Search:
Type: Posts; User: Vegan
Search :
Search took 0.18 seconds.
That's true with alligator eggs, but I have never heard anything about it with chicken eggs.
Anyway, people may be able to choose who they have sex with, but they can't choose which sex they are...
"It does NOT make it void, because who's to say that what is natural isn't right? Who has proved this???"
The whole concept of morality is proof in and of itself. Morality can only exist when...
LOL, you keep telling yourself that.
If you are going to insist that morals are personal and that there is no such thing as an inherent code of ethics, then there is nothing to argue with you.
I direct you to my previous post in which your argument was thoroughly refuted: http://www.forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=590700&page=2&pp=30
Ok, so I guess you can't link to specific...
"we capture all the lions in the wild, and force feed them vegetables, to be more moral. what would happen? the antelope, zebra, gazelle, etc populations would explode, and instead of a quick death,...
When you eat meat, you are needlessly having an animal killed because you could just as easily eat plant material.
"lol I know of the naturalistic fallacy and it voids nothing I said.
"
*Sigh*. You said that it is ok to eat meat because we, too, are part of the food chain, and we just so happen to be at the...
Hah, I know nobody is going to change their minds based on anything that I write, I just like to argue for the hell of it sometimes.
Your little rant and rave had absolutely nothing to do with, well, anything. Did you even bother to read what you wrote? To sum it up for you, you are trying to argue that because I am...
Morals are not about being perfect. Morality is about comparing the choices you make, with the other choices that you could have made.
That being said, as an 18 year old full-time college...
"how do you know that the tomato that you munch on is screaming in pain? and like i said before why arent plants given the benefit of the doubt?"
I am not going to explain this again, 2 times...
Not wanting to needlessly cause suffering is now known as "off the wall craziness"? Too bad more people aren't crazy, then.
For someone who is so good at spouting facts, I am surprised that you are not so worried about citing your sources? How about we make that a habit? Go find me some sources which prove that we could...
"so your saying what animals are doing is wrong? And how can you compare a murderer to a lion that kills to survive."
Try reading my post next time. Lions are incapable of making choices, thus...
"show me one single shred of evidence for that please."
Sentience cannot really be proven, it has to be inferred...Based on their physiological likeness to humans, it only makes sense to assume...
Animals are sentient beings, while plants are not. It is as simple as that.
Wierd, same answer that 99% of people give when this question is posed to them...I wonder why?
What couldn't Kerry make up his mind about?