-
Is bestiality wrong?
If so, plz explain why, thx.
inb4 animals can't consent.
They don't consent to being eaten or turned into leather either.
Also, it appears not all agree they can't consent.
[quote=wiki]
It is not an uncommon practice for dogs to attempt to copulate with ("hump") the legs of people of both genders.
Rosenberger (1968) emphasizes that as far as cunnilingus is concerned, dogs require no training, and even Dekkers (1994) and Menninger (1951) admit that sometimes animals take the initiative and do so impulsively
Animals such as dogs can be willing participants in sexual activity with humans, and "seem to enjoy the attention provided by the sexual interaction with a human."[/quote]
For your time
[img]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Wb0Drvm90VY/URerOdHZ8qI/AAAAAAAAQug/dznXa7hK_pk/s1600/white_horse_with_sexy_girl_wallpaper_hd.jpg[/img]
-
If this was 2012, probably, but brah, It's almost 2014
Of course its not wrong. Shoot we have legalized homo***gotry going on, who the FUARK say's I can't love my animal the way I want to.
No hypocrite *** can tell me that I'm in the wrong for plowing the anal cavity of my beautiful female puppy.
She doesn't struggle and she loves it, so it is consensual.
-
[QUOTE=lasher;1180509981]If so, plz explain why, thx.
inb4 animals can't consent.
They don't consent to being eaten or turned into leather either.[/QUOTE]
It's only wrong if you have sex with an animal that's the same sex as you and if you have sex outside of marriage and that's the important thing, it's what separates us from the animals.
And please, sex is such a dirty word, it's called making love.
-
^ Very insightful.
Anyone have an actual srs answer?
You cannot argue consent. We do brutal things to animals every day to get food and various animal products. Why can't self gratification be included? Besides, it could be argued that animals (some at least) can consent. You can get a dog to dry hump your leg.
[quote=wiki]
It is not an uncommon practice for dogs to attempt to copulate with ("hump") the legs of people of both genders.
Rosenberger (1968) emphasizes that as far as cunnilingus is concerned, dogs require no training, and even Dekkers (1994) and Menninger (1951) admit that sometimes animals take the initiative and do so impulsively
Animals such as dogs can be willing participants in sexual activity with humans, and "seem to enjoy the attention provided by the sexual interaction with a human."[/quote]
-
[QUOTE=lasher;1180513421]^ Very insightful.
Anyone have an actual srs answer?[/QUOTE]
Not too sure, what are the theological reasons?
-
[QUOTE=guyver79;1180514181]Not too sure, what are the theological reasons?[/QUOTE]
Could you please stop trying to change the subject? I don't care about homosexuality, marriage, or theology ITT. Thanks.
-
No, some people believe that they are an animal trapped in a humans body. Who are we to judge them? We don't know the daily pain they for being a trapped animal? If, they truly are an animal trapped in a human body then they will be able to get consent from their real species.
-
PHC where you at breh? Come enlighten me (nozoomo)
-
It would only be wrong if a hybrid was born like half horse half human
Nomsaying
-
It's called interspecies erotica you insensitive peasant.
-
Right and wrong is completely suggestive on any topic.
Right and wrong is based on decisions made by groups, communities, tyrants, dictators etc.
We place ourselves in control by government or are forced to abide by the rules set by government lest we suffer the consequences by doing that has been deemed wrong by those in charge if caught.
-
[QUOTE=hammerfelt;1180519841]Right and wrong is completely suggestive on any topic.
Right and wrong is based on decisions made by groups, communities, tyrants, dictators etc.
We place ourselves in control by government or are forced to abide by the rules set by government lest we suffer the consequences by doing that has been deemed wrong by those in charge if caught.[/QUOTE]
yea yea, morality is all relative nowadays I get it.
So here's the rephrase.
Is there a compelling argument to give against legalizing bestiality?
-
[QUOTE=pazzadean;1180519071]It would only be wrong if a hybrid was born like half horse half human
Nomsaying[/QUOTE]
Woah woah woah...I'm sorry this is wrong. It would only be RIGHT if a hybrid were born.
-
Hey guys what's going on in this thre...........
Bunch of people complaining that it's illegal to phuck cats and dogs you say?
See ya
-
[QUOTE=lasher;1180514371]Could you please stop trying to change the subject? I don't care about homosexuality, marriage, or theology ITT. Thanks.[/QUOTE]
I only asked because some, what you might refer to as "theological" rules such as no sex outside marriage, no same sex relationships ect.... actually make sense if you think in terms of financial and social standing and a tribe mentality, a dowry for a daughter and political connections to other families and tribes, children are produced in a heterosexual relationship, children help strengthen the tribe, bastard children are a burden because it's another mouth to feed, monogamous relationships will help lessen the number of std's ect... you could make a logical case for all the above especially 2000+ years ago not just because "when you put a willy in another mans bum it makes baby Jesus cry"
-
[quote]Location: Hollywood, Florida, [/quote]
South of Peace
-
[QUOTE=guyver79;1180522711]I only asked because some, what you might refer to as "theological" rules such as no sex outside marriage, no same sex relationships ect.... actually make sense if you think in terms of financial and social standing and a tribe mentality, a dowry for a daughter and political connections to other families and tribes, children are produced in a heterosexual relationship, children help strengthen the tribe, bastard children are a burden because it's another mouth to feed, monogamous relationships will help lessen the number of std's ect... you could make a logical case for all the above especially 2000+ years ago not just because "when you put a willy in another mans bum it makes baby Jesus cry"[/QUOTE]
Guyver, do you support beastiality? Yes or No, and why?
-
[QUOTE=guyver79;1180522711]I only asked because some, what you might refer to as "theological" rules such as no sex outside marriage, no same sex relationships ect.... actually make sense if you think in terms of financial and social standing and a tribe mentality, a dowry for a daughter and political connections to other families and tribes, children are produced in a heterosexual relationship, children help strengthen the tribe, bastard children are a burden because it's another mouth to feed, monogamous relationships will help lessen the number of std's ect... you could make a logical case for all the above especially 2000+ years ago not just because "when you put a willy in another mans bum it makes baby Jesus cry"[/QUOTE]
I don't care about any of that. I want to hear good secular reasons for why bestiality should remain illegal. Stop being so obsessively myopic. If you have nothing to offer on the topic other than to keep bringing up homosexuality, theology, or baby jesus, then stop wasting our time.
-
[QUOTE=TaeBoNinja;1180523411]South of Peace[/QUOTE]
Just trying to open up my options brah. Don't be a bigot.
-
It's not necessarily 'wrong'...but it's not something I'm interested in, nor should really be considered 'normal'
-
[QUOTE=flairon;1180525341]It's not necessarily 'wrong'...but it's not something I'm interested in, nor should really be considered 'normal'[/QUOTE]
Should it remain illegal? If so, why?
-
Pets don't consent to be pets. We pick them up from the pound and assume they are happy.
Should castration/spading be illegal?
We are, after all, removing an animal's ability to reproduce without it's consent.
-
I think people could argue that when you kill animals to eat them, they die instantly, so they don't really suffer that much. But if you open the door to legalize fking animals, then some people could abuse it and be cruel to animal by going in dry and it's cruel...etc..
-
[QUOTE=Alchem;1180528571]I think people could argue that when you kill animals to eat them, they die instantly, so they don't really suffer that much. But if you open the door to legalize fking animals, then some people could abuse it and be cruel to animal by going in dry and it's cruel...etc..[/QUOTE]
It's possible to have sex with animals without causing damage. We could simply regulate the activity, just like we do with regular sex. It would of course be illegal to abuse the animal.
Like Wiki of peace says
[quote=Wiki of Peace]
Rosenberger (1968) emphasizes that as far as cunnilingus is concerned, dogs require no training, and even Dekkers (1994) and Menninger (1951) admit that sometimes animals take the initiative and do so impulsively
Animals such as dogs can be willing participants in sexual activity with humans, and "seem to enjoy the attention provided by the sexual interaction with a human."[/quote]
-
[QUOTE=lasher;1180528931]It's possible to have sex with animals without causing damage. We could simply regulate the activity, just like we do with regular sex. It would of course be illegal to abuse the animal.
Like Wiki of peace says[/QUOTE]
How can it be regulated tho? like if you hurt women while having sex with her, she can speak out and tell you to stop, and if you didn't stop, she would leave you or report u..etc.. how can the same be said for animals? they could be in pain. but can't express it.. I'm not denying that some animals enjoy sex with humans, I'm just saying that if you open the door then it can be abused.
-
[QUOTE=Alchem;1180528571]I think people could argue that when you kill animals to eat them, they die instantly, so they don't really suffer that much. But if you open the door to legalize fking animals, then some people could abuse it and be cruel to animal by going in dry and it's cruel...etc..[/QUOTE]
An animal abuser does not follow the law, so the law should not be influenced by their actions. It would be like banning knives because one kid stabbed another. Don't take knives away from the millions that don't stab each other because of that one kid.
[QUOTE=Alchem;1180530021]How can it be regulated tho? like if you hurt women while having sex with her, she can speak out and tell you to stop, and if you didn't stop, she would leave you or report u..etc.. how can the same be said for animals? they could be in pain. but can't express it.. I'm not denying that some animals enjoy sex with humans, I'm just saying that if you open the door then it can be abused.[/QUOTE]
Animals make noise and flinch when in pain. It isn't too difficult to tell.
-
[QUOTE=Alchem;1180530021]How can it be regulated tho? like if you hurt women while having sex with her, she can speak out and tell you to stop, and if you didn't stop, she would leave you or report u..etc.. how can the same be said for animals? they could be in pain. but can't express it.. I'm not denying that some animals enjoy sex with humans, I'm just saying that if you open the door then it can be abused.[/QUOTE]
Animals can't report their own physical abuse, and we still manage to make abusing them illegal. We can't just assume people will abuse their animals. We open the door to them being abused by keeping them as pets. It's no different.
[quote=Wiki of peace]
Utilitarian philosopher and animal liberation author Peter Singer argues that zoophilia is not unethical so long as it involves no harm or cruelty to the animal[117] (see Harm principle). In the article "Heavy Petting,"[118] Singer argues that zoosexual activity need not be abusive, and that relationships could form which were mutually enjoyed. Singer and others have argued that people's dislike of bestiality is partly caused by irrational speciesism and anthropocentrism.[119][120] Because interspecies sex occurs in nature,[121] and because humans are animals,[122] supporters argue that zoosexual activity is not "unnatural" and is not intrinsically wrong.[81][123][/quote]
[quote=Wiki of peace]
"In other recent surveys, the majority of zoophiles scoffed at the notion that they were abusive toward animals in any way—far from it, they said. Many even consider themselves to be animal welfare advocates in addition to zoophiles."[124][/quote]
[quote=Wiki of peace]
Jacob M. Appel has also advocated for the decriminalization of bestiality, arguing that lack of consent is not a meaningful concept when discussing human-animal sex. He has written that society does "not describe owning a pet dog as kidnapping, even when the canine is restricted to the inside of a home, although confining a human being in the same manner would clearly be unethical." He also states that animals do not "consent" to have sex with each other. According to Appel, such relations "may well be neutral or even pleasurable for the animals concerned", and are primarily prohibited because of social taboos and knee-jerk reactions.[125] He argues that there are no defensible philosophical reasons for the creation of anti-zoosexual laws which prohibit non-cruel bestiality, and that such laws are unjust, irrational and discriminatory.[125] He also believes that current negative attitudes towards zoophilia may be a result of cultural relativism, since other cultures in the past have accepted it.[53][54] In 2011, American attorney Carl Person listed bestiality as one of several "victimless crimes" he felt should not be regulated. He later stated that he does not not practice or advocate bestiality and "threw (it in) for the sake of controversy."[126]
Research has proven that non-human animals can and do have sex for non-reproductive purposes (and for pleasure).[127] In 2006, a Danish Animal Ethics Council report concluded that ethically performed zoosexual activity is capable of providing a positive experience for all participants, and that some non-human animals are sexually attracted to humans[128] (for example, dolphins).[129][124][/quote]
-
[QUOTE=lasher;1180528931]We could simply regulate the activity, just like we do with regular sex.
[/QUOTE]
Human sex is regulated? interdasting
The animal cannot report abuse to the authorities so laws should exist to protect them
-
[QUOTE=Rem0;1180530731]Human sex is regulated? interdasting
The animal cannot report abuse to the authorities so laws should exist to protect them[/QUOTE]
Humans can report abuse to authorities so laws should not exist to protect them.
-
[QUOTE=lasher;1180525571]Should it remain illegal? If so, why?[/QUOTE]
I honestly can't think of a reason biologically why not.
Please, just lube up those hamsters beforehand won't you lasher?