Search:

I'v got a glock 19. First gun ever and I am too going into law enforcement. The local agency here uses it actually. Great gun - can't go wrong with a glock. The 19 is a little big, but still compact....

looks like a photoshop to me

False.

Bystander effect is null in this case. If the guy was aware enough to record - he was not "unable" to call the police due to the bystander effect. Also, these people were doing this to the...

That's not the way things work. You should be the one to give up your permit since you clearly don't know when it's acceptable to use lethal force. Just because you have the means to defend yourself...

First of all - I would bet money that if the guy who recorded this video called the police right when this activity started - they would have caught those individuals. They also would have definitely...

definitely not impossible. I turned 21 4 months ago and I got mine a month after. All you have to do is take a gun safety class and have proof, apply to your local county. I live in Oregon.

As...

I don't know where you are from - but most insurance companies cover damage from non-vehicular incidents. Granted you'll have a deposit - but in the scenario.. it's better to have some damage than be...

No it wouldn't. If they had a gun - then yes. The only situation that may be acceptable would be them punching his car, and while he flee's for safety - he accidently hits them.

You have to...

He would easily be convicted for it as well. The jury would easily recognize that the driver PUT himself in a life or death situation. An individual that say's: "oh i got out to get their insurance."...

No - you would have still been charged with murder.

I applaud the balls this guy had to get out - but it was the wrong decision. Everyone who says they would have got out if they had a CCW/gun, would be serving jail time.

a CCW is for life or...

http://i28.tinypic.com/2aan9sw.jpg

If you give permission for an officer to search your property, and that officer does not have any PC, you, as the person being searched, has full right to stop the search at anytime. Frisk is not...

Ehhhh.

You are forgetting that an officer can search in areas where the suspect/driver can physically reach. So if that suspect can reach under the seat - officer can search there without pc....

You should really calm down.

PS, you can even frisk someone if their attire is inconsistant with the weather. Let me give you in example, since you'll need one.

(It's 12:30 am at night, you see...

From my CJ education, I will always mirandize everyone I detain/arrest right then and there. The way we do it here is read off the miranda card, just to make sure we have read it to 100% and so that...

Again, my responses have nothing to do with my psyche. If anything, it would do with the formal training I have had.

That's understandable - but you have to look at it from their point of view. It's very hard for society to understand what LEO's have to deal with on a daily basis. We are trained to prepare for the...

And what would make you think that? There was nothing in my post that even remotely relates to psychology. I only say that the stop/frisk was legal because of officer safety.


ps, i'v already...

The officer did ask him questions, but Miranda was not needed as he clearly was not handcuffed or detained.