I want to smack the fool who wrote this article! It's people like you who are uneducated and retarded who cant even understant what they post, and it's a shame that BODYBUILDING.COM let's this fools post information. First who starts an article like that?
"Welcome back Science Warriors! If you recall, we were forced to leave our workhorse GI in the midst of rampant verbiage that threatens its current hard-hitting status as a means of monitoring blood glucose levels. The attacks are frequent, fast, and furious! So we parry to bide much needed recovery time; we ask our opponents “So just what do YOU propose? What are the ALTERNATIVES? What is the SOLUTION?” Bobbing and weaving, quickly and fluently, these bellicose foes are quite willing to counterpunch…hook to the body, and straight to the head!"
I BET HE DOSENT EVEN KNOW WHAT THOSE WORD MEAN!!!
NOW LET ME GIVE YOU 100% PROOF THAT Todd Reinhard IS A TODD RETARD. FIRST HE SAYS " the GI is an index that measures the rate at which blood glucose levels rise in response to a 200 calorie portion of a particular food relative to the rate at which the same amount of either raw glucose or plain white bread will raise blood glucose levels." NO YOU ARE WRONG G.I. IS MEASURED BY TAKING IN 50 GRAMS OF CARBOHYDRATES OF A PARTICULAR FOOD V.S. 50 GRAMS OF CARBOHYDRATES OF GLUCOSE OR WHITE BREAD. NOT 200 GRAMS. IF LET'S SAY I WAS MEASURING 50 GRAMS CARBS OF PASTA COMPATED TO 50 GRAMS OF GLUCOSE. I WOULD HAVE TO LOOK AT THE BOX OF PAST AND YOU SO MUCH GRAMS OF IT TO GET 50 CARBS MEANING IF 250GRAMS OF PASTA GAVE ME 50 CARBS THEN I EAT 250 GRAMS OF PASTA OF IT WAS 300 GRAMS THAT GAVE ME 50 CARBS THEN I WOULD EAT 300 GRAMS. THE REST OF THE INFO IN THE ARTICLE THE RETARD GOT FROM THE FRONT PAGE OF THIS SITE
http://www.glycemicindex.com/ I DONT THINK HE EVEN LOOKED AROUND. THE SITE EVEN STATES Glycemic load = GI (%) x grams of carbohydrate per serving, YOU SEE RETARD GRAMS OF CARBS. WHAT FOOLS OPERATE ISSA? HERE IS A MORE DETAILED CITE AND EXPLANATION
http://diabetes.about.com/library/me...nmendosagi.htm
The glycemic index is about the quality of the carbohydrates, not the quantity. Obviously, quantity matters too—and that is the reason for the glycemic load values—but the measurement of the glycemic index of a food is not related to portion size. It remains the same whether you eat 10 grams of it or 1000 grams. That's because to make a fair comparison tests of the glycemic indexes of food usually use 50 grams of available carbohydrate in each food. You can eat twice as many carbohydrates in a food that, for example, has a glycemic index of 50 than one that has a glycemic index of 100 and have the same blood glucose response.
THEN HE ALSO SAYS "A carrot has a very high GI value of 131. "
IF GLUCOSE AND WHITE BREAD THE HIGHEST WHICH IS G.I. OF 100 HOW DID HE GET 131 FOR CARROT? I WISH MIKE TYSON WOULD KNOCK HIM OUT FOR HIS BULL****. IT SHOULD BE HIM IN THERE GETING PUNCHED. IT'S COCKSUCKERS LIKE TODD WHO **** THINGS UP ALL THE TIME I SWEAR I WOULD SMACK HIM IF I HAD THE CHANCE YOU A DUMBASS TODD STAY OUT OF BODYBUILDING.COM
Linear Mode
