|
Why can't I help but notice the writer mentions how things have changed, and how it used to be about passion and heart, yet I can recall countless, subtle, but obvious marketing attempts from her company in the article.
I don't think the article had any relevent information. We all know prize money sucks, we know the women divisions are useless, and it seemed like a downright, stereotyping agruement about hiding hairloss and undermining the hardwork most pro's dedicate themselves too.
The author was right, she wasn't an athelete, therefor she should stick to writing about breast implants and bikini shows.
|