Yes, I am bored.
Printable View
Yes, I am bored.
I've never been that bored.
[QUOTE=mslman71;1010498583]I've never been that bored.[/QUOTE]You would be suprised at what you could learn. Rand Paul is an extreme right wing whacko. Glen Beck has no balls, and republicans and the tea party need to come to a reasonable solution to gun control.
[QUOTE=so-tex;1010501143]You would be suprised at what you could learn. Rand Paul is an extreme right wing whacko. Glen Beck has no balls, and republicans and the tea party need to come to a reasonable solution to gun control.[/QUOTE]
"We're right and the rest are stupid ignorant rednecks that have been conned into believing whatever the Koch brothers have told them." That about sum it up?
[QUOTE=mslman71;1010502833]"We're right and the rest are stupid ignorant rednecks that have been conned into believing whatever the Koch brothers have told them." That about sum it up?[/QUOTE]Pretty much. Should I believe them.:D
Did you know that the evil republicans want to cut back on the U.S. postal service hours, and that the U.S. postal service is vital to our survival?
[QUOTE=so-tex;1010504813]Pretty much. Should I believe them.:D[/QUOTE]
Yes. Be a part of the chosen people.
[QUOTE=so-tex;1010495543]Yes, I am bored.[/QUOTE]How's that working out for you?
[QUOTE=mslman71;1010509823]Yes. Be a part of the chosen people.[/QUOTE][img]http://www.septemberclues.info/images/JumpersIntoSheeplePit.gif[/img]
[QUOTE=cowboybiker;1010510453]How's that working out for you?[/QUOTE]Well, I am doing my part. I am probably paying for their electric bill since I am the only one watching. Love the commercials. Wait wut :confused: there are no commercials.
[QUOTE=so-tex;1010512933]Well, I am doing my part. I am probably paying for their electric bill since I am the only one watching. Love the commercials. Wait wut :confused: there are no commercials.[/QUOTE]Subliminal message advertising.
;)
[QUOTE=cowboybiker;1010514193]Subliminal message advertising.
;)[/QUOTE]You maybe right. All of a sudden, all I want to do is hug a tree. :eek:
[QUOTE=so-tex;1010516663]You maybe right. All of a sudden, all I want to do is hug a tree. :eek:[/QUOTE]Its time to look for an old John Wayne movie or something
[QUOTE=cowboybiker;1010523323]Its time to look for an old John Wayne movie or something[/QUOTE]Ha! You must be a mind reader. I am watching Geronimo on the western channel.
[QUOTE=cowboybiker;1010511813][img]http://www.septemberclues.info/images/JumpersIntoSheeplePit.gif[/img][/QUOTE]
Well played.
[QUOTE=so-tex;1010508983]Did you know that the evil republicans want to cut back on the U.S. postal service hours, and that the U.S. postal service is vital to our survival?[/QUOTE]
Firstly, I know you were being sarcastic. Secondly, [i]everyone[/i] should be alarmed by their inefficiency and fiscal losses. Even MSM will tell you this: [url]http://miami.cbslocal.com/2012/11/15/report-usps-losing-billions/[/url]
But this ^ is "new" report, when it was known they were bleeding billions in losses for the past several years.
And "smart" people thought to themselves, "Hmmm....yes, lets let the govt run 1/5th of our entire economy (Obamacare), because they're doing such a swell job with time-tested other ventures that aren't nearly at that breadth :rolleyes:
Lastly, you live and work with these idiots ;)
[QUOTE=dbx;1010533073]Firstly, I know you were being sarcastic. Secondly, [i]everyone[/i] should be alarmed by their inefficiency and fiscal losses. Even MSM will tell you this: [url]http://miami.cbslocal.com/2012/11/15/report-usps-losing-billions/[/url]
But this ^ is "new" report, when it was known they were bleeding billions in losses for the past several years.
And "smart" people thought to themselves, "Hmmm....yes, lets let the govt run 1/5th of our entire economy (Obamacare), because they're doing such a swell job with time-tested other ventures that aren't nearly at that breadth :rolleyes:
Lastly, you live and work with these idiots ;)[/QUOTE]Did you know that it is in the constitution that the postal service exist? I sure the hell didn't. I learned this from msnbc, srs.
[QUOTE=so-tex;1010536823]Did you know that it is in the constitution that the postal service exist? I sure the hell didn't. I learned this from msnbc, srs.[/QUOTE]
Yep, it's right after part in the commerce clause that allows the feds to impose anything they wish, including forcing people to purchase services from 3rd parties.
[img]http://www.federalobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/ginsberg.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=so-tex;1010536823]Did you know that it is in the constitution that the postal service exist? I sure the hell didn't. I learned this from msnbc, srs.[/QUOTE]
Yes, and that's why liberals (twisted ones) will argue that we [i]already[/i] have [i]socialism[/i]! (don't forget to add in police and firemen). It's a great argument, really. After all they demonstrate against their own weak argument about that....."slippery slope" that they so hate :).
[QUOTE=mslman71;1010538483]Yep, it's right after part in the commerce clause that allows the feds to impose anything they wish, including forcing people to purchase services from 3rd parties.
[img]http://www.federalobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/ginsberg.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
Can't fault [i]this[/i] one on libs, as it was Roberts himself, that decided this. I hate it, but I can't run from facts.
[QUOTE=dbx;1010542793]
Can't fault [i]this[/i] one on libs, as it was Roberts himself, that decided this. I hate it, but I can't run from facts.[/QUOTE]
It was less about Roberts deciding vote, given of course that Ginsburg and Sotomayor will do whatever ever Obama wants, and more about the notion that the Constitution is pretty much whatever they want it to be whenever they wish. This is true for infringements from the left and the right, though Ginsburg is the most unapologetic when it comes to describing her job as more fostering her own view of goodwill and morality than it is adhering to the letter of the law. I hate the bitch. And I mean that.
[QUOTE=mslman71;1010545183][b]It was less about Roberts deciding vote[/b], given of course that Ginsburg and Sotomayor will do whatever ever Obama wants, and more about the notion that the Constitution is pretty much whatever they want it to be whenever they wish. This is true for infringements from the left and the right, though Ginsburg is the most unapologetic when it comes to describing her job as more fostering her own view of goodwill and morality than it is adhering to the letter of the law. I hate the bitch. And I mean that.[/QUOTE]
No, it was [i]exactly[/i] about that. Exactly.
We interrupt this unscheduled debate to bring you John Wayne.
[img]http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m3izl8Ix4A1qavlq8o1_500.gif[/img]
[QUOTE=cowboybiker;1010550593]We interrupt this unscheduled debate to bring you John Wayne.
[img]http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m3izl8Ix4A1qavlq8o1_500.gif[/img][/QUOTE]
Intermission is OVER!
:D
[QUOTE=dbx;1010542793]Yes, and that's why liberals (twisted ones) will argue that we [i]already[/i] have [i]socialism[/i]! (don't forget to add in police and firemen). It's a great argument, really. After all they demonstrate against their own weak argument about that....."slippery slope" that they so hate :).
Can't fault [i]this[/i] one on libs, as it was Roberts himself, that decided this. I hate it, but I can't run from facts.[/QUOTE]I know, I should have not put the srs. tag on this. I was just being facetious.
[QUOTE=so-tex;1010552433]I know, I should have [b]not[/b] put the srs. tag on this. I was just being facetious.[/QUOTE]
Did not see a serious tag :confused:
And beside, what's serious about the Misc section of O-35? :D :D
[QUOTE=dbx;1010547073]No, it was [i]exactly[/i] about that. Exactly.[/QUOTE]
Not for me it wasn't. That was never my intended point. The off handed reference to the health care act was a very small component of my skepticism as it pertains to the courts; a skepticism I've held rather intensely since the Patriot Act came to pass, though I freely admit that was more a function of my naivety up to that point in time and less of one of the court changing.
edit: Along those lines though, Roberts is one person. I suppose I can't fault the libs for being libs if my game is to split the court along those lines, but it's not.
[QUOTE=mslman71;1010555293]Not for me it wasn't. That was never my intended point.[/QUOTE]
But it was [i]mine[/i]; a well known conservative judge...casting the deciding vote. Epic. Am I wrong?
[QUOTE=mslman71;1010555293] The off handed reference to the health care act was a very small component of my skepticism as it pertains to the courts; a skepticism I've held rather intensely since the Patriot Act came to pass, though I freely admit that was more a function of my naivety up to that point in time and less of one of the court changing.[/QUOTE]
I understand...maybe we just clashed on what we perceived as "important" out of that. Me? Was totally wrapped up in why Roberts chose to land where he did. With his pedigree....it was more than interesting to me.
As far as the Patriot Act is concerned, we would have to make a different thread :). It is a subject that will be argued for eons....if we last that long :).
[QUOTE=cowboybiker;1010550593]We interrupt this unscheduled debate to bring you John Wayne.
[img]http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m3izl8Ix4A1qavlq8o1_500.gif[/img][/QUOTE]I am watching Destry now, starring Audie Murphy. If I can't have John Wayne, he is a close 2nd. :)
whay are you watching thatcrap when Barrett Jackson is on?
[QUOTE=dbx;1010560793]But it was [i]mine[/i]; a well known conservative judge...casting the deciding vote. Epic. Am I wrong?
I understand...maybe we just clashed on what we perceived as "important" out of that. Me? Was totally wrapped up in why Roberts chose to land where he did. With his pedigree....it was more than interesting to me.
As far as the Patriot Act is concerned, we would have to make a different thread :). It is a subject that will be argued for eons....if we last that long :).[/QUOTE]
Ah, okay, valid angle. The quote thing threw me. I would need to read his opinion to get a better feel for how he got to where he did and obviously I haven't read it.