-
LOL
Ken Ham Can't observe, so we can't comment on it
fking ken, fuk you
-
[QUOTE=Azure84;1201911151]Please quote ANY of this supposed evidence he presented and show us how much you were paying attention. Unless the evidence was "because the bible says so" there wasn't any.[/QUOTE]
I'll do you one better. Watch RIGHT NOW because he's doing it again.
Just because you don't take his evidence to draw the same conclusion doesn't mean it isn't evidence. I believe he said something very similar to that in his opening presentation.
-
[QUOTE=Ashen;1201911881]who dafuq would wanna watch this?
Creationism is the epitome of stupidity. Not gonna risk losing IQ points.
srsly why the **** is this a 'debate'?[/QUOTE]
Because you didn't see evolution so its wrong DUH!
-
[QUOTE=MUFC;1201911591]Don't reproduce, though, judging by your location, you and your sister have a handful of perfectly retarded children to feed.[/QUOTE]
You're so angry.
-
someone aware me on what he keeps referring to as 'historical science'
-
Goodnight sweet creationism.
Not a single shred of solid evidence to back up creationism. While evolution has the whole of science on its side. Literally every organism is an example of evolution (along with all of the molecular work done to further validate it). Bill Nye the science guy hero just has to show up and he's already won.
-
This guy is a legit potato. I don't think he heard anything Bill said.
-
Wtf am I listening to? Strong rebuttle is strong. I want Bill to talk about space and rip this man a new angus.
edit: He said it again. oh my god, "you didn't see it so it isn't real" wtf man.
-
[QUOTE=IIIWolverineIII;1201912141]I'll do you one better. Watch RIGHT NOW because he's doing it again.
Just because you don't take his evidence to draw the same conclusion doesn't mean it isn't evidence. I believe he said something very similar to that in his opening presentation.[/QUOTE]
He's not.
"you ahve to know the amount of the parent and daughter isotope at the start" No you don't. Radioactive decay is a first order operation, it doesnt depend on initial concentration.
-
Ken Hamm Meme Generator:
[img]http://wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/files/2012/08/ken-ham-creation-museum1.jpg[/img]
[url]http://memegenerator.net[/url]
This has potential..
-
[QUOTE=NaturalFTW;1201912551]someone aware me on what he keeps referring to as 'historical science'[/QUOTE]
this.
-
strong premade powerpoint rebuttal
-
wow this guy actually believes the earth is six thousand years old.
-
Bill Nye ----------------------------------- - vs -------------------------------------------------- - Ken Ham
[img]http://www.jamesaltucher.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/8-Mile-Papa-Doc.png[/img]
-
"have the fish sinners done something wrong?" hahahahhahaahahahah good job bill man
-
Kim:God did it
Bill:Countless scientific explanations debunking his claims
Kim:God did it
......................guess god did it guys
-
[QUOTE=ho_124;1201913081]wow this guy actually believes the earth is six thousand years old.[/QUOTE]
He's believing the guy who was there to observe it
-
[QUOTE=DasWunderBrah;1201912981]this.[/QUOTE]
Ham's terms:
Observable science: things we actually observed (so it's fact)
Historical science: we weren't alive at the time to see the object observed (so you can't say it's real)
srs
-
[QUOTE=Workout4ever;1201913651]Kim:God did it
Bill:countless scientific explanations
Kim:God did it
......................guess god did it guys[/QUOTE]God started the big bang nom sayin.
-
Bill's first couple sentences just destroyed Ken's complete 5 minute speech lmao.
-
Don't really understand why most of you who don't agree with Ken have to resort to name calling and being overall immature.. I'm not backing up either side but just saying..
-
-
[QUOTE=MUFC;1201913761]He's believing the guy who was there to observe it[/QUOTE]
This. Written by a bunch of dudes a few thousand years ago....
-
bill is laying the hammer down now
-
fukkk lmao christians of peace
-
[QUOTE=TheBlackHombre;1201913851]Ham's terms:
Observable science: things we actually observed (so it's fact)
Historical science: we weren't alive at the time to see the object observed (so you can't say it's real)
srs[/QUOTE]
so in other words " we weren't there so therefore it was god"
-
[QUOTE=MirinMyFlow;1201914251]lol at lion comment[/QUOTE]
this
-
[QUOTE=lolhey;1201913931]Bill's first couple sentences just destroyed Ken's complete 5 minute speech lmao.[/QUOTE]
this, bill is going [I]ham[/I] right now
-
Vegan Lion is more socially conscious than regular lion.
-
[QUOTE=NaturalFTW;1201912551]someone aware me on what he keeps referring to as 'historical science'[/QUOTE]
using science to learn more about the past, the past which we weren't here to experience firsthand.
