View Full Version : squat fom check
lee__d
09-08-2011, 11:47 AM
cant get an answer anywhere else. hook a bro up
7b-a9akFeho&list=UU7AFw5jkBlXAA3wmBfd20cg&feature=plcp
i recorded it loud by accident, lower volume
one rep of 305lb
Just wanna see what you guys think of my form with heavier (for me) weight. I think it's pretty tight, please comment.
thx brahs.
measly reps
ko300zx
09-08-2011, 11:48 AM
It would be awesome if there was a nu....oh good, you found it! ;)
lee__d
09-08-2011, 11:50 AM
lol, forgot about the NUT misk, it's like a week old,
Dujin77
09-08-2011, 11:52 AM
I was to distracted by rush playing in the background.
kkaustin812
09-08-2011, 11:53 AM
I think your knees go forward a little too much but im no expert.
HunterCML
09-08-2011, 11:55 AM
Seems like on the way up you were lifting your chest up as opposed to driving your hips.
Other than that, looks good. Mirin' that you actually squat deep like a man and don't cheat yourself like 99% of the phags in my gym.
gjdm
joelash302
09-08-2011, 11:57 AM
Looks good. Might want to cut out the baby steps. 2 steps out and you should be ready to go.
lee__d
09-08-2011, 11:57 AM
thx brahs.
yea, i has the stones on my ipod. music in the gym aint to bad, but i dont want ppl talking to me lol
lee__d
09-08-2011, 11:58 AM
Looks good. Might want to cut out the baby steps. 2 steps out and you should be ready to go.
prob subconscious remnants of my OCD, lol. i'll take note of it now tho
sawoobley
09-08-2011, 11:58 AM
Seems like on the way up you were lifting your chest up as opposed to driving your hips.
That's what I thought. Seems to be looking towards the ceiling on the way up. In for response from the experts.
Good job on getting low.
mike201011
09-08-2011, 11:58 AM
Looks pretty good to me man. Good job :)
ironwill2008
09-08-2011, 11:59 AM
Looks good; bar path is straight, no round-backing it at the bottom, very good depth. I'd suggest you take a vid from the front or back also, to verify that your knees aren't caving in.
You're on your way, bud. Maintain this same form as you gradually increase the load, and you'll be building some wheels.
lee__d
09-08-2011, 12:03 PM
That's what I thought. Seems to be looking towards the ceiling on the way up. In for response from the experts.
Good job on getting low.
thx man
Looks pretty good to me man. Good job :)
thx
Looks good; bar path is straight, no round-backing it at the bottom, very good depth. I'd suggest you take a vid from the front or back also, to verify that your knees aren't caving in.
You're on your way, bud. Maintain this same form as you gradually increase the load, and you'll be building some wheels.
I've been pretty paranoid about adding weight w/o a spotter (even in the rack, yes), so when i get heavy i really only increase by 5 or 10lb. thx for the critique.
i'm actually surprise the vid was good, i had my phone held up with a 5lb weight lol
PBateman2
09-08-2011, 12:05 PM
I'd suggest you take a vid from the front or back also, to verify that your knees aren't caving in.
.
^This.
Overall good form.
snorkelman
09-08-2011, 12:08 PM
Hard to see where you are looking, but I was always advised to pick a spot on the wall/mirror in front of you slightly higher than your head, and just fixate on that spot throughout the entire ROM.
lee__d
09-08-2011, 12:10 PM
^This.
Overall good form.
thx, ill try to get one next time out
Hard to see where you are looking, but I was always advised to pick a spot on the wall/mirror in front of you slightly higher than your head, and just fixate on that spot throughout the entire ROM.
honestly, i can't even tell u lol, i dont remember, but i'll try to be aware of this from now on.
thx
ErickStevens
09-08-2011, 12:13 PM
Needs more hip drive. I'd look up the entire time, don't look into the mirror.
lee__d
09-08-2011, 12:18 PM
Needs more hip drive. I'd look up the entire time, don't look into the mirror.
thx. i try to focus on the parts of the body i want to utilize when performing a movement. but sometimes when i start i go full r3tard and just complete the movement empty headed.
ironwill2008
09-08-2011, 12:26 PM
I've been pretty paranoid about adding weight w/o a spotter (even in the rack, yes), so when i get heavy i really only increase by 5 or 10lb.
Just be sure to set the pins correctly every time you Squat (using a power rack), and you'll be okay; no spotter required (or actually, desired).
As far as bumping by only a nickel or a dime, that's the smart way to train. Slow, but steady, progression is the best path to mass/strength. You'll always be working close to your ability, which will increase your confidence as well as decrease your chance of injury.
lee__d
09-08-2011, 12:28 PM
Just be sure to set the pins correctly every time you Squat (using a power rack), and you'll be okay; no spotter required (or actually, desired).
As far as bumping by only a nickel or a dime, that's the smart way to train. Slow, but steady, progression is the best path to mass/strength. You'll always be working close to your ability, which will increase your confidence as well as decrease your chance of injury.
thx, appreciate it man.
PerpetualMotion
09-08-2011, 12:30 PM
The only thing I'd change is the next being in extension. Rippetoe notes this in SS and he says it inhibits hip drive.
From a more physiological standpoint, the thing that's gaining some momentum, especially amongst coaches and trainers with physical therapy backgrounds, is called "packing the neck," which you can read here: http://charlieweingroff.com/2010/11/packing-in-the-neck/
If you don't want to read that then the idea is simple. If the lumbar and thoracic (the lower and middle-to-upper back) should remain neutral then why shouldn't the cervical? When you "pack" the neck you're simply reinforcing (via pressure) a neutral cervical spine. I forget where I read it but someone noted that deficiencies in the lumbar tend to start with problems in the neck. By packing the neck you're stabilizing the entire spine into a neutral position.
The take home message should just be keep everything neutral. Don't be fickle about packing and what not. Mike Robertson talks about coaching a neutral neck: http://robertsontrainingsystems.com/blog/coaching-neutral-neck/
Also, here's a video of Tony Gentilcore (190lbs) deadlifting 570lbs with a packed neck:
VLYA0OpEVHU
It looks super ****ing goofy because you're forcing a double chin but it has been gaining some momentum. It hasn't in the powerlifting circle but mostly amongst trainers such as Eric Cressey.
OR you can just change nothing. There are a lot of great lifters who have their necks in extension.
prob subconscious remnants of my OCD, lol. i'll take note of it now tho
Sorry, it's a pet peeve but don't use the word subconscious. Google it to find out why but the appropriate words are unconscious, preconscious, and conscious.
lee__d
09-08-2011, 12:34 PM
The only thing I'd change is the next being in extension. Rippetoe notes this in SS and he says it inhibits hip drive.
From a more physiological standpoint, the thing that's gaining some momentum, especially amongst coaches and trainers with physical therapy backgrounds, is called "packing the neck," which you can read here: http://charlieweingroff.com/2010/11/packing-in-the-neck/
If you don't want to read that then the idea is simple. If the lumbar and thoracic (the lower and middle-to-upper back) should remain neutral then why shouldn't the cervical? When you "pack" the neck you're simply reinforcing (via pressure) a neutral cervical spine. I forget where I read it but someone noted that deficiencies in the lumbar tend to start with problems in the neck. By packing the neck you're stabilizing the entire spine into a neutral position.
The take home message should just be keep everything neutral. Don't be fickle about packing and what not. Mike Robertson talks about coaching a neutral neck: http://robertsontrainingsystems.com/blog/coaching-neutral-neck/
Also, here's a video of Tony Gentilcore (190lbs) deadlifting 570lbs with a packed neck:
VLYA0OpEVHU
It looks super ****ing goofy because you're forcing a double chin but it has been gaining some momentum. It hasn't in the powerlifting circle but mostly amongst trainers such as Eric Cressey.
OR you can just change nothing. There are a lot of great lifters who have their necks in extension.
Sorry, it's a pet peeve but don't use the word subconscious. Google it to find out why but the appropriate words are unconscious, preconscious, and conscious.
thx, ill check that out.
as for the levels of consciousness, tldr tldr tldr
HunterCML
09-08-2011, 12:35 PM
If you don't want to read that then the idea is simple. If the lumbar and thoracic (the lower and middle-to-upper back) should remain neutral then why shouldn't the cervical? When you "pack" the neck you're simply reinforcing (via pressure) a neutral cervical spine. I forget where I read it but someone noted that deficiencies in the lumbar tend to start with problems in the neck. By packing the neck you're stabilizing the entire spine into a neutral position.
Spine alignment is crucial, OP. You don't want to contract back issues such as Lordosis do you?
http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j66/Raz5219/LordosisGirl.jpg
wait, i culd b wrong tho