Sean Nal - Highly Intensive Training (HIT)!

[webmaster]

Learn how to finally start gain lean mass by utilizing HIT. Find out how it can help you gain new muscle, add weights consistenly and much more...

http://www.teenbodybuilding.com/sean12.htm

HOW TO REVIEW: Post Your Review Of This Article - CLICK ON POST REPLY BELOW! You do NOT need to be a registered member to post a reply in this section!

[adonis]

i dunno mate i guess ill give it a shot...
but im not a fan of HIT

the pros dont use it either...

[initabath]

thank God someone on this site actually preaches HIT

** 45 minutes - MAX-OT. HIT workouts are HIGH intensity, which means that those workouts should take no more than 15 minutes to do

** Workout in my opinion needs alot more thinking put into it - I.E
- bent over rows on day 2 after an already heavy back day

just simple thinkgs like that

but overall there is no mention of the best things about HIT I.E negatives in particular as well as static contractions


overall, though pretty cool

[Maxima98 GXE]

Originally posted by adonis
i dunno mate i guess ill give it a shot...
but im not a fan of HIT

the pros dont use it either...

The pros are also juiced to the gills.

[adonis]

so you think for natural trainees it is the best method?

i still am working out what works best for me, i mean i've done max-ot for my entire pre contest bulking up phase and i dunno it just felt like it made me stronger?

i guess ill have to give it a shot again.

[Maxima98 GXE]

Originally posted by adonis
so you think for natural trainees it is the best method?

i still am working out what works best for me, i mean i've done max-ot for my entire pre contest bulking up phase and i dunno it just felt like it made me stronger?

i guess ill have to give it a shot again.

I'm saying that disregarding HIT because the pros use something else would not be logical, since they are so heavily drugged.

[Noel]

Originally posted by Maxima98 GXE
I'm saying that disregarding HIT because the pros use something else would not be logical, since they are so heavily drugged.

agrees to that...

Yeah I have a routine similar to the sample one, and it is going pretty good.

Originally posted by adonis
so you think for natural trainees it is the best method?

i still am working out what works best for me, i mean i've done max-ot for my entire pre contest bulking up phase and i dunno it just felt like it made me stronger?

i guess ill have to give it a shot again.

Yeah I had the same results with Max-OT. I felt that it made me a ton stronger but the muscle gains were not what I had hoped for.

this would never work for me

HIT is rubbish IMO

I go to failiure every set, and I still have more energy to push out a couple of heavy sets, every rep you do tears into your muscle, the more volume you do the larger the tears, and the bigger you will get

volume training makes you big, i'm assuming HIT will get your stronger, but i don't care about strength, i'm out to get bigger!

hence why no one i know uses this method of training

i'm trying GVT, and OVT before HIT

peace

Originally posted by Unregistered

I go to failiure every set, and I still have more energy to push out a couple of heavy sets, every rep you do tears into your muscle, the more volume you do the larger the tears, and the bigger you will get

Following that logic you must do about a thousand sets right?

Why stop at a thousand when there's time for a few more sets?

If more is better where do you stop?

Perhaps you should look into the role of the Central nervous system in regard to training.....

[str8flexed]

Originally posted by adonis
so you think for natural trainees it is the best method?

i still am working out what works best for me, i mean i've done max-ot for my entire pre contest bulking up phase and i dunno it just felt like it made me stronger?

i guess ill have to give it a shot again.

no it's not. HIT undertrains the muscular system and overtrains the nervous system. I'm so tired of going over this whole thing though, let me just say the logic behind HIT has very little scientific basis other than "i'm big, so listen to me."

[str8flexed]

Originally posted by Unregistered


I go to failiure every set, and I still have more energy to push out a couple of heavy sets, every rep you do tears into your muscle, the more volume you do the larger the tears, and the bigger you will get


peace

This is also not the most intelligent statement I have ever read

[adonis]

im a fan of volume, always have, always will

so im not even going to bother with hit

[RandyR]

Than stay small and feeble. Your choice!!

[RandyR]

Any way. Great work Sean.

[rent-a-lambo]

Originally posted by str8flexed
no it's not. HIT undertrains the muscular system and overtrains the nervous system. I'm so tired of going over this whole thing though, let me just say the logic behind HIT has very little scientific basis other than "i'm big, so listen to me."

Bump!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[adonis]

doing doggcrapp now
http://www.musclemayhem.com/forum/cg...T;f=10;t=14528

[RandyR]

Thought you were never going to stop using the volume aproach.......

[adonis]

only an idiot has a narrow mind

just like cutler with his 'ill retire with ISS' and now hes with muscletech

lol

Excellent article.Sean i am a great fan of yours and read ur articles.HIT is a definite mass builder. In 1 Yr. i gained more than 19kg of weight with very less fat.I am a hardgainer but now i look huge due to my height 6.1 ft.Well done....
BIG BROTHER.

Keep gaining and write more about hit.

I WILL CONTINUE PREACH HIT and MIKE MENTZER.

[andrew76]

HIT is quite good...but i use more set like 4-6 sets for large muscle and 2-4 sets for small muscle

[ake11]

so are you supposed to do (1) set of whatever you work out but just very heavy weight with HIT? And only once a week? I dont understand