[QUOTE=OneMA2011;1017704113]230 shredded, maybe more with muscle confusion[/QUOTE]
Damn if this is true.. Never thought I'd be able to be 230 pounds especially not 230 shredded.
Printable View
[QUOTE=OneMA2011;1017704113]230 shredded, maybe more with muscle confusion[/QUOTE]
Damn if this is true.. Never thought I'd be able to be 230 pounds especially not 230 shredded.
In. What is my naturallimit?
[QUOTE=lankywhitekid;1017709413]Is this real life? FATS ARE NOT STORED AS FAT. ffs. Insulin is also an important hormone. It's one of the most anabolic hormones out there.[/QUOTE]
Fats are more likely to be stored as fats than carbs or proteins due to there structure.
Do you even know what anobolism is? Here is a hint it aint just about building muscle. Anything new that is created in the body is done by annobolic pathways. (anabolic creates, catabolism brakes down). Once muscle and liver glycogen stores are full carbs can only be stored as fat
Yo onema whats my natty potential?
Do me <3 nh
In4 lols
[QUOTE=KilluaTheKid;1017743333]In4 lols[/QUOTE]
This lol
ONEMA is clearly trolling
[QUOTE=OneMA2011;1017704113]
234lbs @10%
215@8%[/QUOTE]
215 8% not sheriff cereal.. My max would be 180 at 8 srs
[QUOTE=lankywhitekid;1017709413]Is this real life? FATS ARE NOT STORED AS FAT. ffs. Insulin is also an important hormone. It's one of the most anabolic hormones out there.[/QUOTE]
No, fats are stored in the body in like the stomach etc? Insulin causes them to be stored??? What don't you get imo?
[QUOTE=Endymi0n;1017710773]5'9'', 170 lbs, small frame. Been training for nearly 2 years, whats my limit?[/QUOTE]
Probably 200 <10%BF but you'll look bigger due to small frame
[QUOTE=Rabie72;1017710923]Damn if this is true.. Never thought I'd be able to be 230 pounds especially not 230 shredded.[/QUOTE]
Only limits are dedication and heart
[QUOTE=Gudino95;1017711263]In. What is my naturallimit?[/QUOTE]
245 @8% easily. You'll have to be getting all your amino acids and stuff tho.
[QUOTE=respare;1017723353]Fats are more likely to be stored as fats than carbs or proteins due to there structure.
Do you even know what anobolism is? Here is a hint it aint just about building muscle. Anything new that is created in the body is done by annobolic pathways. (anabolic creates, catabolism brakes down). Once muscle and liver glycogen stores are full carbs can only be stored as fat
Yo onema whats my natty potential?[/QUOTE]
See, dis guy knows.
Well bro, considering you're only 1lb atm I think you can easily bulk to a solid 5'11 250 @10% then cut to 245@8%
[QUOTE=OmegaMurray;1017726043]Do me <3 nh[/QUOTE]
hehehehe hihi <3 nh
You can easily hit 210 shredded (4-5% BF) with dedication and heart. If you were getting good supplements and stuff then I could see you hitting 220 @6%
[QUOTE=KilluaTheKid;1017743333]In4 lols[/QUOTE]
You can easily hit 195 @7%
[QUOTE=Medinaaaa;1017748103]This lol
ONEMA is clearly trolling[/QUOTE]
Idk what you guys mean...
but you can easily be 215lbs shredded. Maybe more depending on if you powerlift or if you don't do cardio
[QUOTE=BrandonTe;1017789333]215 8% not sheriff cereal.. My max would be 180 at 8 srs[/QUOTE]
Your only limit is your mind. Expand your mind and the gainz will come
tuff one here.
in.
5'9 136 13%BF ectomorph
doubt you can do this one lol
[QUOTE=CallMeSkinny;1017804623]tuff one here.
in.
5'9 136 13%BF ectomorph
doubt you can do this one lol[/QUOTE]
190 8% BF
Easy
[QUOTE=OneMA2011;1017811633]190 8% BF
Easy[/QUOTE]
You didn't do mine :(
[QUOTE=LiftingSteve93;1017815993]You didn't do mine :([/QUOTE]
Ididtho :(((((
[QUOTE=LiftingSteve93;1017388533]Tell me pls[/QUOTE]
6'3. I can easily see you hitting 310 @single digits. Powerlifting builds strong dense muscle that weighs more than bodybuilding muscle so you should be fine with that target.
ITT: broscience general
could you do mine
[QUOTE=OneMA2011;1017819103]Ididtho :(((((
6'3. I can easily see you hitting 310 @single digits. Powerlifting builds strong dense muscle that weighs more than bodybuilding muscle so you should be fine with that target.[/QUOTE]
I can't believe I didn't see it, a thousand apologies good sir
[QUOTE=Hockey1123;1017325793]I mean you can loose weight by cutting carbs, but thats more because naturally you will be in a big deficit cutting out carbs. In order to cut optimaly and maintain muscle which is what i think you would want to do... then cutting out carbs is not a good idea[/QUOTE]
I know this was posted ages ago, but it's annoyed me.
If we think back 5-10 thousand years or so - pre-biblical times. Our ancestors were predators. They were powerful, fast and athletic. They hunted to survive. Do you think those guys were gorging on bread and big bowls of pasta? Course not. Their diets were made up of what they could find and what they could kill. So we're talking meat, fish, fruit, vegetables and nuts. Their diet was high protein, relatively low fat, low carbohydrate. This is the way the human body was designed to eat and is the way humans have eaten for millions of years. I find it hard to believe that you're suggesting that eating the way that the human body is adapted to eat would be a bad idea, and that it would be hard to maintain muscle mass by eating that way.
you need carbs and fats for muscle development and cutting, anyone who takes a basic nutrition class knows this.
[QUOTE=Bugler666;1017824753]I know this was posted ages ago, but it's annoyed me.
If we think back 5-10 thousand years or so - pre-biblical times. Our ancestors were predators. They were powerful, fast and athletic. They hunted to survive. Do you think those guys were gorging on bread and big bowls of pasta? Course not. Their diets were
made up of what they could find and
what they could kill. So we're talking
meat, fish, fruit, vegetables and nuts.
Their diet was high protein, relatively
low fat, low carbohydrate. This is the
way the human body was designed to
eat and is the way humans have eaten
for millions of years. I find it hard to
believe that you're suggesting that
eating the way that the human body
is adapted to eat would be a bad idea,
and that it would be hard to maintain
muscle mass by eating that way.
[/QUOTE]
Our ancestors weren't bodybuilders pheggit
Pretty sure I remember OP admitting to taking gear. And this thread is a total troll
144 lbs apparently.
and OP, your not taking into consideration any wrist/ankle measurements.
What's my natty limit OP?
I'm 18 but still growing taller
What would be the natural limit of someone 6'0", 290 lbs, 33% bf?
OP I read your advice and I decided to cut out not only fats and carbs, but protein too.
My test levels are risen 900%!
This thread is so gay
[QUOTE=illuminattty;1017819933]ITT: bro[B]science[/B] general[/QUOTE]
Yes SCIENCE
[QUOTE=MATTtheLIFT3R;1017820383]could you do mine[/QUOTE]
Sure 5'10 215 shredded to the bone
[QUOTE=Bugler666;1017824753]I know this was posted ages ago, but it's annoyed me.
If we think back 5-10 thousand years or so - pre-biblical times. Our ancestors were predators. They were powerful, fast and athletic. They hunted to survive. Do you think those guys were gorging on bread and big bowls of pasta? Course not. Their diets were made up of what they could find and what they could kill. So we're talking meat, fish, fruit, vegetables and nuts. Their diet was high protein, relatively low fat, low carbohydrate. This is the way the human body was designed to eat and is the way humans have eaten for millions of years. I find it hard to believe that you're suggesting that eating the way that the human body is adapted to eat would be a bad idea, and that it would be hard to maintain muscle mass by eating that way.[/QUOTE]
All correct
[QUOTE=derieu;1017825793]you need carbs and fats for muscle development and cutting, anyone who takes a basic nutrition class knows this.[/QUOTE]
Nope. Lol Nope
[QUOTE=Tb0282;1017828783]Our ancestors weren't bodybuilders pheggit[/QUOTE]
Musclez
[QUOTE=DoWorkSon515;1017830873]Pretty sure I remember OP admitting to taking gear. And this thread is a total troll[/QUOTE]
Nope. Low dedication and no faith. Your max is 174lbs @15%
[QUOTE=Ewys;1017839393]144 lbs apparently.
and OP, your not taking into consideration any wrist/ankle measurements.[/QUOTE]
I don't need to, I'm really good
Your max is 235lbs @9.5%
[QUOTE=2am;1017841293]What's my natty limit OP?
I'm 18 but still growing taller[/QUOTE]
217lbs @8%
[QUOTE=RoeyM;1017892803]What would be the natural limit of someone 6'0", 290 lbs, 33% bf?[/QUOTE]
Easily 250lbs single digit body fat. Maybe a bit more with BCAAs and Aminos and chit.
[QUOTE=Gaiza;1017908673]OP I read your advice and I decided to cut out not only fats and carbs, but protein too.
My test levels are risen 900%![/QUOTE]
See. This is true results
[QUOTE=l2evolution;1017916123]This thread is so gay[/QUOTE]
No u
Ok op, im in, 6'4 250lbs @ 12% bf, enlighten me as to what my natty limit is
[QUOTE=ZackeryVon;1017337593]Zyzz hasn't had a carb in over a year.[/QUOTE]
I LOLed hard... :) At least this is true :D
5'6 190 = wot is limit
[QUOTE=OneMA2011;1017321213]Well considering you're 6'3 I reckon you can easily get to a solid 250lbs @10%. Maybe more if you have good genetics?
Also depends on BCAAs and ECAs and stuff. [B]Creatine isn't fully natty[/B] but as long as you don't take more than 5g it's ok.[/QUOTE]
OP U trolling? Or are you just retarded?
I'm 235 lb in the morning at around 16% body fat, at 6'4". I've been training for a year and a half. My legs are huge, my arms are probably one of my weaker parts and they're almost 17 inches cold. My wrists are 7.5, ankles 9.5. What's my genetic potential and how long will it take, around 4 years in total?