Search:

IIFIYM claims (as or their followers) nutrient timing is not important and different meal frequencies won't have any different effects on body composition. I'm not using extreme arguments at all....

LOL. I don't have a problem with that. I have a problem with the IFFIYM claim that macronutrient intake is the ONLY thing that matters for body composition. This is not supported by the scientific...

If you really want to shut me up, refer me to some studies showing the IFFIYM claims are true.

If you can't do that, it merely demonstrates my points.

Yawn.



I made this topic because I believe the IFFIYM dogma is nothing better than old dogmas. It's not evidence based, but it claims to be. Whenever I see false dogmas, I try to correct them....

Another check the logs bro argument. Maybe you should browse some other forums because most of the jacked up guys say nutrient timing/frequency DOES matter. Either way, I don't give a **** about...

Do you ever read your references?



I totally agree with that conclusion and that's EXACTLY why IFFIYM is a false dogma. It has NEVER been demonstrated meal frequency/timing doesn't matter AT...

Sorry bro, that is not relevant evidence AT ALL.

Still curious how I'm creating a straw man........

I directly quoted the sticky???

IIFIYM claims nutrient timing is not important and irrelevant for body composition. Please show me some relevant scientific references for that statement. Thanks, bye.

You may be aware I'm posting from a proxy. So not all usernames are mine. Either way, please explain where I'm using a straw man?

That's what I mean with false extrapolations and ASSumptions. Exactly how many of those studies were on resistance athletes training 5 times a week? *silence*

I simply do not know:



It may be beneficial to 'sandwich' your training with sufficient protein, but the evidence for that is far from conclusive either. My take home message is that nobody...

Fallacies you're committing:

1. appeal to reverse authority (I'm red and create stupid threads so my arguments are invalid)
2. appeal to anecdote (I'm the postergirl because IIFIYM works for me)...

Wow. A wild 'check the logs bro' argument appears. You're exactly the same as the 8-meal-a-day bros.

Nice ad hominems. And of course you don't want to discuss this matter. It demonstrates your religion is not evidence based, so you'll try to walk away from the truth.

Another classic case of someone not being capable to participate in a scientific discussion.

Either way, you're claiming I'm wrong when I say IIFIYM is stating nutrient timing is not necessary and...

Not in this topic. I'd like to keep the discussion on track.

Timing your nutrients is not necessary.
^^^^
Show me the scientific literature supporting that ABSOLUTE statement.

Btw, you're on of these extremist. You say people don't need a shake/protein...

I'm not talking about the health aspect. That's a whole other can of worms..

You guys are getting way too extreme. Instead of keeping an agnostic mindset, you're claiming total macronutrient intake is the ONLY thing that matters for body composition.

This is simply not...