Save yourself. Cuz gubmint won't be there to save yo azz.
And Trump will be re-selected.
Don't let the statist kool aid kill your braincells.
Printable View
Save yourself. Cuz gubmint won't be there to save yo azz.
And Trump will be re-selected.
Don't let the statist kool aid kill your braincells.
I just want Ivanka, Melania, and Hope Hicks back.
[quote=deadwoodgregg;1699105673]i just want ivanka, melania, and hope hicks back.[/quote]
lmao
"If you have some money or a pistol, you can get something to eat." -- Richard Pryor.
OP is right that none of them will save you.
It’s also funny that no one sees the irony that T operates like The Union but is against them, and Brenden IS The Union and is against T.
LOL, wake up sheep.
If you want to make a difference, the primaries is where it's at.
[QUOTE=LWW;1699140583]OP [/QUOTE]
Not using his name anymore..
Does that mean the honeymoon is over?
I remember when you used to nut swing from him like a spider monkey in heat..
:D :D
[QUOTE=mtpockets;1699146783]Not using his name anymore..
Does that mean the honeymoon is over?
I remember when you used to nut swing from him like a spider monkey in heat..
:D :D[/QUOTE]
I emailed my buddy in the grip world just to see what thinks about a lumberjack who dosent do any lifting just saw a 3 and closed it like a nail clipper.
He said, Nah it’s a lie, people lie all the time. Nobody is closing a 3 like a nail clipper.
That came from a guy who knows what’s possible and isn’t, he himself is a closer of 3.5 gripper and he’s well over 6’ tall, no short weak man there.
[QUOTE=GeneralSerpant;1699142543]If you want to make a difference, the primaries is where it's at.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, but it's done wrong!!!
Why do Iowa, New Hampshire, etc. get an opportunity to select who runs before I do? Many times that "my candidate" is woefully behind if not already out of the race before I can vote.
Open the primaries up to everybody at once.
[QUOTE=LWW;1699151243][img]https://i.imgur.com/f873Zp2.gif[/img][/QUOTE]
Day # 84
LMAO....
Get over it toots....
[QUOTE=Payton1221;1699152753]Open the primaries up to everybody at once.[/QUOTE]Yeah, probably.
[QUOTE=Payton1221;1699152753]Yeah, but it's done wrong!!!
Why do Iowa, New Hampshire, etc. get an opportunity to select who runs before I do? Many times that "my candidate" is woefully behind if not already out of the race before I can vote.
Open the primaries up to everybody at once.[/QUOTE]
Because neither the states nor the parties would agree to that. The primary schedule is nominally set by each state, but in reality, is set by the political parties, since the parties have the power to reduce or even eliminate the votes of the delegates from states that don't abide by the party's primary schedule. The parties like the long campaign and primary season where they can do lots of events and suck up lots of money.
[QUOTE=mtpockets;1699152873]Day # 84
LMAO....
Get over it toots....[/QUOTE]
Fellas, see the above
That’s his way of saying he was full of chit, he thought since this is a bodybuilding site he can just say his buddy closed a 3 like a nail clipper and no one will really question it or care other than add to the “I am the Zen Master winter camper, lifter, cardio junkie, adventurer, and all my friends are top notch super humans”.
[QUOTE=LWW;1699154643]Fellas, see the above
That’s his way of saying he was full of chit, he thought since this is a bodybuilding site he can just say his buddy closed a 3 like a nail clipper and no one will really question it or care other than add to the “I am the Zen Master winter camper, lifter, cardio junkie, adventurer, and all my friends are top notch super humans”.[/QUOTE]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/3Jaweap.jpeg[/img]
[QUOTE=NorwichGrad;1699104093]Save yourself. Cuz gubmint won't be there to save yo azz.
And Trump will be re-selected.
Don't let the statist kool aid kill your braincells.[/QUOTE]
Who is "selecting" him and why? Why wasn't he "selected" last time? What did Joe do to lose favor with the selectors? Surely if there were powerful forces manipulating our leaders, wouldn't it stand to reason that it would be easier to control a guy fully within the throes of dementia like Biden? Not being a dick... I'm genuinely curious.
On a side note, I remember vaguely that you dumped a sh!tload of cash into crypto. You must be pretty happy right now given the recent rallies.
[QUOTE=NorwichGrad;1699104093]Save yourself. Cuz gubmint won't be there to save yo azz.
And Trump will be re-selected.
Don't let the statist kool aid kill your braincells.[/QUOTE]
Say something we don’t know.
[QUOTE=Karl_Hungus;1699157483]Who is "selecting" him and why? Why wasn't he "selected" last time? What did Joe do to lose favor with the selectors? Surely if there were powerful forces manipulating our leaders, wouldn't it stand to reason that it would be easier to control a guy fully within the throes of dementia like Biden? Not being a dick... I'm genuinely curious.
On a side note, I remember vaguely that you dumped a sh!tload of cash into crypto. You must be pretty happy right now given the recent rallies.[/QUOTE]
[quote]"The powers of financial capitalism had a far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences." [/quote]
The above quote is from Carroll Quigley’s "Tragedy and Hope,". That book and his "The Anglo American Establishment” are often quoted by anti-globalists, conspiracy theorists, etc. and I think is the core belief of what Norwich is trying to get at. The idea being elections in democratic nations are great for the ruling elite because they give citizens the idea that they have more influence than they actually do. Rotating the people / parties in power can help stave off the stagnation that can result in one person / party remaining in power too long.
Back to Quigley, conspiracy theorists are of the opinion that he exposes the globalist plot to establish an internationally governed neo-feudalism, with the elitist banking interests controlling everything for their own benefit.
But, as far as I can tell, the actual main thesis of Tragedy and Hope seems to be:
A) Powerful groups of wealthy individuals and captains of finance and industry congregate together in the same social and political circles to discuss where their mutual interests align and how they might work together,
B) These people use their wealth and influence to attempt to shape policy to their advantage, or whatever other ends they see fit at that time, and
C) Significant events such as WWII, the Cold War, the rise of leftist social/economic movements in the late 19th/early 20th century, etc. are not caused or controlled by these powerful interests, but merely manipulated and capitalized upon.
This all seems rather obvious and logical. Powerful people want to protect and further their interests and attempt to influence the government in order to do so. This doesn't automatically make them or what they do inherently bad or evil (even though it certainly could turn out to be).
Where Quigley seems to get slightly more conspiratorial (in the global-cabal-controlling-everything sort of arena) is in his book "The Anglo-American Establishment," where he details Cecil Rhodes' and the Milner Group's attempts to build a secret society of elites whose purpose would be furthering the imperial interests of the Anglosphere, and bringing all parts of the Commonwealth, America, and several other parts of the world under one imperial parliament. Several Rhodes affiliates later formed the CFR in America, the Bilderberg group, and the Trilateral Commission.
While we can certainly see these trends of globalism (versus simply globalization) in politics today, both in the EU and America, I'm more inclined to believe it's a result of A) powerful people looking out for their interests, as I mentioned above, and B) the genuine beliefs of well-meaning but terribly misguided internationalists. I'm hard pressed to find evidence of the evil capitalist/imperialist cabal's conspiracy to take over the world.
I think people have a hard time believing that much of human existence is just, at best, very loosely coordinated chaos - and most commonly a sloppy and mostly unknown web of cause and effect. It's tough for people to accept that there is no hyper-intelligent entity controlling what happens in the world, so they cling to things like religion and the Bilderberg group.
I must vote Biden out. Trump is my best shot. I don’t trust either just voting trump to get what I want is all. So I’ll still take chances with him. Much better under him we were hell I lived with Obama things didn’t go to **** until Biden.
I believe Hilary was supposed to win 2016 and that’s who was selected however Putin interfered and trump won. They didn’t put him in power the globalists. The elites didn’t like an outsider who’s not a team player winning therefore they unleashed Covid and demonized him about this time 4 years ago and it worked To get many morons to vote against him.
[QUOTE=7Seconds;1699224473]The above quote is from Carroll Quigley’s "Tragedy and Hope,". That book and his "The Anglo American Establishment” are often quoted by anti-globalists, conspiracy theorists, etc. and I think is the core belief of what Norwich is trying to get at. The idea being elections in democratic nations are great for the ruling elite because they give citizens the idea that they have more influence than they actually do. Rotating the people / parties in power can help stave off the stagnation that can result in one person / party remaining in power too long.
Back to Quigley, conspiracy theorists are of the opinion that he exposes the globalist plot to establish an internationally governed neo-feudalism, with the elitist banking interests controlling everything for their own benefit.
But, as far as I can tell, the actual main thesis of Tragedy and Hope seems to be:
A) Powerful groups of wealthy individuals and captains of finance and industry congregate together in the same social and political circles to discuss where their mutual interests align and how they might work together,
B) These people use their wealth and influence to attempt to shape policy to their advantage, or whatever other ends they see fit at that time, and
C) Significant events such as WWII, the Cold War, the rise of leftist social/economic movements in the late 19th/early 20th century, etc. are not caused or controlled by these powerful interests, but merely manipulated and capitalized upon.
This all seems rather obvious and logical. Powerful people want to protect and further their interests and attempt to influence the government in order to do so. This doesn't automatically make them or what they do inherently bad or evil (even though it certainly could turn out to be).
Where Quigley seems to get slightly more conspiratorial (in the global-cabal-controlling-everything sort of arena) is in his book "The Anglo-American Establishment," where he details Cecil Rhodes' and the Milner Group's attempts to build a secret society of elites whose purpose would be furthering the imperial interests of the Anglosphere, and bringing all parts of the Commonwealth, America, and several other parts of the world under one imperial parliament. Several Rhodes affiliates later formed the CFR in America, the Bilderberg group, and the Trilateral Commission.
While we can certainly see these trends of globalism (versus simply globalization) in politics today, both in the EU and America, I'm more inclined to believe it's a result of A) powerful people looking out for their interests, as I mentioned above, and B) the genuine beliefs of well-meaning but terribly misguided internationalists. I'm hard pressed to find evidence of the evil capitalist/imperialist cabal's conspiracy to take over the world.
I think people have a hard time believing that much of human existence is just, at best, very loosely coordinated chaos - and most commonly a sloppy and mostly unknown web of cause and effect. It's tough for people to accept that there is no hyper-intelligent entity controlling what happens in the world, so they cling to things like religion and the Bilderberg group.[/QUOTE]
I didn’t read every word of this, that’s for a lawyer, but from some of it I don’t know why you say “conspiracy theorist” because if you ever watched any of the global conference they actually say they want to see everything you do and control and it’s in the name of “security”. They flat out say this chit. I recall this creep scholar looking fella talking about making everyone have an app that shows if your vaccined so they can control what you do and where you go. They are freaks.