Jigsaw's not even around anymore, mind as well take him off the list.
Printable View
Jigsaw's not even around anymore, mind as well take him off the list.
[QUOTE=Jyeatbvg;444393371]Jigsaw's not even around anymore, mind as well take him off the list.[/QUOTE]
I'll e-mail him if his vote can have an influence. Otherwise you're right.
Keep any 5 - Votes 3 (Pro_Shark) (Nodice123) (NYY)
Keep 6 : Must be split (2 hitter, 2 pitcher, 1 h/b then 1 FA keeper) - Votes 4 (Max~Power, Exist 2 Inspire, Jyeatbvg, Texas Heat)
Keep 5: 2 from rounds 1-4, 2 from rounds 5-10, 1 from 10+ - Votes 2 (bbacn123, , Chill Will 33, saaltydog)
[QUOTE=saaltydog;444911171]Keep any 5 - Votes 3 (Pro_Shark) (Nodice123) (NYY)
Keep 6 : Must be split (2 hitter, 2 pitcher, 1 h/b then 1 FA keeper) - Votes 4 (Max~Power, Exist 2 Inspire, Jyeatbvg, Texas Heat)
Keep 5: 2 from rounds 1-4, 2 from rounds 5-10, 1 from 10+ - Votes 3 (bbacn123, , Chill Will 33, saaltydog)[/QUOTE]
waiting on
jkeithc82
89FoxBody
Jigsaw (gonna e-mail him here soon and let everyone know when he responds)
Makes no difference to me.
[QUOTE=jkeithc82;444950901]Makes no difference to me.[/QUOTE]
notsureifsrs.gif
[QUOTE=jkeithc82;444950901]Makes no difference to me.[/QUOTE]
alright, 89Foxbody and Jigsaw are left
In b4 3-way tie
[QUOTE=saaltydog;444911171]Keep any 5 -[b] Votes 3 [/b] (Pro_Shark) (Nodice123) (NYY)
Keep 6 : Must be split (2 hitter, 2 pitcher, 1 h/b then 1 FA keeper) - [b]Votes 4[/b] (Max~Power, Exist 2 Inspire, Jyeatbvg, Texas Heat)
Keep 5: 2 from rounds 1-4, 2 from rounds 5-10, 1 from 10+ -[b] Votes 4[/b] (bbacn123, , Chill Will 33, saaltydog, 89Foxbody)[/QUOTE]
I disagree with keep any 5 because it reduces the important of drafting well. Just my opinion.
[QUOTE=89FoxBody;444967521]I disagree with keep any 5 because it reduces the important of drafting well. Just my opinion.[/QUOTE]
ok. I'll let everyone know what Jigsaw picks. sh*t is gonna hit the fan if he goes with any 5. lmfao
Don't tell him how many votes each option has, or else he will vote for it just to be a troll lol.
[QUOTE=89FoxBody;444969381]Don't tell him how many votes each option has, or else he will vote for it just to be a troll lol.[/QUOTE]
already sent the email with a link to this thread so he can pretty much check it out at will.
I don't think Jigsaw would f*ck it up on purpose like that. I trust him enough to give his real opinion.
[QUOTE=bbacn123;444971571]already sent the email with a link to this thread so he can pretty much check it out at will.
I don't think Jigsaw would f*ck it up on purpose like that. I trust him enough to give his real opinion.[/QUOTE]
Lol I know, I was just kidding brah.
People in OPTION B AND C need to decide which one we want so that OPTION A doesnt win.
The Majority of the league doesnt want ANY 5 players, just sayin.
[QUOTE=TexasHeat;444972491]People in OPTION B AND C need to decide which one we want so that OPTION A doesnt win.
The Majority of the league doesnt want ANY 5 players, just sayin.[/QUOTE]
It's only behind by 1 vote, just sayin...
[QUOTE=Pro_Shark;444973381]It's only behind by 1 vote, just sayin...[/QUOTE]
OPTION B/C are very similar and nothing like OPTION A.
So, in effect, it is splitting the vote, jut sayin.
[QUOTE=TexasHeat;444973971]OPTION B/C are very similar and nothing like OPTION A.
So, in effect, it is splitting the vote, jut sayin.[/QUOTE]
I would argue that B and C aren't very similar. They both have similar ideas, but they are different.
I just don't understand how C would work once we are 2-3 years into this league.
[QUOTE=Pro_Shark;444976571]I would argue that B and C aren't very similar. They both have similar ideas, but they are different.
I just don't understand how C would work once we are 2-3 years into this league.[/QUOTE]
The same thing will happen with option B.
Your concern is that in a couple years, there will be no good players left to draft, and that's a legit issue, but the same thing will happen with option B. People are obviously gonna keep their best players, and eventually they will all have keeper status.
[QUOTE=89FoxBody;444978011]The same thing will happen with option B.
Your concern is that in a couple years, there will be no good players left to draft, and that's a legit issue, but the same thing will happen with option B. People are obviously gonna keep their best players, and eventually they will all have keeper status.[/QUOTE]
I understand that. I realize that is the reason people want B and C. I voted for A, because I want full control on who I keep.
Here is my dilemma with C though. We draft this season, play, and choose our keepers just like normal. Next season, we draft, play, and then how would the keeper thing work? We would have rounds assigned to each player that wouldn't be consistent the next season. For example, I draft someone in our second year that I want to keep instead of one of my previous keepers. His value would be inflated because of the chunk of players already gone before him.
[QUOTE=TexasHeat;444972491]People in OPTION B AND C need to decide which one we want so that OPTION A doesnt win.
The Majority of the league doesnt want ANY 5 players, just sayin.[/QUOTE]
or people in option A can change their vote. We can eliminate the one that's obviously not going to win (option A) and everyone votes again.
multi-round voting ftmfw
also I agree with Pro_Shark..
Option B works the best and if we add in like 1 or 2 FA keepers then everyone can keep their prospects
[QUOTE=TexasHeat;444973971]OPTION B/C are very similar and nothing like OPTION A.
So, in effect, it is splitting the vote, jut sayin.[/QUOTE]
well if ur ass didn't bail on ur first vote C would have won, but you have no faith.
[QUOTE=Chill Will 33;445167121]well if ur ass didn't bail on ur first vote C would have won, but you have no faith.[/QUOTE]
You are right, I shoudn't be able to change my mind, I forgot I wrote my vote down in cement.
I sincerely apologize.
[QUOTE=TexasHeat;445226351]You are right, I shoudn't be able to change my mind, I forgot I wrote my vote down in cement.
I sincerely apologize.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, but the funny thing is it was only done to try and insure that A wouldnt win. Strong fail on your part. i think it will be funny if Jigsaw chooses A personally, even though its not what I want.
[QUOTE=bbacn123;445227491]Yeah, but the funny thing is it was only done to try and insure that A wouldnt win. Strong fail on your part. i think it will be funny if Jigsaw chooses A personally, even though its not what I want.[/QUOTE]
I could easily change back if that was the case, who is going to stop me? No, that was just a small fraction of the reason.
I already explained the major reason why I changed my vote, you can go back to page 3 if you need to refresh.
[QUOTE=TexasHeat;445228421]I could easily change back if that was the case, who is going to stop me? No, that was just a small fraction of the reason.
I already explained the major reason why I changed my vote, you can go back to page 3 if you need to refresh.[/QUOTE]
I'm not allowing any more vote changing. Any one person could just change their vote at the end to decide the outcome and that's bullsh*t.
I'll just drop out of the whole league altogether.
If it ends in a tie we'll have to figure some other way to decide this.
[QUOTE=TexasHeat;445228421]
I already explained the major reason why I changed my vote, you can go back to page 3 if you need to refresh.[/QUOTE]
And yeah, I can go back and look
[QUOTE=TexasHeat;444299111][b]I don't want option A, so doing what I can to void it at all costs.[/b] Plus Option B allows me to keep a prospect if I want too and still 5 major league keepers.[/QUOTE]
Sounds like that's the primary reason in this sentence. You're willing to do whatever it takes at all cost to not let A win....f*cking lol
[QUOTE=bbacn123;445230411]And yeah, I can go back and look
Sounds like that's the primary reason in this sentence. You're willing to do whatever it takes at all cost to not let A win....f*cking lol[/QUOTE]
No it was at mot 50% of the reason. Who has always been the one pushing for drafting prospects. That would be me, so how you could say that being able to keep one extra free agent pickup wasn't a major factor in changing my vote simply blows my mind.
If jigsaw forces a 3 way tie, I would not care which 3 we go with to be honest.
If theres a 3 way tie. I'll vote...
We should have a limit of 5 moves a week to prevent streaming pitchers.
Hopefully everyone can be on the same page with this one.
[QUOTE=TexasHeat;445240341]No it was at mot 50% of the reason. Who has always been the one pushing for drafting prospects. That would be me, so how you could say that being able to keep one extra free agent pickup wasn't a major factor in changing my vote simply blows my mind.
If jigsaw forces a 3 way tie, I would not care which 3 we go with to be honest.[/QUOTE]
i dont know about you, but whenever someone says they're doing something to avoid something else at all costs, that's generally the main reason.
Now all of a sudden you don't care which 3 if it ends in a tie? lol come on man....
Just laugh at the irony of this and move on brah.
Edit:
If you're so fine with it I'm changing my vote to keep any 5 now.
So here's the new voting:
Keep any 5 - Votes 4 (Pro_Shark) (Nodice123) (NYY) (bbacn123)
Keep 6 : Must be split (2 hitter, 2 pitcher, 1 h/b then 1 FA keeper) - Votes 4 (Max~Power, Exist 2 Inspire, Jyeatbvg, Texas Heat)
Keep 5: 2 from rounds 1-4, 2 from rounds 5-10, 1 from 10+ - Votes 3 (Chill Will 33, saaltydog, 89Foxbody)
Not that I wouldn't love to circle jerk argue about keeper options for another 3 pages but with registration possibly opening as early as next week, should we go ahead and make sure stats, roster spots, playoff scheduling, maximum/minimum innings for pitchers, trade deadline, waiver wire time, possible live draft times, etc. are all ironed out?