Ronnie Coleman 5' 11", 280 lbs contest weight
Jay Cutler 5' 9" , 270 lbs contest weight
both have the same weight, discard about the definition, who look bigger?
Printable View
Ronnie Coleman 5' 11", 280 lbs contest weight
Jay Cutler 5' 9" , 270 lbs contest weight
both have the same weight, discard about the definition, who look bigger?
this thread is AWESOME!
I love the pics!!!
i love how this thread has never been done before!!
op, you are AWESOME!!!
Pictures for comparison?
[QUOTE=Kmart23;505280351]this thread is AWESOME!
I love the pics!!!
i love how this thread has never been done before!!
op, you are AWESOME!!![/QUOTE]
just discuss who look bigger and real monster, can't find the pic, if anyone have please pose the pic.
[QUOTE=marsandsun;505279711]Ronnie Coleman 5' 11", 280 lbs contest weight
Jay Cutler 5' 9" , 280 lbs contest weight
both have the same weight, discard about the definition, who look bigger?[/QUOTE]
This isnt' even fair. These guys competed against each other and Ronnie always won barring injuries. Also Cutler isn't 280. If he was he'd have more muscle than Coleman and we all know that's not even near the truth. Jay was competing in the 260's or high 250's this last O, so even his heavy years when he was holding some fat and water might have been 270's. Ronnie held a THIN film of water and no fat in the 03 Mr. O and came in at 287, almost 290. He still had more narrow waist than Jay, 10x the seperation and detail, etc....
Jonnie Boleman for sure.
Ronnie is 5'10, jay is 5'8.5. Ronnie was BIGGER then jay. Jay is naturally wider But so is his waist. Ronnie crushes jay in upper leg size, chest and back thickness and arms
[QUOTE=T3mpest;505282251]This isnt' even fair. These guys competed against each other and Ronnie always won barring injuries. Also Cutler isn't 280. If he was he'd have more muscle than Coleman and we all know that's not even near the truth. Jay was competing in the 260's or high 250's this last O, so even his heavy years when he was holding some fat and water might have been 270's. Ronnie held a THIN film of water and no fat in the 03 Mr. O and came in at 287, almost 290. He still had more narrow waist than Jay, 10x the seperation and detail, etc....[/QUOTE]
i think jay is around 275lbs, in 3-4 week out he is still 287 lbs.
[QUOTE=-SLIX-;505283001]Ronnie is 5'10, jay is 5'8.5. Ronnie was BIGGER then jay. Jay is naturally wider But so is his waist. Ronnie crushes jay in upper leg size, chest and back thickness and arms[/QUOTE]
jay shoulder look wider than ronnie, but how come ronnie chest widder than jay, not just wide but lower chest is longer.
who have the wider midsection, when abs pose, i saw jay have wider oblique but his ripped abs may make you look he have smaller abs compare to ronnie.
Ronnie outmassed Jay every time they were on stage together.
'99 Ronnie vs '09 Jay
[IMG]http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c52/FlangMasterJ/ronjay13.jpg[/IMG]
(Found the image on some random site)
[QUOTE=flangmasterj;505290381]'99 Ronnie vs '09 Jay
[/QUOTE]
Ronnie
/thread
[QUOTE=flangmasterj;505290381]'99 Ronnie vs '09 Jay
[IMG]http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c52/FlangMasterJ/ronjay13.jpg[/IMG]
(Found the image on some random site)[/QUOTE]
ronnie wins^^^^^^great pics but we dont even need pics to now coleman was more bigger and leaner then jay...........iam a massive jay fan btw so no hate intended...
If from the front.. ronnie looks bigger, but if from the side..jay looks thicker
[QUOTE=flangmasterj;505290381]'99 Ronnie vs '09 Jay
[IMG]http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c52/FlangMasterJ/ronjay13.jpg[/IMG]
(Found the image on some random site)[/QUOTE]
thats one of my chops from this thread
[url]http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=122659611[/url]
[QUOTE=flangmasterj;505290381]'99 Ronnie vs '09 Jay
[IM]http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c52/FlangMasterJ/ronjay13.jpg[/IMG]
(Found the image on some random site)[/QUOTE]
The scaling isn't the best, here is a vid from 2005 when Ronnie was a huge 286 lbs and Jay holds his ground, in 1999 Ronnie was smaller and in the pic he looks bigger than 2009 Jay
[youtube]xZJinqH2dic[/youtube]
[QUOTE=flangmasterj;505290381]'99 Ronnie vs '09 Jay
(Found the image on some random site)[/QUOTE]
mhm Ronnie was only around 240 in 99 i believe so maybe scaling is slightly off. but the seperation and detail of Coleman over Jay is just undeniable. GOAT
[QUOTE=INMATEaco;505300381]thats one of my chops from this thread
[url]http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=122659611[/url][/QUOTE]
Reps to you.
It's doing the rounds.
Ronnie's muscle jumped off his bones when he hit poses. Jay's doesn't.
obviously scaling is waaaaaaaaay off on that one.
and for those guys that says Ronnies 99 beats 09 Jay is making a huge mistakes...no freaking way brahs..
If both go toe to toe in their prime - Coleman wins.
And I am a Cutler fan being objective....
[QUOTE=MesoPeaks;505311831]obviously scaling is waaaaaaaaay off on that one.
and for those guys that says Ronnies 99 beats 09 Jay is making a huge mistakes...no freaking way brahs..[/QUOTE]
I knew it was only a matter of time before Meso was here. You saying Jay beats the GOAT's best showing? :rolleyes:
Ronnie reminds me of a gargoyle with those huge lats
[QUOTE=MesoPeaks;505311831]and for those guys that says Ronnies 99 beats 09 Jay is making a huge mistakes...no freaking way brahs..[/QUOTE]
Inserts 'not sure if srs' jpeg.
People go on like Jay's '09 physique was something out of this world. The fact is his symmetry wasn't great, his upper body still lacked the detail that his legs had and his conditioning was only great in comparison to what he had previously bought to the stage but in comparison to the other top five it was nothing special. Now Jay's conditioning compared to a '99 Ronnie is not even worth debating.
Ronnie had virtually no weaknesses. Every muscle group was developed. He was conditioned, symmetrical and separated.
A '99 Ronnie beats an '09 hands down.
[QUOTE=the-craig;505315001]I knew it was only a matter of time before Meso was here. You saying Jay beats the GOAT's best showing? :rolleyes:[/QUOTE]
99 imo was not his best showing, id say either 2003 or 2005. Ronnie looked great also in 2004. But, 2009 Jay would beat any Ronnies, except lol (what MesoPeaks? :D) 2003 I think.
However, Jays 06 package could beat 03 Ronnies
[QUOTE=MesoPeaks;505315771]99 imo was not his best showing, id say either 2003 or 2005. Ronnie looked great also in 2004. But, 2009 Jay would beat any Ronnies, except lol (what MesoPeaks? :D) 2003 I think.
However, Jays 06 package could beat 03 Ronnies[/QUOTE]
Now I'm 100% sure you are not being serious.
Grandad should put a padlock on his liquor cabinet.
Jay Cutler has never been close to 280lbs in contest shape.
[QUOTE=flangmasterj;505316521]
Grandad should put a padlock on his liquor cabinet.[/QUOTE]
lol
[QUOTE=MesoPeaks;505315771]99 imo was not his best showing, id say either 2003 or 2005. Ronnie looked great also in 2004. But, 2009 Jay would beat any Ronnies, except lol (what MesoPeaks? :D) 2003 I think.
However, Jays 06 package could beat 03 Ronnies[/QUOTE]
No version of Jay could beat Ronnie in practically any year, other than 02 I would say.
Seek help, Meso. You are in great need of it.
[QUOTE=spamy;505302421]The scaling isn't the best, here is a vid from 2005 when Ronnie was a huge 286 lbs and Jay holds his ground, in 1999 Ronnie was smaller and in the pic he looks bigger than 2009 Jay
[youtube]xZJinqH2dic[/youtube][/QUOTE]
nice video but muscular size difference is epic - side chest is like wtf @ difference
[QUOTE=flangmasterj;505290381]'99 Ronnie vs '09 Jay
[IMG]http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c52/FlangMasterJ/ronjay13.jpg[/IMG]
(Found the image on some random site)[/QUOTE]
ronnie hands down.