Words From Red Square

[BlueBayou]

Things are more serious and dangerous than most Americans realize...

http://www.financialsense.com/stormw.../analysis.html

WORDS FROM RED SQUARE
by J. R. Nyquist


“The dialectic of this offensive consists of a calculated shift from the old, discredited Soviet practice to a new, ‘liberalized’ model, with a social democratic fa?ade, to realize the communist planners’ strategy for establishing a united Europe. At the beginning they introduced a variation of the 1968 Czechoslovakian ‘democratization.’ At a later phase they will shift to a variation of the Czechoslovakian takeover of 1948.”

- Anatoliy Golitsyn, KGB defector



It was an impressive, solemn occasion in front of Lenin’s Mausoleum on Wednesday. It was the anniversary of Soviet Russia’s victory over Nazi Germany. There was military discipline, pomp and ceremony in Red Square. Russian soldiers goose-stepped and saluted. Old heroes displayed their medals. Jet fighters soared overhead. President Vladimir Putin addressed the assembled generals and admirals as “comrades,” according to the Soviet style. You could see the pride in the old face of Russia, in the old national anthem with its new words. “We have no right,” said Putin, “to forget the causes of any war, which are found in the mistakes of peacetime.” Russia’s mistake was to make a strategic partner out of Hitler, whose policies threatened the entire world.

“In our time,” said Putin, “these threats are not diminishing. They have merely undergone a transformation, changing their appearance. We find in these new threats – as during the time of the Third Reich – the same contempt for human life and the same claims of exceptionality.” In saying this, President Putin was talking about the United States. Putin was saying that fascism now flies the American flag. He was saying that the U.S. military is like the Nazi war machine, threatening the entire world.

The Russian people are being oriented to a new enemy. They are being told to fear and hate the Americans. According to Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin, the Russian Desk of British intelligence has warned that Putin may be preparing a new Cold War against America. But this is old news. Those who have been paying attention need no secret intelligence to see what is coming – what has already arrived. The whole period of perestroika and the collapse of communism and the “democracy” of Boris Yeltsin was nothing more than a preparatory interval. And now the preparations are nearing their completion. Russia has begun using its economic weapon – energy. The Europeans pretend that they are independent of Russia, but in reality the game is up. All that is required, in the long run, is the right propaganda. And Putin has discovered this propaganda. By mischaracterizing America’s military plans, Russia plays the injured innocent. By likening Bush to Hitler, and America to the Third Reich, Putin seizes the moral high ground – rallying the international Left to Russia, impressing the dictators of the Third World with his anti-American credentials. At the same time, he sends a warning message to Europe. The world is against America, and you’d better join us.

Since 1991 the U.S. Government has stupidly believed in Russia’s transformation, in Russian democracy, in Russian disarmament, in Russian good intentions. There is no American threat to Russia. The Americans are tied up in Iraq and Afghanistan, and everyone knows the Americans are losing. The American side doesn’t want to be enemies with Russia. The Americans don’t see any reason for conflict with Russia. At the same time, NATO is divided, weak, distracted and unready for war. As reported by the New York Times, America’s leaders are busy debating the collapse of deterrence. Experts from the Pentagon, CIA, FBI and Energy Department are wondering who to retaliate against if terrorists set off a nuclear bomb in an American city.

If missiles were launched against America from silos in Russia the Americans would know who to retaliate against. But if terrorists detonate atomic weapons in New York and Washington, they couldn’t retaliate against anyone, even if the bomb-grade uranium or plutonium was traceable to Russia or China or Pakistan. It was suggested, one year ago, that the United States issue a warning to the other nuclear powers: “We will hold you fully responsible if your bomb-grade material is used to destroy an American city.” Although a warning was issued to North Korea, no warnings have been issued to Russia, China or Pakistan.

And yes, Russia’s arsenal is believed to be the most likely source for a terrorist weapon. And the Kremlin is stating, for all to hear, that America has aggressive designs and destructive plans aimed at Russia. At the same time, behind closed doors, the Americans are reassuring themselves that the destruction of New York and Washington cannot be blamed on Russia because any such destruction, even if traced to Russian nuclear stockpiles, would be “inadvertent.”

The determination has already been made. Russia is judged innocent in advance, and the Kremlin knows that the way is open; the American strategists have declared their faith, their belief in Russia as a strategic partner. Vladimir Putin can say whatever he likes. He can threaten a new Cold War. He can initiate an arms race. The American strategists will not suspect him of evil intentions. When New York is burning and fallout is killing everyone in Connecticut, the leadership of the United States will not suspect Putin of treachery. After all, a strategic partner is a strategic partner.

Here is the fateful method of launching a nuclear war without fear of retaliation. Note the precondition: false flag terrorism (i.e., gray terror). Note the psychological preparations: Russian nuclear facilities aren’t terribly secure (i.e., Gen. Lebed’s claim, years ago, that Russian warheads were “missing”). Note America’s credulity: (1) Russia is no longer our enemy; (2) Islam is the main threat to America’s survival; (3) the alliance between Russia and China is not aimed at America; (4) America is the lone superpower.

The words from Red Square give the game away.


2007 Jeffrey R. Nyquist

[BlueBayou]

In other news:


Russian High Energy EM Pulse Breakthrough

MOSCOW. (Yury Zaitsev for RIA Novosti) - A group of Russian scientists from Tomsk, Yekaterinburg, Nizhny Novgorod and Moscow have developed a series of unique compact generators capable of producing high-energy pulses of hundreds and even thousands of megawatts.

This compares with the capacity of a major Soviet hydropower station on the Dnieper or an energy unit at a modern nuclear power plant. The new generators are sources of electromagnetic radiation rather than electricity. Their main feature is a capacity to produce enormous power in a matter of nanoseconds. The impulses can be generated with a very high frequency.

Vice President of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) Gennady Mesyats recalled that the first high-current electron accelerators were developed in the U.S.S.R. in the 1960s. Ten years later, Soviet scientists learnt to generate powerful microwave nanosecond pulses. The current generators have no counterparts in the world. In effect, Russian scientists have made a breakthrough in what is called relativist high-precision electronics.

The pulse is primarily of interest for fundamental research. Reporting these results to the RAS Presidium at the beginning of this year, scientists emphasized that sources with super radiation effects can be broadly used in long-range high-resolution impulse-based radiolocation and in studies of non-thermal impact of powerful electromagnetic fields on radio electronic components and different biological species.

Super-powerful pulse generators can test the reliability of radio electronic devices and the immunity of energy facilities to different impacts. They can imitate the interference caused by a lightning and even by a nuclear blast. Their tiny size and unique physical properties make their sphere of application extremely wide.

The electromagnetic pulse (EMP) is a product of a nuclear explosion. It puts out of action even those electronic control systems that have withstood the shockwave and reduces expensive smart weapons to scrap metal. There are different ways of generating electromagnetic pulses - for example, it can be produced by explosion-induced pressure on a magnetic field.

Physicist Andrei Sakharov was the first to propose using this principle in a bomb in the 1950s. Today, records in the size of an induced magnetic field, maximum current and properties of such "radiators" belong to Russian scientists. They surpass foreign counterparts by 10 times. Depending on what facilities the EMP is directed at, the damage radius can be from several hundred meters to kilometers. Without creating a shock wave and inflicting visible damage, it destroys all enemy electronic equipment. Moreover, unlike electronic countermeasures, electromagnetic weapons are capable of damaging radio electronic components even if they are switched off.

At present, the infrastructure and troops of many countries are stuffed with electronic equipment. It will be the main target for electromagnetic weapons. The destructive effect is produced by the high acceleration of the magnetic and electrical components of the EMP. They induce voltage changes ranging from 100 volts to 10,000 volts in circuit networks and terminals of radio electronic equipment. The ensuing massive sparking of cable jackets, their contact to frame and the ground, and breakdowns in connectors put the equipment out of action and lead to fires and explosions. To understand this effect better, it is enough to imagine what will happen to your TV-set if there is a power surge - it will simply melt.

The Americans were the first to use such weapons in combat, for instance in Yugoslavia. Some analysts believe that electromagnetic bombs would have given the United States a vital advantage in the early stages of the war in Iraq. They could have disabled not only Baghdad's control and communications systems, but also electronic components of missiles, even those located in deep bunkers. But the U.S. command chose not to use electromagnetic bombs for fear that they might disrupt its own radio electronic equipment in the area.

Today, many countries have electromagnetic weapons. Military experts predict a victory in future wars to those who will be ahead in electromagnetic radiation. In many cases, not only the military-industrial complexes but also different civilian organizations, research institutes and universities conduct studies in this field, thereby increasing the threat of radio electronic terrorism. For example, a broadband high-energy and compact wave source is sold without any restrictions. In several fractions of a second, it can burn down all electronic equipment at an electric power station, substation or control tower.

A short intensive pulse can instantly paralyze data bases, financial centers and industrial equipment.

Yuri Zaitsev is an academic adviser at the Academy of Engineering Sciences.

http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20070511/65348455.html

[BlueBayou]

You havent heard much about this in your national mainstream news/media have you?
No, other than -
"Putin called America the Third Reich and fascist, and called Bush Hitler."
"Is he crazy? Look why he is wrong...blah blah"

What has caused this position to be taken by Russia? Threats to it. The Empirialistic Globalist greed coming out of DC is threatening Russia.

And then there is the exposing and realization of the One World Government aspirations and actions of a cultic group of elitists conspired mostly in secret, that has been created by the virus that now infects Washington, DC, but has been exposed enough for us to understand the basics of it.

We must transform America back into a benevolent, great, worldly country.
We must stop this empire before it kills us.

[Captain Harris]

Originally Posted by BlueBayou

You havent heard much about this in your national mainstream news/media have you?
No, other than -
"Putin called America the Third Reich and fascist, and called Bush Hitler."
"Is he crazy? Look why he is wrong...blah blah"

What has caused this position to be taken by Russia? Threats to it. The Empirialistic Globalist greed coming out of DC is threatening Russia.

Russia doesn't have to take this position. American teenagers are already taking it in droves. It must be quite heartening when a soldier comes home from the sandbox and hears punk kids calling him a Nazi. America has alot of cleaning up to do inside its borders before it even thinks about dealing with Russia.

[TDetroit]

As if anyone thought Russia had any other plans. China too. They are the true threat. Let them come to Detroit, even the goalies fight!

[concept]

Interesting article Bayou. What do you think about the issue?

[xer0xed]

Russia and China have always historically been enemies, I thought

[BlueBayou]

Originally Posted by xer0xed

Russia and China have always historically been enemies, I thought

Not anymore:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shangha...n_Organization

The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) is an intergovernmental organization which was founded on June 14, 2001 by the leaders of the People's Republic of China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Except for Uzbekistan, the other countries had been members of the Shanghai Five; after the inclusion of Uzbekistan in 2001, the members renamed the organization. Though not a military alliance['officially' anyway; however, we know that there has been intensive military cooperation, mostly covert and uncovered - but also overt military cooperation, between Russia and China in recent years], many look to this organization as a counter to the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO).

...

Though the declaration on the establishment of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation contained a statement that it "is not an alliance directed against other states and regions and it adheres to the principle of openness", many observers believe that one of the original purposes of the SCO was to serve as a counterbalance to NATO and the United States and in particular to avoid conflicts that would allow the United States to intervene in areas near both Russia and China. Some observers also believe that the organization was formed as a direct response to the threat of missile defense systems[Note the recent news about this subject/conflict with missile emplacements in eastern Europe and other.] by the United States, after the United States reversed course in its nuclear policy and began promoting National Missile Defense.

The United States has applied for observer status to SCO and was rejected.

The SCO was formed 3 months before 9/11. As to whether or not the two events have any significance or correlation to each other, I believe the answer is yes.