Obesity: An Overblown Epidemic? (article included)
From [url="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&articleID=000E5065-2345-128A-9E1583414B7F0000&pageNumber=1&catID=2"]Scientific American[/url]:
[quote]What is really going on, asserts Oliver, a political scientist at the University of Chicago, is that "a relatively small group of scientists and doctors, many directly funded by the weight-loss industry, have created an arbitrary and unscientific definition of overweight and obesity. They have inflated claims and distorted statistics on the consequences of our growing weights, and they have largely ignored the complicated health realities associated with being fat."
The overweight segment of the "epidemic of overweight and obesity" is more likely reducing death rates than boosting them.
One of those complicated realities, concurs Campos, a professor of law at the University of Colorado at Boulder, is the widely accepted evidence that genetic differences account for 50 to 80 percent of the variation in fatness within a population. [b]Because no safe and widely practical methods have been shown to induce long-term loss of more than about 5 percent of body weight[/b], Campos says, "health authorities are giving people advice--maintain a body mass index in the 'healthy weight' range--that is literally impossible for many of them to follow."
By exaggerating the risks of fat and the [b]feasibility of weight loss[/b], Campos and Oliver claim, the CDC, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the World Health Organization inadvertently perpetuate stigma, encourage unbalanced diets and, perhaps, even exacerbate weight gain. "The most perverse irony is that we may be creating a disease simply by labeling it as such," Campos states.[/quote]
Bolded parts are mine.
Cliff notes:
[i]Some wacky scientitians are saying since most people fail to lose weight, weight loss is virtually impossible and should be blamed on genetics and population variance. The health risks related to obesity are way overblown.[/i]