-
[QUOTE=tryin2gethuge10;864525031]Yea, I get defensive when people gay bash, a good friend of mine is gay. I see what you're saying bro.[/QUOTE]
You are ******* yourself too... what the hell - we are all homos here. Let's celebrate!!
-
[QUOTE=MaximusPlatypus;864512471]So I can't ask a general question about a guy now? Sheesh
Also, it does make a difference if someone is gay or not... every characteristic of a person contributes to whether or not you are a fan of them.
Ridiculous political correctness frowns upon this... but finding out if this guy is gay is just as relevant to most people in forming an opinion of him as is asking Phil Heath if he plays xBox or PS3.
lol why would anyone let society tell them they can't form an opinion on someone that takes into account one of their CORE characteristics as a human being???
Gay hate is wrong.. taking into account someone's lifestyle choices when forming an opinion of them is not wrong. Some people take it too far, others like yourself go too far in the other direction and throw stones at anyone expressing their right to form opinions about other people.
lol strong generalization. "Studies show homophobes are homos"... let's see that study pal.
More like, "Studies show extreme homophobes have a marginally higher tendency to have homosexual desires than the avg person"
then people like you blow it out of proportion.
There are many, many homophobes that don't have an ounce of homosexuality in them... that I can guarantee. To label anyone who doesn't support the homosexual lifestyle as a homosexual themselves is ridiculous, and very likely inaccurate.
Not supporting gay hate at all, just can't stand to see facts getting bastardized in the name of political correctness[/QUOTE]
Good post man.
And to clarify I'm not a homophobe, I just don't wanna see the dude's pecker while working out. How many of you would watch this video in front of friends or family?
Exactly. Stfu.
-
I would wear those pants doing legs and I wouldn't give a f*ck.
-
What was he thinking when choosing pants?
-
[QUOTE=IwillBaMonster;864541811]You are ******* yourself too... what the hell - we are all homos here. Let's celebrate!![/QUOTE]
Asbrus can be our power bottom.
-
[QUOTE=DPNZ;864553321]I would wear those pants doing legs and I wouldn't give a f*ck.[/QUOTE]
If I had his legs I would show them off every chance I got, But I don't. :(
-
[QUOTE=IwillBaMonster;864541811]You are ******* yourself too... what the hell - we are all homos here. Let's celebrate!![/QUOTE]
Yea when I said my friend I really was talking about me! :D
-
Dude really is the Quad God, his legs are in-fckin-sane!
-
His physique is sub-par based on what I see online...decent size but really poor genetics
[img]http://gallery.rxmuscle.com/newgallery/DSC_8827_JGAAAKHBHQ.jpg[/img]
-
[QUOTE=whatkey;864687051]His physique is sub-par based on what I see online...decent size but really poor genetics
[img]http://gallery.rxmuscle.com/newgallery/DSC_8827_JGAAAKHBHQ.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
Honestly if I was 40lbs bigger that's what I would look like. Proportionately.
My legs dominate everything. Upper legs at least.
-
That contest pic is making me think he may be natural. Anybody else?
-
[QUOTE=wjs010;864695851]That contest pic is making me think he may be natural. Anybody else?[/QUOTE]It's just you.
BTW OP knows how to choose a title for his thread to get more views and posts.
-
[QUOTE=spamy;864726151]It's just you.
BTW OP knows how to choose a title for his thread to get more views and posts.[/QUOTE]
You forgot that if people aren't really conditioned the majority of people always assume their natural.
Only really shredded dudes are on AAS my man.
-
[QUOTE=wjs010;864695851]That contest pic is making me think he may be natural. Anybody else?[/QUOTE]I think he'd get pretty mad if someone came to him for natty advice.
-
why is he called quad god? i don't see it
-
[QUOTE=tsiparlanaeht;864728211]You forgot that if people aren't really conditioned the majority of people always assume their natural.
Only really shredded dudes are on AAS my man.[/QUOTE]Then Ronnie was the nattiest ever.
[img]http://i75.servimg.com/u/f75/11/85/63/23/411.jpg[/img]
-
[QUOTE=tsiparlanaeht;864728211]You forgot that if people aren't really conditioned the majority of people always assume their natural.
Only really shredded dudes are on AAS my man.[/QUOTE]
A few pics of my natty mate, he got pretty bloody lean...
[img]http://www.naturalbodzmagazine.com/images/scottreynoldscollage.jpg[/img]
-
[QUOTE=DPNZ;864761981]A few pics of my natty mate, he got pretty bloody lean...
[/QUOTE]
that's more the exception than the rule, top notch conditioning tbh. natty's have so much less water retention issues
-
The only people who don't think his "pants" looks ridiculous are those who've spent way too long on BB sites. Like I said the first time, they look absurd. A few guys in here seem very butt hurt over this notion, are overly sensitive & defensive, and thus accuse others of being homosexuals themselves to point out the glaring hilarity of this guys insanely ridiculous clothing choice. Really, anybody who finds fault in this guy's tights are by virtue of their criticism homos? Show the vid to women and guys alike and they'll all have a good laugh over his attire. It serves no purpose that flexible shorts wouldn't and is tantamount to walking around naked on his bottom half. That this has to even be explained to some people here who feign not seeing anything wrong with it shows how inept your perspective is.
-
[QUOTE=Skoorbmax;864781891]The only people who don't think his "pants" looks ridiculous are those who've spent way too long on BB sites. Like I said the first time, they look absurd. A few guys in here seem very butt hurt over this notion, are overly sensitive & defensive, and thus accuse others of being homosexuals themselves to point out the glaring hilarity of this guys insanely ridiculous clothing choice. Really, anybody who finds fault in this guy's tights are by virtue of their criticism homos? Show the vid to women and guys alike and they'll all have a good laugh over his attire. It serves no purpose that flexible shorts wouldn't and is tantamount to walking around naked on his bottom half. That this has to even be explained to some people here who feign not seeing anything wrong with it shows how inept your perspective is.[/QUOTE]
You mean you didn't think it was professional or appropriate for a magazine to post this video with his chosen attire? you don't say..........I was hoping sports illustrated would follow suit. I think most people would be quite offended by his attire, and it would probably be reprimanded at many gyms.
-
You knobs forgot to mention those that just don't give a single f*ck what some random joker is wearing to the gym.
This thread is a total mess.
-
Butthurts gonna butthurt
Are you insecure about your own sexuality or what is it?
-
[QUOTE=OliFs;864799601]Butthurts gonna butthurt
Are you insecure about your own sexuality or what is it?[/QUOTE]Exactly! A guy wearing those tights around does seem a bit confused.
-
[QUOTE=DPNZ;864761981]A few pics of my natty mate, he got pretty bloody lean...
[img]http://www.naturalbodzmagazine.com/images/scottreynoldscollage.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
[img]http://sarcasmmeter.net/sarcasm_detector.jpg[/img]
-
[QUOTE=PaLftr;864545961]Good post man.
And to clarify I'm not a homophobe, I just don't wanna see the dude's pecker while working out. How many of you would watch this video in front of friends or family?
Exactly. Stfu.[/QUOTE]
Just come out of the closet already, sheesh. Take it for what it is, a leg training vid. You sound all hot and bothered by the fact you can make out his pecker through his tights.
A lot of puns in there...
-
[QUOTE=spamy;864761451]Then Ronnie was the nattiest ever.
[img]http://i75.servimg.com/u/f75/11/85/63/23/411.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
I honestly believe Ronnie was natural through out his whole career.
-
[QUOTE=MaximusPlatypus;864512471]So I
lol strong generalization. "Studies show homophobes are homos"... let's see that study pal.
More like, "Studies show extreme homophobes have a marginally higher tendency to have homosexual desires than the avg person"
[/QUOTE]
[url]http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/04/120406234458.htm[/url]
-
[QUOTE=MrJohnnie;864899041][url]http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/04/120406234458.htm[/url][/QUOTE]
LOL, BLAM! EVIDENCE IN YO FACE!
But seriously, those studies are complete crap. The experiments don't show control groups, location of college students, and a plethora of other criteria that is necessary for "serious" empirical data. If social experiments want to get taken seriously in the scientific world, they better begin adhering to the criteria if they want to be taken seriously in it, otherwise find another way of making arguments.
For the most part, I don't think science is necessary when talking about a topic as ambiguous as sexuality. For those of who are comfortable with their sexuality (a strong amount of the IFBB forum posters ;) ), you can tell when someone is insecure about it because you understand your own sexuality better than they do.
-
[QUOTE=Loctus;864824031][img]http://sarcasmmeter.net/sarcasm_detector.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
What are you implying?
-
[QUOTE=DPNZ;865003101]What are you implying?[/QUOTE]That stercs was only kidding.