Search:

http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2008/10/2/128674572854790178.jpg

incureging

edit: god damn it

its painful to read some of the things you post. since when do ****lians wear red coats, line up and march forward with muskets?

hint: they don't you stupid ****

clicked

done

in


..

http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_kz247bFXO81qztwlro1_500.jpg

brb posting in the indian subforum

this is largely an american forum?

just sayin brah, i don't have anything against sikhs i just think rules should apply to all

no one is making him dishonor his religion just like no one is making him join the armed services. serving is a privilege, not a right, and he should have to follow the same rules as every other...

just sayin the way i think it should be

its still a choice on his part to follow said religion. the way i see it, either his desire to serve is more important and thus he makes some sacrifices just like everyone else who joins, or his...

did he not choose to be part of the religion?



In a way it is the same. His religious commitment is fine and good but should not be an excuse to bend the rules that everyone else has to follow....

im not sure, but i think it has something to do with the fact that he is IN THE ARMY.

a woman's hair will fit in a helmet, will it not?

no, the man is a soldier, and an officer in the army. his job in the army is to work on teeth. if he didn't want to conform to what the military requires he should have been a civilian dentist

not entirely sure what you mean by "the troops need the support they need".

very mature argument though, im impressed.

elaborate

no, because christians and catholics have no problem adhering to grooming standards or wearing a helmet.