CrazyTall]

OP you might have video proof, but I have emotional faith in our government, and that wins every time. I choose not to believe what I see. Arabs with box cutters, that's all I know.

[Bushmaster]

OP you might have video proof.

Did you even watch the video? He doesn't have proof.

[NiceBoat]

lol @ this kid, u musta never seen a controlled demo

i do em for a living son

And I created the xbox and bang super models for a living.

[CrazyTall]

Did you even watch the video? He doesn't have proof.

yes i watched it along with 100 other vids that all show clearly that the planes did not cause the buildings (including tower 7) to implode in the exact same fashion as a controlled demolition. The least you should do is question all the blatant discrepancies in the official story. Its called critical thinking. I dont blame people for not wanting to believe it was an inside job. I just hate when people blindly refuse to accept the facts. Not directing that at you, because I dont know you, but just in general.

[flairon]

I did explosives and demo for 4 years in the military. We did countless controlled demos and its more or less a hobby of mine. That was not a controlled demo.

. This is just 10 stories, listen to the explosions that happen. There would be no mistaking this for a 'pop'..especially considering that the girders of the WTC were probably more numerous and larger

This is only 12 stories in texas...notice the lines of flashes when the explosions go off and the sound echoing through the city


This is what a building looks like that is prepped for a controlled demo. Notice how there are no walls,furniture, door frames..nothing but the skeleton of the building. If you dont do this prep, you can't accurately figure out where that building is going to go because as it falls, all that crap starts piling up and as it piles up the strength of those items starts increasing and throws off the trajectory of the fall

A controlled detonation of a building to bring it down within its own footprint is practically a scientific art form. You dont just slap det cord on the girders and hit the button. It takes weeks to prep the building, the explosives have to be detonated in a certain pattern and if things like the internal support walls of the building are removed to take out the variable for a drop it is only logical that the body of a commerical aircraft that is on fire would probably also be a variable that would make the fall uncontrollable.


It wasn't explosives..get over it.

[Bushmaster]

yes i watched it along with 100 other vids that all show clearly that the planes did not cause the buildings (including tower 7) to implode in the exact same fashion as a controlled demolition. The least you should do is question all the blatant discrepancies in the official story. Its called critical thinking. I dont blame people for not wanting to believe it was an inside job. I just hate when people blindly refuse to accept the facts.

What facts?

Surely not the "proof" in the OP's vid?

[7rmr]

Problem is there was no downward pressure,

I'm sorry I can stop reading right there. No downward pressure? Really?

[kusok]

I'm sorry I can stop reading right there. No downward pressure? Really?

Really. You should have kept reading.

[kusok]

Suggesting that these scenarios are analogous to the U.S. govt supposedly attacking innocent and non military citizens isn't very fair.

US government has a long history of attacking civilians. As well as a long history of lying and getting into wars based on lies.

[7rmr]

Really. You should have kept reading.

So the large dust cloud that spread outwards after the towers collapsed, you are arguing that was not caused by pressure?

[kusok]

So the large dust cloud that spread outwards after the towers collapsed, you are arguing that was not caused by pressure?

You should have kept reading

Several times...

let's try again bro *sigh*

There was no cement... There was supposed to be 110 floors worth of it, yet it turned into dust... Think bro, use your head... for the love of Christ use your head man.

Watch Gage's film, he shows how one of the towers top fell to the side a bit, yet the building kept collapsing evenly... That makes absolutely no sense at all. The absence of cement means there was no downward pressure, no even pressure (top fell over to side a bit) and not enough pressure (the low and middle of the building was NOT damaged or weakened by fire.

There were no pancaked floors on the bottom... as always HAS TO be the case in a collapse. etc.

Use your head, think. Watch the film, take your TIME to watch it.

[r0gue6]

You should have kept reading

Several times...

let's try again bro *sigh*

There was no cement... There was supposed to be 110 floors worth of it, yet it turned into dust... Think bro, use your head... for the love of Christ use your head man.

Watch Gage's film, he shows how one of the towers top fell to the side a bit, yet the building kept collapsing evenly... That makes absolutely no sense at all. The absence of cement means there was no downward pressure, no even pressure (top fell over to side a bit) and not enough pressure (the low and middle of the building was NOT damaged or weakened by fire.

There were no pancaked floors on the bottom... as always HAS TO be the case in a collapse. etc.

Use your head, think. Watch the film, take your TIME to watch it.

I'd hate to be 35 and a complete moron.

How many tower collapses are you comparing this to?