Again, they're not basing the entire thing on that, it was just a demonstration. It's a known fact that people will freeze up and fail in critical situations.
It's just ordinary gloves, his inability to perform had nothing to do with the gloves, pulling a gun with gloves is simple. This was due to him being untrained to act in this type of situation.
They didn't start by shooting that guy, they randomly fired at people in the room. Besides, that people are unable to act in moments of crisis is not something new, it's a well knows fact.
You mean interviewing people who train law enforcement officers to be able to handle them selves in pressed situations, someone who actually knows this? and showing that even a person with 100s of...
You didn't explain what was unbalanced about the information given in the video. The purpose was to show how people react in a critical situation, not even the guy with 100s of hours of gun...
It's a "hit piece" against people overestimating their ability to act rationally during a crisis. Not against concealed carry, what about the video was unbalanced?
No, I don't know what happened before, because they chose to edit it out, thanks for confirming what I've said this whole time, finally. I'm not reading anything into it.
No, I can see very clearly where they cut straight to the reactions from the protestors without showing what happens before. Why are you defending this piece of garbage (fox news) "journalism"?
I'm saying that the part before the attacks were cut out, so it's impossible to determine what the interviewer did, they were probably cut out for a reason.
I didn't say it deserved an physical attack, but there are a lot of words that will incite a physical attack. They have clearly chosen to edit the tape in such a way and completely remove what...
Lol strong editing, cut to the violent parts but remove everything preceding it, aka go provoke people, cut out the provocation parts and only show their reaction.
