I think I'm the only one here.

MEGAMAZ · 07-23-2007, 02:23 AM

Who's priorities line up like this, strength>endurance>looks. Am I right?

That being said, should I be following different routines then what you guys suggest?

Right now my routine looks like this Mon- Chest, Tues- Shoulders, Wed- Legs, Thursday- Back, Friday- Arms. Abs everyday unless I'm still sore from the last day. I'm doing the 10-8-6-4-3-2-2 routine. Which I was told is best for strength. Just looking for other opinions.

mark118 · 07-23-2007, 02:27 AM

Mine is looks 1st, endurance and then strength in last place.

kyokushin1 · 07-23-2007, 02:36 AM

Usually people who train for strength are either powerlifters or fat, and 'strength' is their excuse because they can't be bothered cutting. lol jks :P kinda...not saying your fat lol!

Anywho, my priorites: looks > strength > endurance

MEGAMAZ · 07-23-2007, 02:39 AM

Hahaha, I'm not fat, at least really fat. A little flabby but oh well. I just like being skinny, I don't want to be all huge and then I have to struggle to lift a pencil off the desk. hahahaha

kyokushin1 · 07-23-2007, 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MEGAMAZ

Hahaha, I'm not fat, at least really fat. A little flabby but oh well. I just like being skinny, I don't want to be all huge and then I have to struggle to lift a pencil off the desk. hahahaha

There is a direct correlation between muscle size and muscle strength, at least ive heard. My point is, you can't get huge without getting strong. Have a look at bodybuilders. There main goal is looks/aesthetics, but they are ****ing strong mofo's.