That can't really be established when there have been no wars between factions equivalent in modern terms to those of WWII. It's just a bunch of pussy-footing around now.
A soldier can't fight an explosion, nor is a soldier inherently a bad guy. A casualty is a casualty. Also, you're still absolving Japan of doing worse than the US did. The US fought a retaliatory war...
You already negged me, halfwit. You didn't bother to . . . understand my post considering that the concept you were expressing whether there is a source preaching it or not is invalid.
All Japan had to do was surrender after their war of aggression proved fruitless. They didn't. They also had a nuclear program, FYI, which they would have used if they had time. And I like how you...
They shouldn't have started the war then. Look, if a midget insists on continually kicking me in the shins, I'm eventually going to punt the little dude, I'm not going to just pretend he's not there.
I'm not suggesting there needs to be a war in Iran, but if there were Iran's trump card would be its standard military might, not a fledgling nuclear program.
That's more likely to happen by conventional means. A relatively clean modern nuke in a low population area would do MORE to intimidate a country than a drawn-out conventional war with millions of...
The Japanese were fighting a losing battle as soon as the war began. If it were true that the Japanese were inclined toward surrender simply for the fact that they weren't doing all that well, they...
I think it would be more effective to, instead of focusing on border security, to just cut undocumented immigrants off from any sort of government service. The reason poor people come here is because...
To begin with, we are talking about abortion. If a woman doesn't want to raise a child but is okay with bearing one, she's pro-life and the ability to have an abortion is a moot point in her case.