Real Women Have CURVES~

[CR Racer]

Originally Posted by ceno

The woman in question here is NOT a fitness model who packs 50lb muscle...
its all fat fat fat fat.....

5'5 175lb is borderline OBESE....dont BS yourself....

**** man ever post of yours i find myself saying "yes, this guy is right"


i get a kick out of poeple that say "i like a women with some meat on her" if a 5'5" girl without much muscle weighs 175 its not meat your grabbing, lol.

[-Aaron-]

Any post below mine is getting negged.

[johnsbod]

Originally Posted by -Aaron-

Any post below mine is getting negged.

go for it

[-Aaron-]

Originally Posted by johnsbod

go for it

Yes, sir!

Negged and expecting a neg back.

[Hotmoltenlava]

Originally Posted by -Aaron-

Any post below mine is getting negged.

Originally Posted by -Aaron-

Yes, sir!

Negged and expecting a neg back.

Same here....negged in advance...

[-Aaron-]

Originally Posted by Hotmoltenlava

Same here....negged in advance...

Holy ****, you actually negged me.

[Mook1e]

Originally Posted by lgc21x

When I said that, I meant at 165 lbs..it can be changed as I have first hand seen many have. Its not obese, unless 160 lbs of that is body fat(exaggerating, but you get my point), and its distorted and wrong for people to think and call a girl that weighs 165 lbs obese like many have in this thread. In that case, Tyra Banks is freaking obese now. Granted she is a bit taller - celebrity magazines just had to put her down from cover to cover. And she spoke out, has a world wide campaign, So What! .. empowering women to feel better about themselves. My whole point in this useless thread that I probably shouldn't of wasted my time on is that a girl with excess fat around 160-170 lbs at 5'5 is not obese. She may need work, she may be overweight or she may love herself (as OP's girlfriend does) just the way she is.

For the love of GOD. The scientific definition of obese for a female is 30% bf and above. Ole' girl is above. It's great to be compassionate and great to love yourself, but let's be real here.

I can't believe you're gonna neg me and you had no problem bumping that 15 kid's thread!

[DatDereCe11Tech]

Originally Posted by Aftershock9958

Tits and ass do not account for 165 pounds. You like fat girls.

x2

tits and ass and hips should exist at around 110-140 Pounds

[_Spiral]

Originally Posted by Aftershock9958

Reading comprehension ftw.



Not quite sure I see rib cages or hip bones in either girl:




Please, by all means correct me if I'm wrong.

That's because they don't have hips....they have tits...usually fake..other than that they're straight up and down. Legs are probably hard...most guys like their thighs to be soft. I need something to grab, sorry. I can see you guys point about the 175 thing though. Most women can't hold that much and look good, unless they're black, spanish, italian or somethin they look dumply? Also, LOL at the 130 and under. A lot of you guys don't even realize how much some of these girls weigh even when they're in good shape. 130, ok...

[_Spiral]

Originally Posted by Bad Company

148lb tough guy who thinks he is snoop d o double g.

Seriously, u need to stop talking here and go to the misc.

How can calling u a wigga be racist? Its a goofy way of dressing and acting like a fukcing moron, not a race...

Why worry about what he's wearing? Are you his man? His words were arranged in an intelligent manner, he wasn't on here saying "ya know what i'm sayin....word". Who cares? Maybe he grew up around others that dress like that and that's what he likes. You don't have to buy his clothes and he seems to carry himself better than a lot of you on this board so why even bring it up?

[_Spiral]

Originally Posted by Bad Company

148lb tough guy who thinks he is snoop d o double g.

Seriously, u need to stop talking here and go to the misc.

How can calling u a wigga be racist? Its a goofy way of dressing and acting like a fukcing moron, not a race...

Oh...and 204 at 6'2 "ain't worth d*ck" in my book. You look like one of the dudes that stares when I start moving weight in the gym.

[_Spiral]

Originally Posted by Aftershock9958

Here's the thing about this entire thread. Everyone, everyone who's defending this guy is all like "Yeah thick girls! I like curves! My curves are great!" And then we get hit with a 120 pound example, or a 138 pound example, or whatever the case may be.

My friends, 138 pounds is a far cry from 175 pounds, curves or no. A big booty at 138 is not the same as a fat ass at 175 pounds by any means. That is the point here. He likes 175 pound at 5'5. He likes fat girls. He's not saying he likes big-bootied 138 pound girls, or Vida Guerra's 125 pounds, or Jessica Rabbit at 123. I like curves. I love curvy girls. But when you're 5'5 165, you're not curvy. You're fat.

ehh and Vida Guerra is not 125lbs. I don't care if she's 4'11. That girls not 125, you can read the magazine stats all you want. They also make a lot of the singers and actors out there seem taller than they are. I think we need a scale in here...

[Aftershock9958]

Jelena is far from straight up and down. Jamie doesn't have a lot of hips, but for the love of god look at that ass. How does someone with so little body fat have an ass like that? She's blessed.

I was estimating on Vida, but I assure you she's not 175.

[Hotmoltenlava]

Originally Posted by -Aaron-

Holy ****, you actually negged me.

Feels good to get negged from time to time......

Have a good one.

[Bronkko]

Originally Posted by _Spiral

ehh and Vida Guerra is not 125lbs. I don't care if she's 4'11. That girls not 125, you can read the magazine stats all you want. They also make a lot of the singers and actors out there seem taller than they are. I think we need a scale in here...

vida has a fat ass. not a nice ass. ok. its kinda nice...but WAY OVERRATED.

[Bronkko]

Originally Posted by Bronkko

vida has a fat ass. not a nice ass. ok. its kinda nice...but WAY OVERRATED.

ok, ill admit that it looks great here.. but have seen some pics lately where that thing has grown out of control.

[shellyrene]

I have to admit~~it was soo nice to see your post~~I am 165 at only 5' 1" and I feel like I dont look absolutely disgusting~~even though Im on my way to losing 35 more pounds I really believe that not everyone has to fit into the same cookie cutter mold and beauty comes in all shapes and sizes!!!THANKS again

[c0ldhart]

I agree with whomever mentioned that some very fit women weigh alot more than most people realize....

ie. I'm about 143lbs.. and I'm 5ft 4 in and a size 4...so if you put a woman standing next to me with the same size and measurements... she'll weigh on a average of about 20-30 lbs less than me... so who's to say what the OP's GF really looks like... i've weighed 162 lbs before and been a large 6... nobody would EVER guess that I weigh that much, i'm just really solid... I'm not even saying that I'm very fit now, I still think my BF% is way too high for what my goals are... but i know that I will NEVER weigh under 130lbs and not be sick and sickly and a size 0 or something else crazy...

But to the OP, throw the scale away and when your GF feels that she looks good and is in good shape, let that determine what weight she needs to be at...the scale is BS anyway.

[_Spiral]

Originally Posted by Aftershock9958

Jelena is far from straight up and down. Jamie doesn't have a lot of hips, but for the love of god look at that ass. How does someone with so little body fat have an ass like that? She's blessed.

I was estimating on Vida, but I assure you she's not 175.

I'm confused? I don't see anything special about her butt. I see that every day of the week...even on white women(no offense to any of the women that happen to read this) in the gym. Any girl that does her squats has MORE than that. Even with low bodyfat. I encourage you go visit a local college womens soccer game. *thumbs up*

[_Spiral]

Originally Posted by Bronkko

ok, ill admit that it looks great here.. but have seen some pics lately where that thing has grown out of control.

depends. some guys want "a nice little cute" but that they can grab. Fits in their palm...some of us like to be smothered with it...and i'm not talking about just all out being fat or whatever but yeah. If it doesn't move at all when walking i'm not that impressed.

[_Spiral]

Here's one that's pretty much lean and beats the fitness model...and she's a normal girl that a perverted associate of mine picked up for his photography hobby. THIS one doesn't hasn't been touched up either. That's another thing I hate...i really don't like looking at chicks in the magazines, they go through all of this photoshop work to make their skin look a certain texture/complexion. A lot of them when you look at their waists they're stretched to give them this elongated look. I don't know, I prefer real women (that aren't related to stretch armstrong). Women usually just aren't built that way...and I can't bring myself to like it.

[zachatta]

Bottom line is, you like your girl for who she is man.

In the Medieval ages people liked women who were bigger in proportion, why because they were considered to have wealth.

Sadly its the same trend of today, at lot of people subconsciously decide that thin women have time/money to maintain they body figure.

basically, its a society thing, either way, if you like your girl big man, more power to ya brother.

[_Spiral]

Originally Posted by zachatta

Bottom line is, you like your girl for who she is man.

In the Medieval ages people liked women who were bigger in proportion, why because they were considered to have wealth.

Sadly its the same trend of today, at lot of people subconsciously decide that thin women have time/money to maintain they body figure.

basically, its a society thing, either way, if you like your girl big man, more power to ya brother.

Very well put...and true. I like em all...skinny to meh slightly plump. Just don't have any nooks/crannies....before i've known you 10 years. *sigh*

[Aftershock9958]

Girls who do lots of squatting and have low bf don't have asses like that. Muscular asses don't look that way.

And your attached girl doesn't strike me as "pretty much lean". She's a couple hostess snack cakes away from being chunky, and her ass is massive (and not in a good way).

[zachatta]

Originally Posted by _Spiral

Here's one that's pretty much lean and beats the fitness model...and she's a normal girl that a perverted associate of mine picked up for his photography hobby. THIS one doesn't hasn't been touched up either. That's another thing I hate...i really don't like looking at chicks in the magazines, they go through all of this photoshop work to make their skin look a certain texture/complexion. A lot of them when you look at their waists they're stretched to give them this elongated look. I don't know, I prefer real women (that aren't related to stretch armstrong). Women usually just aren't built that way...and I can't bring myself to like it.

Thats a mean ass id like to get into. Im with spiral on this one.

As far as being "fat" i dunno about all that.

[Bronkko]

Originally Posted by zachatta

Thats a mean ass id like to get into. Im with spiral on this one.

As far as being "fat" i dunno about all that.

shes not fat but that ass is disproportionate from her body. too big for me.

i'd say the ass size preference is "generally" culture driven.

fwiw, cavemen preferred large asses. there was an article recently that tracked cave drawings that the men from our primitive beginnings preferred bigger asses. probably better child bearing percentage.

[rusrious]

Originally Posted by _Spiral

depends. some guys want "a nice little cute" but that they can grab. Fits in their palm...some of us like to be smothered with it...and i'm not talking about just all out being fat or whatever but yeah. If it doesn't move at all when walking i'm not that impressed.

Thats a nice ass there,

[Ancient Olympia]

It is a cultural thing to some degree. I prefer girls who are in the 110-120 lbs range and between 5'2-5'5. Its more fun to move them around. Big beefy thighs around the neck is pretty gross