-
[QUOTE=FeelTheFear;1048241441]that's not true at all.
And by the way, there are actually way more serious injuries and deaths from circumcision than are recorded. A lot of the time, a death from circumcision will just be jotted down as "blood loss" or some other complication.[/QUOTE]
Cite sources to 100+ kids in the US dying yearly from circumcision performed by licensed doctors.
-
[QUOTE=PeenutButtah;1048153051]I would give him the scissors and let him make his own decision.[/QUOTE]
Funny that you said that because my uncle actually did brah.... Srs
-
[QUOTE=Tears;1048240081]My son.
umad??[/QUOTE]
so you are bragging about how you are going to mutilate your kids genitals without his consent, and reduce the amount of sexual pleasure he can experience, for no valid medical reason? interesting
-
Cutting off the end of your son’s penis
What a strange and barbaric practice
A true test of enlightenment
-
[QUOTE=shroomed;1048243371]You are part of the problem. The "aesthetic" argument is possibly the worst of them all. You don't seem to realize that what is aesthetically pleasing changes significantly depending on where you are in the world and the era you live in. In Europe, the uncut look is favoured. In America prior to about 1900, it was the same. The rate of circumcision is dropping; you haven't the slightest clue what will be considered aesthetically pleasing during your child's lifetime.
Besides, if a woman turned someone down based on their foreskin status they are a shallow, judgemental bitch and not worth your time anyway. When erect, an uncut penis doesn't look very different to a cut one, because the foreskin rolls back. If you're going to subject an infant to a surgical body modification to change such a minor thing, risking all the problems that come with it, then I must say I'd think considerably less of you as a person.[/QUOTE]
the entire argument on what is visibly pleasing works both ways. You can't say circumcision is invalid because Europeans think it less attractive.
-
[QUOTE=Tears;1048245821]the entire argument on what is visibly pleasing works both ways. You can't say circumcision is invalid because Europeans think it less attractive.[/QUOTE]
who the **** is saying that? theyre saying circumcision is retarded because it reduces sexual pleasure, has a myriad of health risks, violates a childs right to bodily integrity, and has no valid medical reason
-
[QUOTE=Psychotropic;1048245551]Cutting off the end of your son’s penis
What a strange and barbaric practice
A true test of enlightenment[/QUOTE]
You obviously don't know what circumcision is.
-
wow @ how many cutters there are here. an ancient barbaric ritual? gtfo.
-
[QUOTE=FeelTheFear;1048244661]so you are bragging about how you are going to mutilate your kids genitals without his consent, and reduce the amount of sexual pleasure he can experience, for no valid medical reason? interesting[/QUOTE]
What's interesting is your rustled jimmies.
-
[QUOTE=FeelTheFear;1048246501]who the **** is saying that? theyre saying circumcision is retarded because it reduces sexual pleasure, has a myriad of health risks, violates a childs right to bodily integrity, and has no valid medical reason[/QUOTE]
No conclusive evidence on it reducing sexual pleasure. Evidence is contradictory, in fact.
-
[QUOTE=FeelTheFear;1048246501]who the **** is saying that? theyre saying circumcision is retarded because it reduces sexual pleasure, has a myriad of health risks, violates a childs right to bodily integrity, and has no valid medical reason[/QUOTE]
You should either learn to read or stop replying.
-
I would keep him uncut so he can make the decision later in life.
-
Have a son a did not have him circumcised
-
I'm circumcised and like it.....don't remember it happenning and would have it done for my son
-
Nope. Just gotta remind the cheeky little **** to wash his dickhead everyday. Shouldn't have any hygiene issues if the habit of washing is cultivated early on.
-
I was cut at birth and my son (if I have one) will not be.
A part of my body was stolen from me.
Also it is 2013 only jews and wild Africans mutilate sexual organs.
-
Father of a 5 month old boy checking in. No I didn't have part of his dik cut off. I love my son. You don't have someone cut the dik of a person that you love. If my son grows up and decides he wants someone to cut part of his dik off, that's his business.
-
[QUOTE=HIIT;1048172761]We seem to be avoiding the central issue here.
1. Male Jews are circumcised.
2. Male Jews control commerce, finance, business, government, the world.
I rest my case.
HAPPY EASTER, Y'ALL![/QUOTE]
Feel free to adopt the rest of their traditions as well.
-
-
I love it how there are kunts who think they're absolute comedians when they pick the 3rd option.
-
-
[QUOTE=SPQR44;1048247361]No conclusive evidence on it reducing sexual pleasure. Evidence is contradictory, in fact.[/QUOTE]
So removal of erogenous tissue increase sexual pleasure? interesting
-
Circumcision is banned in Germany. Just sayin
-
[QUOTE=FeelTheFear;1048254371]So removal of erogenous tissue increase sexual pleasure? interesting[/QUOTE]
Strong lack of evidence in your post.
-
[QUOTE=Tears;1048247581]You should either learn to read or stop replying.[/QUOTE]
So let's take a look at your post:
"the entire argument on what is visibly pleasing works both ways. You can't say circumcision is invalid because Europeans think it less attractive."
No one ever made that claim at all. I reinforced what the actual reasoning is, which has nothing to do with attractiveness at all.
Care to explain why I need to learn to read?
-
Lol @ all the anteaters voting no.
If you got your kid circumsized, he'd be so thankful for it later on lol. Don't be stupid.
-
[QUOTE=CroForce;1048254721]Circumcision is banned in Germany. Just sayin[/QUOTE]
An ugly penis makes for more productive worker.
No wonder banging German chicks became easier.
-
[QUOTE=SPQR44;1048255831]Strong lack of evidence in your post.[/QUOTE]
The foreskin is erogenous tissue. This is commonly known
The foreskin is also the most sensitive part of the penis
[url]http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847[/url]
here's a picture demonstrating sensitivity on a cut vs intact penis from that study
[img]http://www.thewholenetwork.org/uploads/4/2/0/2/4202929/8961017.jpg?420[/img]
-
[QUOTE=CroForce;1048254721]Circumcision is banned in Germany. Just sayin[/QUOTE]
It's actually not. They brought it back because jews were complaining that the government was being anti-semitic, and they didn't want to be seen like that.
LOL
-
[QUOTE=FeelTheFear;1048255891]So let's take a look at your post:
"the entire argument on what is visibly pleasing works both ways. You can't say circumcision is invalid because Europeans think it less attractive."
No one ever made that claim at all. I reinforced what the actual reasoning is, which has nothing to do with attractiveness at all.
Care to explain why I need to learn to read?[/QUOTE]
Because the claim was made by someone that you can't ultimately judge what is more visibly appealing, therefore, the 'circumcision is better looking' argument is invalid. But, the same can be said for the opposite.
Did I say you said it? No. You're too busy trying to push your ideals on to everyone else.
