Search:

Haha, very clever. I especially liked the second one.

I went off to Hartlepool to buy a pair of exploding trousers.

I think doing two body parts would be better(antagonists), since you would cause some major imbalances.

Some good recommendations toward the end of this article.

http://www.t-nation.com/free_online_article/sports_body_training_performance/the_thib_system_8212_fatigue_and_best_exercises&cr=

I believed he followed a fullbody routine, as most did back then.

No back exercises?

This should give you a rough idea.

http://www.t-nation.com/readArticle.do?id=651322

I agree with you. But the examples you've given are elite athletes, they're the best of the best. It takes years and years to work up to that kind of workload.

Indeed it was. High-Threshold Muscle Building was also a good read.

If you need to ask yourself this question, i think you should cut.

Try donkey calf raises. I agree, normal calf raises are absolute crap.

Good work on the squats too.

You're 100lbs jus sayin. LOL jk

But seriously, you're 100lbs.

But when your diet is perfect, your training does matter.

Lol 5yr bump, you mad?

Progression is what will cause your legs to grow. So don't progress.

If you train chest once a week, why not try hitting it twice a week?

I scanned this from an issue of muscle mag.

Larry's are still bloody huge.

1. Not enough volume( if your goal is muscle growth)
2. Not enough frequency
3. Bad overlap

Rep/set schemes are good though, maybe try an upper/lower split?

Rubbish.

For neurological(strength) gains, the more you can bench without over doing it the better.

If you want a good bench then bench, but dont forget to work assisting muscle groups just as hard.

3...