Search:

Name one person who has died because of the exhaust from my car and I will gladly stop driving it.

I'm getting bored with this. It appears that what I have said here is simply over your head Skwidward. If you want to understand my position you can review my posts.
I don't expect much from this...

No, I say again facts are not perception. You are commiting the fallacy of equivocation.


No, I have explained three times all ready that this is not the case.


No, Nic's argument does not...

I understand your point but it is important that you recognise that you are using two different definitions of fact. You are appealing to the term on a metaphysical level, and on an epistemic level....

How is it that you cannot see that the facts did not change? You responded very quickly to my last post. Take time to think over my previous posts as I have answered this line of reasoning...

I'd like to request that all of you stick as close to the topic as you are able, if you want me to respond to all three of you the further you spread your arguments out the harder it becomes for me....

Reality is objective; facts do not change based on perception, perception changes based on facts.


How can you argue that they do? Let me ask you this; it was once believed that the earth was...

Religion is the worst moral compas available because it must be accepted on faith.

Reason allows you to determine the right course of action, faith dictates a course of action be it wrong or...

Neither the positive nor the negative definitions must change due to increasing knowledge, what changes is the volume of what we can identify. You do not need to know everything in order of knowing...

How does my argument negate the supernatural from the beginning? I do remember our debate a couple of months ago, you made the exact same accusation then. I do not know where I have done what you are...

I have been spectating this discussion. Your perception of the atheistic argument is now incorrect, although it need not be called the atheistic argument because there is nothing atheistic about it,...

This is the extension of what I was saying. The basic metaphysical facts will not change and therefore logic and methematics, which are derived from those facts, will not change. It will never be the...

There are some things we can knowwill be true regardless of how much natural law we know; basic metaphysical facts will not change, such as Non-contradiction, etc.

This argument has not been covered in our debates, nor in the debates I have read you having with JB.

You will find in the past I have only presented you with a single argument on this topic, not...

The point I raise here is not one I have raised to you before.

To consider the supernatural as an explanation for any event you first need to offer a positive definition for the supernatural and evidence for it's existence. There is a burden of proof that must...

1) A positive definition for the term "God" which is not self contradictory.

2) Evidence for the existence of the defined God.

I love my life and my mind too much to submit them to the extreame...

When discussing reality you cannot use faith as a basis for your evidence.

Does God tell us what is good because it is good, or is it good because
God tells us?
In the first instance morality is objective and it would be moral with or without God.
In the second instance...

LOL.