 |
07-09-2007, 05:46 PM
|
#1
|
|
Get huge or die tryin'
Join Date: Nov 2006
Age: 19
Stats: 5'11", 170 lbs
Posts: 1,411
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 8287
|
How accurate is this 1rm calculator? (serious)
http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/1rm.htm
just wondering how yours compares to it.. i don't want to waste a workout today on finding my 1rm so i'm just curious how yours all compare.
__________________
Start: 5'11" 145 (Nov 2006)
Now: 5'11" 170 (dehydrated/carb depleted ~164)
Bench: 200x6
Squat: 225x10
Dead: 255x8
"The vision of a champion is someone bent over, drenched in sweat, to a point of exhaustion, when no one else is watching."
|
|
|
07-09-2007, 05:53 PM
|
#2
|
|
Bodhisattva
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Minnesota, United States
Age: 31
Stats: 6'2", 204 lbs
Posts: 1,165
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 2607
|
Seems close.
__________________
Only after you have lost everything, Are you free to do anything.
|
|
|
07-09-2007, 06:22 PM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 98
|
I usually use 10% on a triple, eg 300x3 should be good for about 330 max single. I find that 1RM calculator to be off by 1 rep. I just googled and checked a bunch of 1 RM calculators and I entered 300x3 and got either 318 or 327.
Best thing to do is keep track of your #'s and when you max, use your max triple to determine you own percentages.
|
|
|
07-09-2007, 06:45 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Age: 39
Posts: 1,118
|
It is a complete joke...everyone is very different..If you train with all low reps for power you burn out faster...example is a guy I know can rep 225lbs the same as me, but my max is 70lbs more then his...he trains with high reps.
__________________
"Freedom isn't free" How quickly we forget.
|
|
|
07-09-2007, 09:38 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Age: 28
Posts: 4,671
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 17184
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LockOut
It is a complete joke...everyone is very different..If you train with all low reps for power you burn out faster...example is a guy I know can rep 225lbs the same as me, but my max is 70lbs more then his...he trains with high reps.
|
Exactly...those do not work for everyone. On ME Exercises, I don't go above 3 reps, those things will never be able to determine my 1 rep max.
__________________
www.myspace.com/nemmaacademy (old gym)
Applied Nutriceuticals Rep
www.appliednutriceuticals.com
'Better Results Through Science'
http://www.bodybuilding.com/store/app/app.htm
JMIL's New ISA TEST Log - http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=115080081
http://www.myspace.com/49194521
|
|
|
07-09-2007, 10:15 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Age: 42
Stats: 204 lbs
Posts: 13,774
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 23302
|
obviously the less reps u use the closer it is. In other words if u enter a 10 rep numbers its a total crapshoot. a 5 rep number is closer, a 3 rep is even closer
I maxed 315 on bench the other day. I missed 325
2 weeks before I did 275x5..for 275x5 it says 309
I did 295x3 and that comes to 312
so for me it comes up only SLIGHTLY conservative
__________________
"the red light...somebody's got to pay"
|
|
|
07-10-2007, 12:12 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Age: 20
Stats: 6'0", 219 lbs
Posts: 421
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 3473
|
Best thing to do is just get your own percentages for future references.
|
|
|
07-10-2007, 02:28 AM
|
#8
|
|
Unstoppable
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Stats: 5'6", 178 lbs
Posts: 220
BodyPoints: 9461
|
The day I consider a one rep max test a wasted workout is the day I put a bullet in my brain.
__________________
Life's too short to do bodypart splits.
NEW PR: 440 FRONT SQUAT!!!
|
|
|
07-10-2007, 04:29 AM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: United States
Stats: 5'7", 195 lbs
Posts: 4,779
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 20318
|
I put in 100 pounds for 1 rep and it calculated 100 pounds for my one rep max, therefore it works. /thread
__________________
Powerlifting Journal
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?p=56572381&posted=1#post56572381
Bench 45 pounds 2 reps off of 6 boards (5 ply phenom interwoven with denom)
Deadlift 85 pounds 4 reps off knee high rack pins
Squat 95 pounds 6 reps box squats 16 inches above parallel (3 ply canvas suit)
BW 120
HT 5'8"
Arms 8 1/4
Chest 27
Legs 16
Waist 48
|
|
|
07-10-2007, 05:15 AM
|
#10
|
|
275's here I come
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Stats: 5'11", 253 lbs
Posts: 2,982
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 13594
|
^ Lol
How accurate? Not very.
Besides, everyone's different.
|
|
|
07-10-2007, 11:52 AM
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Age: 21
Posts: 34
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 976
|
iam really against these 1rm calculators....who needs them, and who cares if they are accurate....u can determine ur 1rm just by trying to max out at the end of ur bench routine, all u need to do is know ur body and know wat weight u can handle.....
__________________
APPROX. BWT- 110lbs
MAX BENCH- 235lbs/220lbs raw
MAX SQUAT- 365lbs raw
MAX DEADLIFT- 275lbs raw
-1st place in all 7 competitions
-Best lifter award for IPA nationals Nov. 2005
-set 3 records for the 114lb wt. class in the teen div. for the IPA on Nov. 2005/2006
|
|
|
07-10-2007, 12:00 PM
|
#12
|
|
Podefile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Capitalizing RAW and burning wrist wraps 100% DRUG FREE
Age: 19
Stats: 6'2", 259 lbs
Posts: 16,304
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 31191
|
it depends, if you benched 275x5 hard as fck it would tell you like 315, but if you did it some what easier it would tell you the same thing, it doesn't know how hard your worked on your set, and it doesn't know how you usually train for what rep range your best at, so it can't be 100% accurate.
|
|
|
07-10-2007, 01:11 PM
|
#13
|
|
repper bakker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Posts: 1,531
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 11439
|
it works for me on most lifts.
__________________
i am the rappar bakkar-
rappar bakkar-{n}a person who receives raps+,that
gives raps+ back.100%. IHATEFALSEADVERTISERS
i owe raps to-
sonicology<for life-
|
|
|
07-10-2007, 02:04 PM
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Palatine, Illinois, United States
Age: 26
Stats: 5'6", 208 lbs
Posts: 56
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 7935
|
to find your 1rm max, do as much heavy weight as you can for 1 rep
There's your 1rm calculator. The only accurate one.
|
|
|
07-10-2007, 03:11 PM
|
#15
|
|
U mad?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Illinois, United States
Stats: 5'10", 300 lbs
Posts: 8,153
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 18446
|
Not very.
You can NEVER get a 1rm from a rep max.
Even tho idiots on this site think that you can.
__________________
United States Air Force DEP - BMT 10 Aug 09
"Hitler built a fortress around Europe, but he forgot to put a roof on it."
Military PT Log
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=109105731
Mizzou Football: 8/30, Home v. Illinois
Tarheel Basketball: N/A
|
|
|
07-10-2007, 03:19 PM
|
#16
|
|
Podefile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Capitalizing RAW and burning wrist wraps 100% DRUG FREE
Age: 19
Stats: 6'2", 259 lbs
Posts: 16,304
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 31191
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MidwestMonster
Not very.
You can NEVER get a 1rm from a rep max.
Even tho idiots on this site think that you can.
|
wow strong bench to dl ratio
|
|
|
07-10-2007, 09:46 PM
|
#17
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Age: 22
Posts: 198
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 2316
|
there seems to be a huge hating going and i hate to get involved, but sometimes i do succumb to the guilty pleasure that is the theoretical 1rm calcs. i find as long as you plus in your absolute rep maxes theyre never that far off. Take them with a grain of salt, but they are fun to see say, what your max could be at the end of some training program like smolov or w.e.
heres the one i find the most useful, bc it has dif. coefficients for dif. lifts
http://www.muscletech.com/CALCULATOR..._rep_max.shtml
anyways enjoy
__________________
550/345TNG/605 - gym PRs
506/308/606/1420 - meet PRs
|
|
|
07-10-2007, 10:24 PM
|
#18
|
|
challenge me, i dare you
Join Date: Mar 2006
Stats: 6'0", 156 lbs
Posts: 210
BodyPoints: 1041
|
it was pretty close on my weights...not perfect but close
__________________
hello
|
|
|
07-11-2007, 03:48 PM
|
#19
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 21
Stats: 6'1", 195 lbs
Posts: 831
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 9621
|
Bb.com 1rm calc. I entered 220 for 8 reps on squat, it says 275 is my 1rm
calc. on the link this posted in this thread says 292 for the same weight/reps?
wtf?
__________________
True observation begins when one is devoid of set patterns
Silverback #1
Love
It can move one's heart to see a young couple romantically enthralled with each other. But the heart becomes deeply sad just a few months later - to see their paralyzing dependence on one another.
The more intense has been the religion of any period and the more profound has been the dogmatic belief, the greater has been the cruelty and the worse has been the state of affairs
|
|
|
07-11-2007, 05:31 PM
|
#20
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Age: 20
Stats: 5'7", 156 lbs
Posts: 1,410
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 16314
|
that calc is crap........ the only 1rm calculator that in my opinion is actually very very accurate is the one on criticalbench.com
__________________
Powerlifting
ATG S - 370 - 335 x 4
Bench- 280 - 255 x 3
Deadlift-460 - 402 x 6
Total - 1110
Olympic lifting
front squat - 257
Clean - 242
squat + Behind the neck jerk - 222
C + J - 210
|
|
|
07-11-2007, 10:20 PM
|
#21
|
|
I <3 Tranny Feet
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,240
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 1946
|
it all depends on the person, style, and technique of benching and doing reps. also the higher the reps, obviously the lower the accuracy. honestly if you want to find out just max, don't assume.
__________________
The Percepta @ 165ah
|
|
|
07-12-2007, 02:09 AM
|
#22
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Age: 56
Stats: 5'9", 210 lbs
Posts: 3,567
BodyBlog Entries: 0
BodyPoints: 15762
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perceptionist
it all depends on the person, style, and technique of benching and doing reps. also the higher the reps, obviously the lower the accuracy. honestly if you want to find out just max, don't assume.
|
Spot on, Perceptionist.
People are far to anal about this kind of thing......kind of like the guy who tells you in all seriousness that his bodyfat is 13.4% when we all know that the error is +/- 3%, and increases the leaner you get.
A very simplified chart looks like this:
1 rep 100%
2 reps 95
4.......90
6.......85
8.......80
10.....75
12.....70
and then
15.....65
20.....60
This is really easy to remember. For every next even rep in the range most people are interested just take off 5%
All very neat......but THIS IS UTTER NONSENSE. It sure sells books and articles, though.
The following chart is fairly accurrate for most lifts, most people:
1rep......100%
2...........95
3...........90
And that's it! The error could be up to 1-2% but the working figures are a useful guide.
After that, accuracy falls off a cliff. Many do high reps(in my book, anything over 5) but never go low. They really have no idea what their 1rm is.
The reverse is also true. When I went from my favourite 5x5(ramping the weight) to 8reps once, I had to drop the weight in almost every exercise by a whopping 25-30%! Not the 7.5% the typical chart solemnly "informs" us.
I was just so totally unconditioned for the higher rep range.
Currently I add a backdown set or two of higher reps, up to 10. I want to add size as well as endurance. My high rep strength has gone way up......with hardly any effect at all on my low rep strength.
To MY chart i can add
4.....85
5 or 6 ...80%.......or thereabouts.......sorta.
10........no idea, it is still increasing!
Bottom line, your workout journal tells you that a particular 100kg lift for 5 reps in good form is worth a 120kg single. For YOU the 20% or 1.2x factor is accurate.........but only for that or similar lift.
Put no faith in all the scientific mumbo jumbo(I have a science background).
Your journal, and iron on the bar, never lies.
Best of luck, all you guys into strength and power.
Last edited by jgreystoke; 07-12-2007 at 05:40 AM.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Member Login
Sign in for more FREE features and tools!
|
|