Discussion: Dirty bulk vs rate of growth

[little0z]

I'd be interested to read people's thoughts on this hypothetical scenario:

A 20-25 year old male has been working out for several years. He is currently in a mass gaining phase and wants to keep his gains relatively clean. The majority of his diet consists of what would be considered dirty foods - kfc, hungry jacks, bacon etc in average size meals every few hours. He lifts consistently and heavily several times/week and is getting stronger.

He weighs himself on an empty stomach first thing in the morning every Monday and each week he has gained 0.5 - 1kg (1 - 2lb). Now considering that this is a good rate of growth to aim for (this is another point for discussion), would his gains be as "clean" as someone who was on a clean diet who was gaining the *exact* same amount of weight each week, and lifting the exact same weights? Would he be putting on the same ratio of muscle:fat as the other person?

Btw I'm not describing myself here it's just something I thought of and would like to know people's opinions.

Discuss.

[Trappy]

No. He will be getting in more simple carbs/trans and sat fats and not as decent quality protein. Thus, he may be gaining the same weight as someone clean bulking, but the person doing it clean could be putting on 80% muscle 20% fat and he could be putting on 40% muscle and 60% fat.

[tyler_tg]

you could do it that way but i clean bulk and still have my six pac which i want to keep